IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Yi Zhou , Long Yang , Junqun Fang , Xue Lei , Dan Luo
{"title":"Translation and validation of the multidimensional scale of perceived discrimination (MSPD) among Chinese caregivers of children with congenital disorders","authors":"Yi Zhou ,&nbsp;Long Yang ,&nbsp;Junqun Fang ,&nbsp;Xue Lei ,&nbsp;Dan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The original English version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Discrimination (MSPD) was translated and cross-culturally adapted into a Chinese version (MSPD-C).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Psychometric testing was conducted among 194 caregivers of children with congenital disorders. Internal consistency was tested by calculating Cronbach's α. Test-retest reliability was calculated among 30 participants selected randomly to complete the questionnaire again in 2 weeks. Factor structure was tested with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and concurrent validity was examined by investigating the correlations of the MSPD-C with caregiver burden and anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Cronbach's α coefficient for MSPD-C is 0.979, and the test-retest reliability values is 0.905. CFA supported the four-factor model with the best goodness-of-fit indices (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.022, RMSEA = 0.073, SRMR = 0.035, CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.928). The concurrent validity of the MSPD-C was further supported by its significant positive correlations with caregiver burden (<em>r</em> = 0.384, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and anxiety (<em>r</em> = 0.296, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The average MSPD score of the total sample was 2.21 ± 0.90, which was higher in caregivers of children with structural malformations than those with nonstructural malformations. The group discrimination scores were higher than the individual discrimination scores, and the subtle discrimination scores were higher than the blatant discrimination scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The MSPD-C demonstrates robust reliability and validity and could be used as an effective tool to measure perceived discrimination among caregivers of children with congenital disorders. Further application and validation with other populations and in other countries are recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105006"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422225000903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 对194名先天性疾病患儿的照顾者进行了心理测量测试,通过计算Cronbach's α检验内部一致性。在随机抽取的 30 名参与者中计算了重测信度。通过确认性因子分析(CFA)检验了因子结构,并通过研究 MSPD-C 与照顾者负担和焦虑的相关性检验了并发有效性。CFA 支持四因素模型,拟合优度指数最高(χ2/df = 2.022,RMSEA = 0.073,SRMR = 0.035,CFI = 0.938,TLI = 0.928)。MSPD-C 与照顾者负担(r = 0.384,P <0.01)和焦虑(r = 0.296,P <0.01)呈显著正相关,这进一步证明了 MSPD-C 的并发有效性。总样本的 MSPD 平均得分为 2.21 ± 0.90,结构畸形患儿护理者的得分高于非结构畸形患儿护理者。结论 MSPD-C具有很高的信度和效度,可作为测量先天性疾病患儿看护者歧视感的有效工具。建议在其他人群和其他国家进一步应用和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation and validation of the multidimensional scale of perceived discrimination (MSPD) among Chinese caregivers of children with congenital disorders

Aims

The original English version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Discrimination (MSPD) was translated and cross-culturally adapted into a Chinese version (MSPD-C).

Methods

Psychometric testing was conducted among 194 caregivers of children with congenital disorders. Internal consistency was tested by calculating Cronbach's α. Test-retest reliability was calculated among 30 participants selected randomly to complete the questionnaire again in 2 weeks. Factor structure was tested with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and concurrent validity was examined by investigating the correlations of the MSPD-C with caregiver burden and anxiety.

Results

The Cronbach's α coefficient for MSPD-C is 0.979, and the test-retest reliability values is 0.905. CFA supported the four-factor model with the best goodness-of-fit indices (χ2/df = 2.022, RMSEA = 0.073, SRMR = 0.035, CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.928). The concurrent validity of the MSPD-C was further supported by its significant positive correlations with caregiver burden (r = 0.384, P < 0.01) and anxiety (r = 0.296, P < 0.01). The average MSPD score of the total sample was 2.21 ± 0.90, which was higher in caregivers of children with structural malformations than those with nonstructural malformations. The group discrimination scores were higher than the individual discrimination scores, and the subtle discrimination scores were higher than the blatant discrimination scores.

Conclusions

The MSPD-C demonstrates robust reliability and validity and could be used as an effective tool to measure perceived discrimination among caregivers of children with congenital disorders. Further application and validation with other populations and in other countries are recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信