Qiuling Tao, Xintong Yang, Longke Bao, Yuexin Zhou, Tao Yang, Yilu Zhao, Rongpei Shi, Zhifu Yao, Xingjun Liu
{"title":"将机器学习模型知识转化为多主元高温合金相设计的材料洞察","authors":"Qiuling Tao, Xintong Yang, Longke Bao, Yuexin Zhou, Tao Yang, Yilu Zhao, Rongpei Shi, Zhifu Yao, Xingjun Liu","doi":"10.1038/s41524-025-01578-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Machine learning (ML) is a powerful tool for the accelerated design and development of various materials. However, the constructed ML models are often difficult to use by researchers other than the creator, that is, model sharing is a challenge. Here, we propose a method to avoid this issue by transforming the knowledge learned from ML models into material rules to obtain a generic design strategy. Specifically, we take the prediction of phase formation in multi-principal-element superalloys (MPESAs) as an example. First, we construct two classification models using ML algorithms to predict the presence or absence of the L1<sub>2</sub> phase and other phases, respectively. Then, the Shapley additive explanation method is used to extract knowledge from the models and transform them into understandable material insights. Based on this method, we obtain a generic design strategy for rapidly determining the phase formation of MPESAs, specifically the combination of <span>\\(\\overline{{VEC}}\\)</span> > 8, −16.0 < ∆<i>H</i><sub>mix</sub> < −9.7 J∙mol<sup>−1</sup> ∙ K<sup>−1</sup>, and 1671 < <span>\\(\\bar{{T}_{m}}\\)</span> < 1822 K. This strategy enables the rapid and highly accurate (>98%) design of alloys with an “FCC + L1<sub>2</sub>” dual-phase microstructure. We used this strategy to randomly select 12 candidates composed of different elements from the large design space for experimental preparation. The experimental results show that all these alloys exhibit the ideal “FCC + L1<sub>2</sub>” dual-phase microstructure, verifying the accuracy of the design strategy. Notably, one of the alloys has a good combination of high solvus temperature (1218 °C) and very low density (7.77 g‧cm<sup>−3</sup>), superior to most MPESAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19342,"journal":{"name":"npj Computational Materials","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming machine learning model knowledge into material insights for multi-principal-element superalloy phase design\",\"authors\":\"Qiuling Tao, Xintong Yang, Longke Bao, Yuexin Zhou, Tao Yang, Yilu Zhao, Rongpei Shi, Zhifu Yao, Xingjun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41524-025-01578-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Machine learning (ML) is a powerful tool for the accelerated design and development of various materials. However, the constructed ML models are often difficult to use by researchers other than the creator, that is, model sharing is a challenge. Here, we propose a method to avoid this issue by transforming the knowledge learned from ML models into material rules to obtain a generic design strategy. Specifically, we take the prediction of phase formation in multi-principal-element superalloys (MPESAs) as an example. First, we construct two classification models using ML algorithms to predict the presence or absence of the L1<sub>2</sub> phase and other phases, respectively. Then, the Shapley additive explanation method is used to extract knowledge from the models and transform them into understandable material insights. Based on this method, we obtain a generic design strategy for rapidly determining the phase formation of MPESAs, specifically the combination of <span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{VEC}}\\\\)</span> > 8, −16.0 < ∆<i>H</i><sub>mix</sub> < −9.7 J∙mol<sup>−1</sup> ∙ K<sup>−1</sup>, and 1671 < <span>\\\\(\\\\bar{{T}_{m}}\\\\)</span> < 1822 K. This strategy enables the rapid and highly accurate (>98%) design of alloys with an “FCC + L1<sub>2</sub>” dual-phase microstructure. We used this strategy to randomly select 12 candidates composed of different elements from the large design space for experimental preparation. The experimental results show that all these alloys exhibit the ideal “FCC + L1<sub>2</sub>” dual-phase microstructure, verifying the accuracy of the design strategy. Notably, one of the alloys has a good combination of high solvus temperature (1218 °C) and very low density (7.77 g‧cm<sup>−3</sup>), superior to most MPESAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Computational Materials\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Computational Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01578-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Computational Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01578-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
机器学习(ML)是加速各种材料设计和开发的强大工具。然而,构建的ML模型通常难以被创建者以外的研究人员使用,也就是说,模型共享是一个挑战。在这里,我们提出了一种方法,通过将从ML模型中学到的知识转化为材料规则来获得通用的设计策略,从而避免了这一问题。具体来说,我们以多主元素高温合金(mpesa)相形成的预测为例。首先,我们使用ML算法构建了两个分类模型,分别预测L12相和其他相的存在与否。然后,使用Shapley加性解释方法从模型中提取知识,并将其转化为可理解的材料见解。基于该方法,我们获得了快速确定mpesa相形成的通用设计策略,特别是\(\overline{{VEC}}\) &gt; 8,−16.0 &lt;∆Hmix &lt; - 9.7 J∙mol−1∙K−1,和1671 &lt;\(\bar{{T}_{m}}\) &lt; 1822 K。这一策略使快速和高精度的(&gt;98)%) design of alloys with an “FCC + L12” dual-phase microstructure. We used this strategy to randomly select 12 candidates composed of different elements from the large design space for experimental preparation. The experimental results show that all these alloys exhibit the ideal “FCC + L12” dual-phase microstructure, verifying the accuracy of the design strategy. Notably, one of the alloys has a good combination of high solvus temperature (1218 °C) and very low density (7.77 g‧cm−3), superior to most MPESAs.
Transforming machine learning model knowledge into material insights for multi-principal-element superalloy phase design
Machine learning (ML) is a powerful tool for the accelerated design and development of various materials. However, the constructed ML models are often difficult to use by researchers other than the creator, that is, model sharing is a challenge. Here, we propose a method to avoid this issue by transforming the knowledge learned from ML models into material rules to obtain a generic design strategy. Specifically, we take the prediction of phase formation in multi-principal-element superalloys (MPESAs) as an example. First, we construct two classification models using ML algorithms to predict the presence or absence of the L12 phase and other phases, respectively. Then, the Shapley additive explanation method is used to extract knowledge from the models and transform them into understandable material insights. Based on this method, we obtain a generic design strategy for rapidly determining the phase formation of MPESAs, specifically the combination of \(\overline{{VEC}}\) > 8, −16.0 < ∆Hmix < −9.7 J∙mol−1 ∙ K−1, and 1671 < \(\bar{{T}_{m}}\) < 1822 K. This strategy enables the rapid and highly accurate (>98%) design of alloys with an “FCC + L12” dual-phase microstructure. We used this strategy to randomly select 12 candidates composed of different elements from the large design space for experimental preparation. The experimental results show that all these alloys exhibit the ideal “FCC + L12” dual-phase microstructure, verifying the accuracy of the design strategy. Notably, one of the alloys has a good combination of high solvus temperature (1218 °C) and very low density (7.77 g‧cm−3), superior to most MPESAs.
期刊介绍:
npj Computational Materials is a high-quality open access journal from Nature Research that publishes research papers applying computational approaches for the design of new materials and enhancing our understanding of existing ones. The journal also welcomes papers on new computational techniques and the refinement of current approaches that support these aims, as well as experimental papers that complement computational findings.
Some key features of npj Computational Materials include a 2-year impact factor of 12.241 (2021), article downloads of 1,138,590 (2021), and a fast turnaround time of 11 days from submission to the first editorial decision. The journal is indexed in various databases and services, including Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Astrophysics Data System (ADS), Current Contents/Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, SCOPUS, EI Compendex, INSPEC, Google Scholar, SCImago, DOAJ, CNKI, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), among others.