配送和拆卸成本与仓储成本之间的物流权衡

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Katrien Storms, Thierry Vanelslander, Edwin van Hassel
{"title":"配送和拆卸成本与仓储成本之间的物流权衡","authors":"Katrien Storms,&nbsp;Thierry Vanelslander,&nbsp;Edwin van Hassel","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyses the impact of container demurrage and detention (D&amp;D) on the total logistics costs (TLC) of a shipper. More specifically, it looks into how these costs influence the decision to store cargo in a container throughout the hinterland chain or in a warehouse. To do this, a case study with company-specific data is implemented. The findings show, first of all, that the lead time plays an important role in whether D&amp;D occurs. Longer lead times exceeding the D&amp;D free time result in D&amp;D costs which increase the shippers’ TLC considerably. Second, the impact of D&amp;D on the TLC is shipping line dependent. Hence, shippers can limit the TLC increase by choosing shipping lines that offer more free time for intermodal transport. Third, increases in the warehousing cost component can result in higher TLC compared to the TLC when D&amp;D charges occur, suggesting that it might become more interesting for the shipper to store its goods in the container throughout the hinterland chain and thus pay D&amp;D instead of in a warehouse. These results, although case-dependent, give insights into alternative storage options throughout the chain and their costs for shippers as well as that incurring D&amp;D charges can be acceptable under certain logistics strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The logistics trade-off between D&D and warehousing costs\",\"authors\":\"Katrien Storms,&nbsp;Thierry Vanelslander,&nbsp;Edwin van Hassel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study analyses the impact of container demurrage and detention (D&amp;D) on the total logistics costs (TLC) of a shipper. More specifically, it looks into how these costs influence the decision to store cargo in a container throughout the hinterland chain or in a warehouse. To do this, a case study with company-specific data is implemented. The findings show, first of all, that the lead time plays an important role in whether D&amp;D occurs. Longer lead times exceeding the D&amp;D free time result in D&amp;D costs which increase the shippers’ TLC considerably. Second, the impact of D&amp;D on the TLC is shipping line dependent. Hence, shippers can limit the TLC increase by choosing shipping lines that offer more free time for intermodal transport. Third, increases in the warehousing cost component can result in higher TLC compared to the TLC when D&amp;D charges occur, suggesting that it might become more interesting for the shipper to store its goods in the container throughout the hinterland chain and thus pay D&amp;D instead of in a warehouse. These results, although case-dependent, give insights into alternative storage options throughout the chain and their costs for shippers as well as that incurring D&amp;D charges can be acceptable under certain logistics strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The logistics trade-off between D&D and warehousing costs
This study analyses the impact of container demurrage and detention (D&D) on the total logistics costs (TLC) of a shipper. More specifically, it looks into how these costs influence the decision to store cargo in a container throughout the hinterland chain or in a warehouse. To do this, a case study with company-specific data is implemented. The findings show, first of all, that the lead time plays an important role in whether D&D occurs. Longer lead times exceeding the D&D free time result in D&D costs which increase the shippers’ TLC considerably. Second, the impact of D&D on the TLC is shipping line dependent. Hence, shippers can limit the TLC increase by choosing shipping lines that offer more free time for intermodal transport. Third, increases in the warehousing cost component can result in higher TLC compared to the TLC when D&D charges occur, suggesting that it might become more interesting for the shipper to store its goods in the container throughout the hinterland chain and thus pay D&D instead of in a warehouse. These results, although case-dependent, give insights into alternative storage options throughout the chain and their costs for shippers as well as that incurring D&D charges can be acceptable under certain logistics strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信