没有失败:肌肉适应单组阻力训练进行失败或重复储备。

Thomas Hermann,Adam E Mohan,Alysson Enes,Max Sapuppo,Alec Piñero,Arman Zamanzadeh,Michael Roberts,Max Coleman,Patroklos Androulakis Korakakis,Milo Wolf,Martin Refalo,Paul A Swinton,Brad J Schoenfeld
{"title":"没有失败:肌肉适应单组阻力训练进行失败或重复储备。","authors":"Thomas Hermann,Adam E Mohan,Alysson Enes,Max Sapuppo,Alec Piñero,Arman Zamanzadeh,Michael Roberts,Max Coleman,Patroklos Androulakis Korakakis,Milo Wolf,Martin Refalo,Paul A Swinton,Brad J Schoenfeld","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"METHODS\r\nForty-two young, resistance-trained men and women were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 parallel groups: A group that trained to failure on all exercises (FAIL) or a submaximal effort group (2-RIR) that trained with two repetitions in reserve for the same exercises. Participants performed a single set of 9 exercises targeting all major muscle groups per session, twice weekly for 8 weeks. We assessed pre-post study changes in muscle thickness for the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and quadriceps femoris, along with measures of muscular strength, power, endurance, and ability to estimate RIR in the bench press and squat.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nResults indicated that both FAIL and 2-RIR elicited appreciable gains in most of the assessed outcomes. Several measures of hypertrophy tended to favor FAIL, although absolute differences between conditions were generally modest. Increases in countermovement jump height favored FAIL, but with no clear statistical support for either the null or alternative hypothesis. Increases in strength and local muscular endurance were similar between conditions. Participants demonstrated greater accuracy in estimating RIR for the bench press compared to the squat and improved their accuracy over the intervention, particularly for the bench press.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese findings suggest that single-set routines can be a time-efficient strategy for promoting muscular adaptations in resistance-trained individuals, even when transitioning from higher-volume programs. Training to failure in single-set routines may modestly enhance some measures of muscle hypertrophy and power, but not strength or local muscle endurance.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Without Fail: Muscular Adaptations in Single Set Resistance Training Performed to Failure or with Repetitions-in-Reserve.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hermann,Adam E Mohan,Alysson Enes,Max Sapuppo,Alec Piñero,Arman Zamanzadeh,Michael Roberts,Max Coleman,Patroklos Androulakis Korakakis,Milo Wolf,Martin Refalo,Paul A Swinton,Brad J Schoenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/mss.0000000000003728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"METHODS\\r\\nForty-two young, resistance-trained men and women were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 parallel groups: A group that trained to failure on all exercises (FAIL) or a submaximal effort group (2-RIR) that trained with two repetitions in reserve for the same exercises. Participants performed a single set of 9 exercises targeting all major muscle groups per session, twice weekly for 8 weeks. We assessed pre-post study changes in muscle thickness for the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and quadriceps femoris, along with measures of muscular strength, power, endurance, and ability to estimate RIR in the bench press and squat.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nResults indicated that both FAIL and 2-RIR elicited appreciable gains in most of the assessed outcomes. Several measures of hypertrophy tended to favor FAIL, although absolute differences between conditions were generally modest. Increases in countermovement jump height favored FAIL, but with no clear statistical support for either the null or alternative hypothesis. Increases in strength and local muscular endurance were similar between conditions. Participants demonstrated greater accuracy in estimating RIR for the bench press compared to the squat and improved their accuracy over the intervention, particularly for the bench press.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThese findings suggest that single-set routines can be a time-efficient strategy for promoting muscular adaptations in resistance-trained individuals, even when transitioning from higher-volume programs. Training to failure in single-set routines may modestly enhance some measures of muscle hypertrophy and power, but not strength or local muscle endurance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法将 42 名接受过阻力训练的男女青年随机分配到两个平行组中的一组:一组在所有练习中都训练到失败(FAIL),另一组为亚最大努力组(2-RIR),在相同练习中保留两次重复。参与者在 8 周内每周进行两次针对所有主要肌群的单组 9 次练习。我们评估了研究前后肱二头肌、肱三头肌和股四头肌肌肉厚度的变化,以及卧推和深蹲的肌肉力量、力量、耐力和估计RIR的能力。尽管不同条件下的绝对差异一般不大,但一些肥大测量指标倾向于 FAIL。反向运动跳跃高度的增加倾向于 FAIL,但对零假设或替代假设都没有明确的统计支持。在不同条件下,力量和局部肌肉耐力的增加情况相似。与深蹲相比,参与者在估算卧推RIR时表现出更高的准确性,并且在干预过程中提高了准确性,尤其是卧推。在单组套路中进行失败训练可能会适度增强肌肉肥大和力量的某些指标,但不会增强力量或局部肌肉耐力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Without Fail: Muscular Adaptations in Single Set Resistance Training Performed to Failure or with Repetitions-in-Reserve.
METHODS Forty-two young, resistance-trained men and women were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 parallel groups: A group that trained to failure on all exercises (FAIL) or a submaximal effort group (2-RIR) that trained with two repetitions in reserve for the same exercises. Participants performed a single set of 9 exercises targeting all major muscle groups per session, twice weekly for 8 weeks. We assessed pre-post study changes in muscle thickness for the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and quadriceps femoris, along with measures of muscular strength, power, endurance, and ability to estimate RIR in the bench press and squat. RESULTS Results indicated that both FAIL and 2-RIR elicited appreciable gains in most of the assessed outcomes. Several measures of hypertrophy tended to favor FAIL, although absolute differences between conditions were generally modest. Increases in countermovement jump height favored FAIL, but with no clear statistical support for either the null or alternative hypothesis. Increases in strength and local muscular endurance were similar between conditions. Participants demonstrated greater accuracy in estimating RIR for the bench press compared to the squat and improved their accuracy over the intervention, particularly for the bench press. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that single-set routines can be a time-efficient strategy for promoting muscular adaptations in resistance-trained individuals, even when transitioning from higher-volume programs. Training to failure in single-set routines may modestly enhance some measures of muscle hypertrophy and power, but not strength or local muscle endurance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信