Elise Koch, Sophie Smart, Guðmundur Einarsson, Anders Kämpe, Lina Jonsson, Maris Alver, Matthew Iveson, Andreas Göteson, Antonio F Pardiñas, Ida E Sønderby, Kevin S O'Connell, Qingqin Li, Yi Lu, Hreinn Stefánsson, Kári Stefánsson, Heather Whalley, Mikael Landén, Michael C O'Donovan, Knut Smerud, Gerard R Dawson, Ole A Andreassen
{"title":"使用真实世界数据确定主要精神疾病治疗结果的建议","authors":"Elise Koch, Sophie Smart, Guðmundur Einarsson, Anders Kämpe, Lina Jonsson, Maris Alver, Matthew Iveson, Andreas Göteson, Antonio F Pardiñas, Ida E Sønderby, Kevin S O'Connell, Qingqin Li, Yi Lu, Hreinn Stefánsson, Kári Stefánsson, Heather Whalley, Mikael Landén, Michael C O'Donovan, Knut Smerud, Gerard R Dawson, Ole A Andreassen","doi":"10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00061-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although information from real-world data can be used to identify factors that aid treatment choice, there are no guidelines for the use of such data. The aim of this Review is to summarise and evaluate definitions of treatment outcomes for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilisers when using real-world data, and to suggest standards for the field. Given that no standards for the use of these data in estimating treatment outcomes exist, variability is high for treatment outcome definitions. We make recommendations for different scenarios of available data and highlight the importance of using other sources of information to validate proxy measures such as continued treatment, switching between medications, or polypharmacy of psychotropic medications. Well defined and validated treatment outcome measures that incorporate real-world data could facilitate the development of precision psychiatry approaches and support regulatory decision making regarding psychopharmacological agents.","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for defining treatment outcomes in major psychiatric disorders using real-world data\",\"authors\":\"Elise Koch, Sophie Smart, Guðmundur Einarsson, Anders Kämpe, Lina Jonsson, Maris Alver, Matthew Iveson, Andreas Göteson, Antonio F Pardiñas, Ida E Sønderby, Kevin S O'Connell, Qingqin Li, Yi Lu, Hreinn Stefánsson, Kári Stefánsson, Heather Whalley, Mikael Landén, Michael C O'Donovan, Knut Smerud, Gerard R Dawson, Ole A Andreassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00061-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although information from real-world data can be used to identify factors that aid treatment choice, there are no guidelines for the use of such data. The aim of this Review is to summarise and evaluate definitions of treatment outcomes for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilisers when using real-world data, and to suggest standards for the field. Given that no standards for the use of these data in estimating treatment outcomes exist, variability is high for treatment outcome definitions. We make recommendations for different scenarios of available data and highlight the importance of using other sources of information to validate proxy measures such as continued treatment, switching between medications, or polypharmacy of psychotropic medications. Well defined and validated treatment outcome measures that incorporate real-world data could facilitate the development of precision psychiatry approaches and support regulatory decision making regarding psychopharmacological agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":30.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00061-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00061-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recommendations for defining treatment outcomes in major psychiatric disorders using real-world data
Although information from real-world data can be used to identify factors that aid treatment choice, there are no guidelines for the use of such data. The aim of this Review is to summarise and evaluate definitions of treatment outcomes for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilisers when using real-world data, and to suggest standards for the field. Given that no standards for the use of these data in estimating treatment outcomes exist, variability is high for treatment outcome definitions. We make recommendations for different scenarios of available data and highlight the importance of using other sources of information to validate proxy measures such as continued treatment, switching between medications, or polypharmacy of psychotropic medications. Well defined and validated treatment outcome measures that incorporate real-world data could facilitate the development of precision psychiatry approaches and support regulatory decision making regarding psychopharmacological agents.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.