使用聊天软件加强学生学习：护理课程案例研究

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING

Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.09.009

Malcolm Elliott RN, PhD, Jackie Williams RN, MNP, Rami Aldwikat RN, PhD, Pauline Wong RN, PhD

{"title":"使用聊天软件加强学生学习：护理课程案例研究","authors":"Malcolm Elliott RN, PhD, Jackie Williams RN, MNP, Rami Aldwikat RN, PhD, Pauline Wong RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ease with which Artificial Intelligence (AI) can produce an apparent rigorous response to a question makes AI an appealing resource for tertiary students. But students might not be aware of the limitations of this new technology.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a novel assessment task on preregistration nursing students’ attitudes towards the use of artificial technology in academic writing.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A clinically focused question was entered into ChatGPT and an answer generated. The assessment task required nursing students to critique the ChatGPT answer using evidence-based literature. To do this, students had to search for literature which was relevant to the assessment question and then use this evidence to critique the ChatGPT generated response.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most students achieved the assignment task aims by answering the assessment questions thoroughly. Students’ feedback indicated the assignment improved their understanding of how to use evidence-based literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The assignment task was effective in informing nursing students of the limitations of ChatGPT. It is recommended to academics who are concerned about students using this technology in their academic writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages e309-e312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using chatgpt to enhance student learning: a case study in a nursing curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Malcolm Elliott RN, PhD, Jackie Williams RN, MNP, Rami Aldwikat RN, PhD, Pauline Wong RN, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2024.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ease with which Artificial Intelligence (AI) can produce an apparent rigorous response to a question makes AI an appealing resource for tertiary students. But students might not be aware of the limitations of this new technology.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a novel assessment task on preregistration nursing students’ attitudes towards the use of artificial technology in academic writing.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A clinically focused question was entered into ChatGPT and an answer generated. The assessment task required nursing students to critique the ChatGPT answer using evidence-based literature. To do this, students had to search for literature which was relevant to the assessment question and then use this evidence to critique the ChatGPT generated response.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most students achieved the assignment task aims by answering the assessment questions thoroughly. Students’ feedback indicated the assignment improved their understanding of how to use evidence-based literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The assignment task was effective in informing nursing students of the limitations of ChatGPT. It is recommended to academics who are concerned about students using this technology in their academic writing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages e309-e312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724002075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724002075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能（AI）可以轻松地对问题做出明显严谨的回答，这使得人工智能成为吸引大学生的资源。但学生们可能没有意识到这项新技术的局限性。目的评估一种新的评估任务对注册前护理学生在学术写作中使用人工技术的态度的影响。方法在ChatGPT中输入一个临床焦点问题并生成答案。评估任务要求护生使用循证文献对ChatGPT答案进行评价。要做到这一点，学生必须搜索与评估问题相关的文献，然后使用这些证据来批评ChatGPT生成的回答。结果大部分学生通过完整地回答评估问题达到了任务目标。学生们的反馈表明，这项作业提高了他们对如何使用循证文献的理解。结论作业任务能有效告知护生ChatGPT的局限性。推荐给那些担心学生在学术写作中使用这种技术的学者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Using chatgpt to enhance student learning: a case study in a nursing curriculum

Background

The ease with which Artificial Intelligence (AI) can produce an apparent rigorous response to a question makes AI an appealing resource for tertiary students. But students might not be aware of the limitations of this new technology.

Aim

To evaluate the impact of a novel assessment task on preregistration nursing students’ attitudes towards the use of artificial technology in academic writing.

Method

A clinically focused question was entered into ChatGPT and an answer generated. The assessment task required nursing students to critique the ChatGPT answer using evidence-based literature. To do this, students had to search for literature which was relevant to the assessment question and then use this evidence to critique the ChatGPT generated response.

Results

Most students achieved the assignment task aims by answering the assessment questions thoroughly. Students’ feedback indicated the assignment improved their understanding of how to use evidence-based literature.

Conclusions

The assignment task was effective in informing nursing students of the limitations of ChatGPT. It is recommended to academics who are concerned about students using this technology in their academic writing.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Teaching and Learning in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

10.50%

发文量

119

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty