慢性非特异性颈痛的放松技巧:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Julián Ángel Basco-López, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Ana Torres-Costoso, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, Purificación López-Muñoz, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Juan Avendaño-Coy, Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez
{"title":"慢性非特异性颈痛的放松技巧:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Julián Ángel Basco-López, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Ana Torres-Costoso, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, Purificación López-Muñoz, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Juan Avendaño-Coy, Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1037/hea0001486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although previous evidence has shown positive results of conservative interventions on chronic pain, the specific effect of relaxation techniques on chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) has not been studied. Thus, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of relaxation techniques on neck pain intensity and pain-related disability in this population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically searched five databases from inception to November 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of relaxation techniques versus physical therapy interventions and versus control on pain intensity and pain-related disability. A random-effect method was used for pooling the standardized mean difference and its related 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the DerSimonian-Laird method. Meta-regression models were conducted to determine the influence of age, sex, and intervention characteristics on the effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies involving 1,384 adults (aged 30-56 years) with CNNP were included. The pooled standardized mean difference for relaxation techniques versus physical therapy intervention was not significantly different for pain intensity (-0.14; 95% CI = [-0.57, 0.30]) or pain-related disability (-0.02; 95% CI = [-0.37, 0.34]). Compared with the control condition, the relaxation technique significantly improved pain intensity (-0.48; 95% CI = [-0.79, -0.16]) and pain-related disability (-0.45; 95% CI = [-0.79, -0.11]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relaxation techniques should be considered as an effective therapeutic strategy in the rehabilitation of CNNP since they may have a moderate effect on reducing pain and disability compared to the control condition. However, no differences were observed between relaxation techniques and physical therapy interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relaxation techniques in chronic nonspecific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Julián Ángel Basco-López, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Ana Torres-Costoso, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, Purificación López-Muñoz, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Juan Avendaño-Coy, Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although previous evidence has shown positive results of conservative interventions on chronic pain, the specific effect of relaxation techniques on chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) has not been studied. Thus, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of relaxation techniques on neck pain intensity and pain-related disability in this population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically searched five databases from inception to November 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of relaxation techniques versus physical therapy interventions and versus control on pain intensity and pain-related disability. A random-effect method was used for pooling the standardized mean difference and its related 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the DerSimonian-Laird method. Meta-regression models were conducted to determine the influence of age, sex, and intervention characteristics on the effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies involving 1,384 adults (aged 30-56 years) with CNNP were included. The pooled standardized mean difference for relaxation techniques versus physical therapy intervention was not significantly different for pain intensity (-0.14; 95% CI = [-0.57, 0.30]) or pain-related disability (-0.02; 95% CI = [-0.37, 0.34]). Compared with the control condition, the relaxation technique significantly improved pain intensity (-0.48; 95% CI = [-0.79, -0.16]) and pain-related disability (-0.45; 95% CI = [-0.79, -0.11]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relaxation techniques should be considered as an effective therapeutic strategy in the rehabilitation of CNNP since they may have a moderate effect on reducing pain and disability compared to the control condition. However, no differences were observed between relaxation techniques and physical therapy interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001486\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然先前的证据表明保守干预对慢性疼痛有积极的效果,但放松技术对慢性非特异性颈部疼痛(CNNP)的具体效果尚未研究。因此,本研究旨在确定放松技术对该人群颈部疼痛强度和疼痛相关残疾的有效性。方法:我们系统地检索了5个数据库,从成立到2023年11月进行随机对照试验,比较放松技术与物理治疗干预和对照对疼痛强度和疼痛相关残疾的影响。采用随机效应法与dersimonan - laird方法合并标准化平均差及其相关95%置信区间(ci)。采用元回归模型来确定年龄、性别和干预特征对效果估计的影响。结果:共纳入16项研究,涉及1384名CNNP成人(30-56岁)。放松技术与物理治疗干预在疼痛强度方面的合并标准化平均差异无显著差异(-0.14;95% CI =[-0.57, 0.30])或疼痛相关残疾(-0.02;95% ci =[-0.37, 0.34])。与对照组相比,放松技术显著提高了疼痛强度(-0.48;95% CI =[-0.79, -0.16])和疼痛相关残疾(-0.45;95% ci =[-0.79, -0.11])。结论:与对照组相比,放松技术在减轻疼痛和残疾方面可能具有中等效果,因此应考虑将其作为CNNP康复的有效治疗策略。然而,在放松技术和物理治疗干预之间没有观察到差异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relaxation techniques in chronic nonspecific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Although previous evidence has shown positive results of conservative interventions on chronic pain, the specific effect of relaxation techniques on chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) has not been studied. Thus, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of relaxation techniques on neck pain intensity and pain-related disability in this population.

Method: We systematically searched five databases from inception to November 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of relaxation techniques versus physical therapy interventions and versus control on pain intensity and pain-related disability. A random-effect method was used for pooling the standardized mean difference and its related 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the DerSimonian-Laird method. Meta-regression models were conducted to determine the influence of age, sex, and intervention characteristics on the effect estimates.

Results: A total of 16 studies involving 1,384 adults (aged 30-56 years) with CNNP were included. The pooled standardized mean difference for relaxation techniques versus physical therapy intervention was not significantly different for pain intensity (-0.14; 95% CI = [-0.57, 0.30]) or pain-related disability (-0.02; 95% CI = [-0.37, 0.34]). Compared with the control condition, the relaxation technique significantly improved pain intensity (-0.48; 95% CI = [-0.79, -0.16]) and pain-related disability (-0.45; 95% CI = [-0.79, -0.11]).

Conclusion: Relaxation techniques should be considered as an effective therapeutic strategy in the rehabilitation of CNNP since they may have a moderate effect on reducing pain and disability compared to the control condition. However, no differences were observed between relaxation techniques and physical therapy interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信