基于仿真的不同气候条件下办公建筑成本响应式送风温度控制策略评价

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Yan Wang , Paul Raftery , Carlos Duarte , Rupam Singla , Tharanga Jayarathne , Curtis Fong
{"title":"基于仿真的不同气候条件下办公建筑成本响应式送风温度控制策略评价","authors":"Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Paul Raftery ,&nbsp;Carlos Duarte ,&nbsp;Rupam Singla ,&nbsp;Tharanga Jayarathne ,&nbsp;Curtis Fong","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The supply air temperature (SAT) setpoint control strategy is a vital part of a variable air volume (VAV) system. This paper presents a new cost-responsive (CORE) SAT control algorithm for the VAV system which does not require discharge air temperature data for easier implementation, along with a new humidity control strategy that constrains the maximum SAT based on outdoor dewpoint temperature to meet dehumidification requirements in humid climates. We conducted a comprehensive parametric simulation study using a representative office building model to assess energy cost savings of the new CORE control algorithm against other widely adopted control strategies, including the best industry practice ASHRAE Guideline 36 (G36). We created an EnergyPlus-Python-based simulation environment to implement all control algorithms. Results showed that the new CORE algorithm consistently yielded higher energy cost savings than other control algorithms, despite variations in climate, energy tariff structure, and building design and operation. Compared to G36, the new CORE algorithm reduced energy costs by a mean (first – third quartiles) of ∼ 4 % (0.8–6.9 %) across all simulated cases. Moreover, the climatic conditions had a significant impact on the control performance. In milder climates, the new CORE algorithm achieved higher energy cost savings due to considerable economizer hours, e.g., with ∼ 7 % (6.3–7.1 %) savings compared to G36 and ∼ 31 % (26.8–36.0 %) compared to the worst-performing fixed SAT strategy for Oakland. Conversely, in more extreme climates with fewer economizer hours and dehumidification constraints, energy cost savings of the new CORE algorithm were diminished, e.g., with 0.6 % (0.2–0.7 %) savings relative to G36 and 5.4 % (4.3–6.2 %) relative to the least effective Warmest SAT strategy for New York City. These findings demonstrate the potential of the new CORE SAT control strategy to reduce HVAC operating costs while maintaining occupant comfort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 115665"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-Based evaluation of Cost-Responsive supply air temperature control strategy for office buildings across different climates\",\"authors\":\"Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Paul Raftery ,&nbsp;Carlos Duarte ,&nbsp;Rupam Singla ,&nbsp;Tharanga Jayarathne ,&nbsp;Curtis Fong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The supply air temperature (SAT) setpoint control strategy is a vital part of a variable air volume (VAV) system. This paper presents a new cost-responsive (CORE) SAT control algorithm for the VAV system which does not require discharge air temperature data for easier implementation, along with a new humidity control strategy that constrains the maximum SAT based on outdoor dewpoint temperature to meet dehumidification requirements in humid climates. We conducted a comprehensive parametric simulation study using a representative office building model to assess energy cost savings of the new CORE control algorithm against other widely adopted control strategies, including the best industry practice ASHRAE Guideline 36 (G36). We created an EnergyPlus-Python-based simulation environment to implement all control algorithms. Results showed that the new CORE algorithm consistently yielded higher energy cost savings than other control algorithms, despite variations in climate, energy tariff structure, and building design and operation. Compared to G36, the new CORE algorithm reduced energy costs by a mean (first – third quartiles) of ∼ 4 % (0.8–6.9 %) across all simulated cases. Moreover, the climatic conditions had a significant impact on the control performance. In milder climates, the new CORE algorithm achieved higher energy cost savings due to considerable economizer hours, e.g., with ∼ 7 % (6.3–7.1 %) savings compared to G36 and ∼ 31 % (26.8–36.0 %) compared to the worst-performing fixed SAT strategy for Oakland. Conversely, in more extreme climates with fewer economizer hours and dehumidification constraints, energy cost savings of the new CORE algorithm were diminished, e.g., with 0.6 % (0.2–0.7 %) savings relative to G36 and 5.4 % (4.3–6.2 %) relative to the least effective Warmest SAT strategy for New York City. These findings demonstrate the potential of the new CORE SAT control strategy to reduce HVAC operating costs while maintaining occupant comfort.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":\"338 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825003950\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825003950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

送风温度(SAT)设定值控制策略是变风量系统的重要组成部分。本文提出了一种新的成本响应(CORE)卫星控制算法,该算法不需要排放空气温度数据,以便于实施,同时提出了一种新的湿度控制策略,该策略根据室外露点温度约束最大卫星,以满足潮湿气候条件下的除湿要求。我们使用代表性办公楼模型进行了全面的参数模拟研究,以评估新的CORE控制算法与其他广泛采用的控制策略(包括最佳行业实践ASHRAE指南36 (G36))的能源成本节约。我们创建了一个基于energyplus - python的仿真环境来实现所有控制算法。结果表明,尽管气候、能源关税结构、建筑设计和运行存在差异,但新的CORE算法始终比其他控制算法产生更高的能源成本节约。与G36相比,新的CORE算法在所有模拟情况下平均(第一-第三个四分位数)降低了约4%(0.8 - 6.9%)的能源成本。此外,气候条件对控制效果有显著影响。在较温和的气候条件下,由于节省了大量的节约时间,新的CORE算法实现了更高的能源成本节约,例如,与G36相比节省了~ 7%(6.3 - 7.1%),与奥克兰表现最差的固定SAT策略相比节省了~ 31%(26.8 - 36.0%)。相反,在更极端的气候条件下,节能器小时数和除湿限制更少,新CORE算法的能源成本节约减少,例如,相对于G36节省0.6%(0.2 - 0.7%),相对于纽约市最不有效的最温暖SAT策略节省5.4%(4.3 - 6.2%)。这些发现证明了新的CORE SAT控制策略在降低暖通空调运行成本的同时保持居住者舒适度的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation-Based evaluation of Cost-Responsive supply air temperature control strategy for office buildings across different climates
The supply air temperature (SAT) setpoint control strategy is a vital part of a variable air volume (VAV) system. This paper presents a new cost-responsive (CORE) SAT control algorithm for the VAV system which does not require discharge air temperature data for easier implementation, along with a new humidity control strategy that constrains the maximum SAT based on outdoor dewpoint temperature to meet dehumidification requirements in humid climates. We conducted a comprehensive parametric simulation study using a representative office building model to assess energy cost savings of the new CORE control algorithm against other widely adopted control strategies, including the best industry practice ASHRAE Guideline 36 (G36). We created an EnergyPlus-Python-based simulation environment to implement all control algorithms. Results showed that the new CORE algorithm consistently yielded higher energy cost savings than other control algorithms, despite variations in climate, energy tariff structure, and building design and operation. Compared to G36, the new CORE algorithm reduced energy costs by a mean (first – third quartiles) of ∼ 4 % (0.8–6.9 %) across all simulated cases. Moreover, the climatic conditions had a significant impact on the control performance. In milder climates, the new CORE algorithm achieved higher energy cost savings due to considerable economizer hours, e.g., with ∼ 7 % (6.3–7.1 %) savings compared to G36 and ∼ 31 % (26.8–36.0 %) compared to the worst-performing fixed SAT strategy for Oakland. Conversely, in more extreme climates with fewer economizer hours and dehumidification constraints, energy cost savings of the new CORE algorithm were diminished, e.g., with 0.6 % (0.2–0.7 %) savings relative to G36 and 5.4 % (4.3–6.2 %) relative to the least effective Warmest SAT strategy for New York City. These findings demonstrate the potential of the new CORE SAT control strategy to reduce HVAC operating costs while maintaining occupant comfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信