{"title":"利用定量和定性PCR技术鉴定肉制品中的物种,重点是鸡肉的检测","authors":"Zahra Sarlak , Nayebali Rezvani , Ehsan Parandi , Nasrin Karami , Maryam Azizi-Lalabadi , Milad Rouhi","doi":"10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Undeclared adulteration of chicken in processed meat products is commonly reported because of easier and cheaper access. As a result, authenticating techniques should be applied to evaluate their existence in these products. The DNA's higher stability during processing than lipids and proteins makes DNA-based techniques ideal for meat authenticity and traceability. Among these, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are reliable, highly sensitive, and specific for detecting species origin in foodstuffs. DNA-based methods are divided into two categories including qualitative (species-specific PCR, PCR-RFLP, and DNA barcoding) and quantitative (real-time PCR, droplet-digital PCR, and next-generation sequencing-based DNA metabarcoding) assays. Therefore, the present review intends to critically investigate the principles, advantages, challenges, and advances of PCR techniques, and their practicality for the detection of undeclared chicken in meat products. Among qualitative PCR techniques, capillary and microchip electrophoresis assays could simultaneously detect the animal species with a lower limit of detection than traditional gel electrophoresis. Nevertheless, the detection of undeclared species may occur due to accidental cross-contamination with minute quantities of various meat species during food processing. Quantitative PCR methods, on the other hand, are capable of distinguishing between deliberate and unintentional mislabeling. Additionally, despite the higher cost, NGS-assisted DNA sequencing surpasses other species authentication methods as it can quantitatively identify all target and non-target species using high-quality barcode sequence reference databases. This review could act as a reference guide for researchers, DNA-based technique developers, and regulatory authorities seeking to enhance the global standard protocol for chicken identification in meat products through PCR methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12409,"journal":{"name":"Food Bioscience","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 106568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species identification in meat products using quantitative and qualitative PCR techniques, with emphasis on chicken detection\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Sarlak , Nayebali Rezvani , Ehsan Parandi , Nasrin Karami , Maryam Azizi-Lalabadi , Milad Rouhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Undeclared adulteration of chicken in processed meat products is commonly reported because of easier and cheaper access. As a result, authenticating techniques should be applied to evaluate their existence in these products. The DNA's higher stability during processing than lipids and proteins makes DNA-based techniques ideal for meat authenticity and traceability. Among these, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are reliable, highly sensitive, and specific for detecting species origin in foodstuffs. DNA-based methods are divided into two categories including qualitative (species-specific PCR, PCR-RFLP, and DNA barcoding) and quantitative (real-time PCR, droplet-digital PCR, and next-generation sequencing-based DNA metabarcoding) assays. Therefore, the present review intends to critically investigate the principles, advantages, challenges, and advances of PCR techniques, and their practicality for the detection of undeclared chicken in meat products. Among qualitative PCR techniques, capillary and microchip electrophoresis assays could simultaneously detect the animal species with a lower limit of detection than traditional gel electrophoresis. Nevertheless, the detection of undeclared species may occur due to accidental cross-contamination with minute quantities of various meat species during food processing. Quantitative PCR methods, on the other hand, are capable of distinguishing between deliberate and unintentional mislabeling. Additionally, despite the higher cost, NGS-assisted DNA sequencing surpasses other species authentication methods as it can quantitatively identify all target and non-target species using high-quality barcode sequence reference databases. This review could act as a reference guide for researchers, DNA-based technique developers, and regulatory authorities seeking to enhance the global standard protocol for chicken identification in meat products through PCR methodologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Bioscience\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Bioscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212429225007448\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212429225007448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Species identification in meat products using quantitative and qualitative PCR techniques, with emphasis on chicken detection
Undeclared adulteration of chicken in processed meat products is commonly reported because of easier and cheaper access. As a result, authenticating techniques should be applied to evaluate their existence in these products. The DNA's higher stability during processing than lipids and proteins makes DNA-based techniques ideal for meat authenticity and traceability. Among these, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are reliable, highly sensitive, and specific for detecting species origin in foodstuffs. DNA-based methods are divided into two categories including qualitative (species-specific PCR, PCR-RFLP, and DNA barcoding) and quantitative (real-time PCR, droplet-digital PCR, and next-generation sequencing-based DNA metabarcoding) assays. Therefore, the present review intends to critically investigate the principles, advantages, challenges, and advances of PCR techniques, and their practicality for the detection of undeclared chicken in meat products. Among qualitative PCR techniques, capillary and microchip electrophoresis assays could simultaneously detect the animal species with a lower limit of detection than traditional gel electrophoresis. Nevertheless, the detection of undeclared species may occur due to accidental cross-contamination with minute quantities of various meat species during food processing. Quantitative PCR methods, on the other hand, are capable of distinguishing between deliberate and unintentional mislabeling. Additionally, despite the higher cost, NGS-assisted DNA sequencing surpasses other species authentication methods as it can quantitatively identify all target and non-target species using high-quality barcode sequence reference databases. This review could act as a reference guide for researchers, DNA-based technique developers, and regulatory authorities seeking to enhance the global standard protocol for chicken identification in meat products through PCR methodologies.
Food BioscienceBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
671
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍:
Food Bioscience is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide a forum for recent developments in the field of bio-related food research. The journal focuses on both fundamental and applied research worldwide, with special attention to ethnic and cultural aspects of food bioresearch.