零碳建筑中的电动汽车集成:对碳排放和经济绩效的影响分析

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Yuying Sun , Yinglong Wang , Xinyan Yang , Wei Wang , Wei Zhao , Qingdong Zhang , Jiangang Yao , Can Chen , Wenzhe Wei
{"title":"零碳建筑中的电动汽车集成:对碳排放和经济绩效的影响分析","authors":"Yuying Sun ,&nbsp;Yinglong Wang ,&nbsp;Xinyan Yang ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Zhao ,&nbsp;Qingdong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiangang Yao ,&nbsp;Can Chen ,&nbsp;Wenzhe Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) offers a promising solution to mitigate the supply–demand energy mismatch in buildings. However, existing studies have focused on the economic benefits of integrating EVs into buildings, with limited guidance on their application in promoting zero-carbon building development. To fill this gap, this study proposes a dual-layer optimization approach combining day-ahead EV scheduling and V2B bidirectional charger configuration, targeting both economic and carbon emissions objectives. This approach was applied to a typical zero-carbon building in Beijing, China, and a multi-time-scale analysis was conducted to explore the changes in economic cost and carbon emissions with varying configuration of EV chargers. Results show that optimizing for economic benefits can reduce costs by up to 25.38%, but at the cost of a 17.03% increase in carbon emissions. Conversely, prioritizing carbon emissions leads to a reduction of up to 12.47%, but with more modest economic savings of 12.08%. These findings highlight the importance of balancing carbon emissions reduction with cost efficiency when defining optimization objectives. Strict carbon reduction targets require constraints on EV charging behaviors, potentially compromising economic benefits. Furthermore, the study reveals that, under current electricity prices and battery costs, effective peak-valley arbitrage using EVs remains challenging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 115674"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electric Vehicle integration in Zero-Carbon Buildings: Analyzing the impact on carbon emissions and economic performance\",\"authors\":\"Yuying Sun ,&nbsp;Yinglong Wang ,&nbsp;Xinyan Yang ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Zhao ,&nbsp;Qingdong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiangang Yao ,&nbsp;Can Chen ,&nbsp;Wenzhe Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) offers a promising solution to mitigate the supply–demand energy mismatch in buildings. However, existing studies have focused on the economic benefits of integrating EVs into buildings, with limited guidance on their application in promoting zero-carbon building development. To fill this gap, this study proposes a dual-layer optimization approach combining day-ahead EV scheduling and V2B bidirectional charger configuration, targeting both economic and carbon emissions objectives. This approach was applied to a typical zero-carbon building in Beijing, China, and a multi-time-scale analysis was conducted to explore the changes in economic cost and carbon emissions with varying configuration of EV chargers. Results show that optimizing for economic benefits can reduce costs by up to 25.38%, but at the cost of a 17.03% increase in carbon emissions. Conversely, prioritizing carbon emissions leads to a reduction of up to 12.47%, but with more modest economic savings of 12.08%. These findings highlight the importance of balancing carbon emissions reduction with cost efficiency when defining optimization objectives. Strict carbon reduction targets require constraints on EV charging behaviors, potentially compromising economic benefits. Furthermore, the study reveals that, under current electricity prices and battery costs, effective peak-valley arbitrage using EVs remains challenging.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":\"338 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825004049\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825004049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电动汽车(ev)的广泛采用为缓解建筑中供需能源不匹配提供了一个有希望的解决方案。然而,现有的研究主要集中在将电动汽车融入建筑的经济效益上,对其在促进零碳建筑发展中的应用指导有限。为了填补这一空白,本研究提出了一种结合日前电动汽车调度和V2B双向充电器配置的双层优化方法,以经济和碳排放为目标。以北京某典型的零碳建筑为例,通过多时间尺度的分析,探讨了电动汽车充电器配置不同对经济成本和碳排放的影响。结果表明,经济效益优化可使成本降低25.38%,但代价是碳排放增加17.03%。相反,优先考虑碳排放可以减少高达12.47%的碳排放,但经济上的节省则更为温和,只有12.08%。这些发现强调了在确定优化目标时平衡碳减排与成本效率的重要性。严格的碳减排目标要求限制电动汽车的充电行为,这可能会损害经济效益。此外,研究表明,在当前的电价和电池成本下,使用电动汽车进行有效的峰谷套利仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electric Vehicle integration in Zero-Carbon Buildings: Analyzing the impact on carbon emissions and economic performance
The widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) offers a promising solution to mitigate the supply–demand energy mismatch in buildings. However, existing studies have focused on the economic benefits of integrating EVs into buildings, with limited guidance on their application in promoting zero-carbon building development. To fill this gap, this study proposes a dual-layer optimization approach combining day-ahead EV scheduling and V2B bidirectional charger configuration, targeting both economic and carbon emissions objectives. This approach was applied to a typical zero-carbon building in Beijing, China, and a multi-time-scale analysis was conducted to explore the changes in economic cost and carbon emissions with varying configuration of EV chargers. Results show that optimizing for economic benefits can reduce costs by up to 25.38%, but at the cost of a 17.03% increase in carbon emissions. Conversely, prioritizing carbon emissions leads to a reduction of up to 12.47%, but with more modest economic savings of 12.08%. These findings highlight the importance of balancing carbon emissions reduction with cost efficiency when defining optimization objectives. Strict carbon reduction targets require constraints on EV charging behaviors, potentially compromising economic benefits. Furthermore, the study reveals that, under current electricity prices and battery costs, effective peak-valley arbitrage using EVs remains challenging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信