丈夫当头?从高度宗教信仰的妻子和丈夫看婚姻性别等级的不同视角

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1111/famp.70037
Jolyn C. Schraedel, Loren D. Marks, Andrew H. Rose, David C. Dollahite, Jeffrey P. Dew, Adam A. Rogers
{"title":"丈夫当头?从高度宗教信仰的妻子和丈夫看婚姻性别等级的不同视角","authors":"Jolyn C. Schraedel,&nbsp;Loren D. Marks,&nbsp;Andrew H. Rose,&nbsp;David C. Dollahite,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Dew,&nbsp;Adam A. Rogers","doi":"10.1111/famp.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Although religious beliefs often connect with gendered hierarchy in social science research, religion also relates to numerous positive marital outcomes, and very few studies have examined religion and gendered hierarchy within intimate relationships. To bridge this divide, our study used a diverse, exemplar sample to explore how highly religious, heterosexual married couples view and navigate the possibility of gendered hierarchy. Interviews from 74 highly religious, highly satisfied couples provided insight into the following themes: (1) potential harm in viewing hierarchy as sacred, (2) the correct view of sacred hierarchy, (3) hierarchy rejected for sacred equal partnership, and (4) holding hierarchy as sacred. Views simultaneously embracing egalitarian and hierarchical ideas indicate some nuance regarding the construct of gendered hierarchy. Data drawn directly from interviews provide detailed support in the paper for each finding. For participants who accepted the principle of gendered hierarchy, devotion to God and belief in sacred roles appeared as partial explanations for that belief. Whether participants accepted gendered hierarchy or rejected it, unity, love, and respect between partners emerged as central to navigating power dynamics in marriage. Implications for clinicians include careful assessment for indications of abuse of power or intimate partner violence, entering the worldview of religious clients, and willingness to respect expectations viewed as sacred.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Husband as Head?: Diverse Perspectives on Gendered Marital Hierarchy From Highly Religious Wives and Husbands\",\"authors\":\"Jolyn C. Schraedel,&nbsp;Loren D. Marks,&nbsp;Andrew H. Rose,&nbsp;David C. Dollahite,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Dew,&nbsp;Adam A. Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/famp.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Although religious beliefs often connect with gendered hierarchy in social science research, religion also relates to numerous positive marital outcomes, and very few studies have examined religion and gendered hierarchy within intimate relationships. To bridge this divide, our study used a diverse, exemplar sample to explore how highly religious, heterosexual married couples view and navigate the possibility of gendered hierarchy. Interviews from 74 highly religious, highly satisfied couples provided insight into the following themes: (1) potential harm in viewing hierarchy as sacred, (2) the correct view of sacred hierarchy, (3) hierarchy rejected for sacred equal partnership, and (4) holding hierarchy as sacred. Views simultaneously embracing egalitarian and hierarchical ideas indicate some nuance regarding the construct of gendered hierarchy. Data drawn directly from interviews provide detailed support in the paper for each finding. For participants who accepted the principle of gendered hierarchy, devotion to God and belief in sacred roles appeared as partial explanations for that belief. Whether participants accepted gendered hierarchy or rejected it, unity, love, and respect between partners emerged as central to navigating power dynamics in marriage. Implications for clinicians include careful assessment for indications of abuse of power or intimate partner violence, entering the worldview of religious clients, and willingness to respect expectations viewed as sacred.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Process\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然宗教信仰在社会科学研究中经常与性别等级联系在一起,但宗教也与许多积极的婚姻结果有关,很少有研究在亲密关系中考察宗教和性别等级。为了弥合这一鸿沟,我们的研究使用了一个多样化的、典型的样本来探索高度宗教信仰的异性恋已婚夫妇如何看待和驾驭性别等级的可能性。对74对高度信教、高度满意的夫妇的采访提供了以下主题的见解:(1)将等级视为神圣的潜在危害,(2)对神圣等级的正确看法,(3)拒绝神圣平等伙伴关系的等级,以及(4)将等级视为神圣。同时包含平等主义和等级观念的观点表明了性别等级结构的一些细微差别。直接从访谈中获得的数据在论文中为每个发现提供了详细的支持。对于接受性别等级原则的参与者来说,对上帝的忠诚和对神圣角色的信仰似乎是这种信仰的部分解释。无论参与者是否接受或拒绝性别等级制度,伴侣之间的团结、爱和尊重都成为婚姻中权力动态的核心。对临床医生的启示包括仔细评估滥用权力或亲密伴侣暴力的迹象,进入宗教客户的世界观,以及尊重被视为神圣的期望的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Husband as Head?: Diverse Perspectives on Gendered Marital Hierarchy From Highly Religious Wives and Husbands

Although religious beliefs often connect with gendered hierarchy in social science research, religion also relates to numerous positive marital outcomes, and very few studies have examined religion and gendered hierarchy within intimate relationships. To bridge this divide, our study used a diverse, exemplar sample to explore how highly religious, heterosexual married couples view and navigate the possibility of gendered hierarchy. Interviews from 74 highly religious, highly satisfied couples provided insight into the following themes: (1) potential harm in viewing hierarchy as sacred, (2) the correct view of sacred hierarchy, (3) hierarchy rejected for sacred equal partnership, and (4) holding hierarchy as sacred. Views simultaneously embracing egalitarian and hierarchical ideas indicate some nuance regarding the construct of gendered hierarchy. Data drawn directly from interviews provide detailed support in the paper for each finding. For participants who accepted the principle of gendered hierarchy, devotion to God and belief in sacred roles appeared as partial explanations for that belief. Whether participants accepted gendered hierarchy or rejected it, unity, love, and respect between partners emerged as central to navigating power dynamics in marriage. Implications for clinicians include careful assessment for indications of abuse of power or intimate partner violence, entering the worldview of religious clients, and willingness to respect expectations viewed as sacred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信