尊重预先指示:依从性和对护理价值影响的范围审查。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Angus Hayes Chatham, Jeremy A Balch, Philip Hong, Naveen Baskaran, Lauren Manganiello, Kenneth L Abbott, Marcia Brown, Azra Bihorac, Philip A Efron, Benjamin Shickel, Ray Moseley, Tyler J Loftus
{"title":"尊重预先指示:依从性和对护理价值影响的范围审查。","authors":"Angus Hayes Chatham, Jeremy A Balch, Philip Hong, Naveen Baskaran, Lauren Manganiello, Kenneth L Abbott, Marcia Brown, Azra Bihorac, Philip A Efron, Benjamin Shickel, Ray Moseley, Tyler J Loftus","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> End-of-life clinical decision making can trigger profound emotional and financial distress. Advance directives intend to guide clinicians and surrogate decision makers; it is difficult to know how often they are honored. Moreover, there is limited research on associations between resource use and honoring advance directives. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a scoping review of primary research articles on Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed using search terms involving honoring of advance directives and associations with health care value. Value was defined broadly and included any study in which the quality of care was assessed relative to cost. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, with 17 related to honoring advance directives, six related to the value of care, and seven examining both dimensions. Evidence regarding advance directive efficacy was mixed. Ten of 23 (43%) demonstrated a positive impact of advance directives on concordant care, ten showed minimal or no care differences between patients with and without advance directives, and three showed mixed evidence. Higher rates of concordant care were associated with do-not-hospitalize orders and physician-orders-for-life-sustaining-treatment as compared to other types. Concerning value, four studies showed reduced hospital length of stay, hospital admissions, and overall costs, whereas five found no difference in these variables. Four considered theoretical value impacts of advance directives on patients, hospitals, and health systems with value varying by stakeholder. There was limited analysis of advance directive implementation practices. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There is mixed evidence related to the efficacy of advance directives in aligning care with patient wishes and improving the quality of care relative to cost. Investigation of implementation practices may provide insight into factors determining these varied outcomes. This review highlights opportunities to improve upon methodology for studying advance directives and applying them effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Honoring Advance Directives: A Scoping Review of Adherence and Impact on Value of Care.\",\"authors\":\"Angus Hayes Chatham, Jeremy A Balch, Philip Hong, Naveen Baskaran, Lauren Manganiello, Kenneth L Abbott, Marcia Brown, Azra Bihorac, Philip A Efron, Benjamin Shickel, Ray Moseley, Tyler J Loftus\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> End-of-life clinical decision making can trigger profound emotional and financial distress. Advance directives intend to guide clinicians and surrogate decision makers; it is difficult to know how often they are honored. Moreover, there is limited research on associations between resource use and honoring advance directives. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a scoping review of primary research articles on Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed using search terms involving honoring of advance directives and associations with health care value. Value was defined broadly and included any study in which the quality of care was assessed relative to cost. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, with 17 related to honoring advance directives, six related to the value of care, and seven examining both dimensions. Evidence regarding advance directive efficacy was mixed. Ten of 23 (43%) demonstrated a positive impact of advance directives on concordant care, ten showed minimal or no care differences between patients with and without advance directives, and three showed mixed evidence. Higher rates of concordant care were associated with do-not-hospitalize orders and physician-orders-for-life-sustaining-treatment as compared to other types. Concerning value, four studies showed reduced hospital length of stay, hospital admissions, and overall costs, whereas five found no difference in these variables. Four considered theoretical value impacts of advance directives on patients, hospitals, and health systems with value varying by stakeholder. There was limited analysis of advance directive implementation practices. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There is mixed evidence related to the efficacy of advance directives in aligning care with patient wishes and improving the quality of care relative to cost. Investigation of implementation practices may provide insight into factors determining these varied outcomes. This review highlights opportunities to improve upon methodology for studying advance directives and applying them effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:临终临床决策可以引发深刻的情感和经济困扰。预先指示旨在指导临床医生和替代决策者;很难知道他们多久被授予荣誉。此外,关于资源利用与遵守事前指示之间关系的研究有限。方法:我们对Web of Science、Embase和PubMed上的主要研究文章进行了范围审查,使用涉及尊重预先指示和与医疗保健价值相关的搜索词。价值的定义很宽泛,包括任何评估护理质量相对于成本的研究。结果:29项研究符合纳入标准,其中17项与尊重预先指示有关,6项与护理价值有关,7项同时检查两个维度。关于预先指示有效性的证据好坏参半。23例中有10例(43%)显示了预先指示对和谐护理的积极影响,10例显示有和没有预先指示的患者之间的护理差异很小或没有差异,3例显示混合证据。与其他类型相比,较高的和谐护理率与不住院医嘱和医生维持生命治疗医嘱相关。关于价值,四项研究显示住院时间、住院次数和总体成本减少,而五项研究发现这些变量没有差异。四项考虑了预先指示对患者、医院和卫生系统的理论价值影响,价值因利益相关者而异。对预先指示执行实践的分析有限。结论:关于预先指示在使护理符合患者意愿和提高相对于成本的护理质量方面的功效,有各种各样的证据。对实现实践的调查可以提供对决定这些不同结果的因素的洞察。这篇综述强调了改进研究预先指示和有效应用它们的方法的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Honoring Advance Directives: A Scoping Review of Adherence and Impact on Value of Care.

Introduction: End-of-life clinical decision making can trigger profound emotional and financial distress. Advance directives intend to guide clinicians and surrogate decision makers; it is difficult to know how often they are honored. Moreover, there is limited research on associations between resource use and honoring advance directives. Methods: We performed a scoping review of primary research articles on Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed using search terms involving honoring of advance directives and associations with health care value. Value was defined broadly and included any study in which the quality of care was assessed relative to cost. Results: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, with 17 related to honoring advance directives, six related to the value of care, and seven examining both dimensions. Evidence regarding advance directive efficacy was mixed. Ten of 23 (43%) demonstrated a positive impact of advance directives on concordant care, ten showed minimal or no care differences between patients with and without advance directives, and three showed mixed evidence. Higher rates of concordant care were associated with do-not-hospitalize orders and physician-orders-for-life-sustaining-treatment as compared to other types. Concerning value, four studies showed reduced hospital length of stay, hospital admissions, and overall costs, whereas five found no difference in these variables. Four considered theoretical value impacts of advance directives on patients, hospitals, and health systems with value varying by stakeholder. There was limited analysis of advance directive implementation practices. Conclusions: There is mixed evidence related to the efficacy of advance directives in aligning care with patient wishes and improving the quality of care relative to cost. Investigation of implementation practices may provide insight into factors determining these varied outcomes. This review highlights opportunities to improve upon methodology for studying advance directives and applying them effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信