东莨菪碱对记忆和注意力的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Cerena Miravalles, Dara M Cannon, Brian Hallahan
{"title":"东莨菪碱对记忆和注意力的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Cerena Miravalles, Dara M Cannon, Brian Hallahan","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scopolamine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist and is widely utilized as a \"memory-loss model.\" However, its impact across different memory and attention tasks and using different modes of administration has yet to be clearly evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effect of scopolamine, across all routes of administration and across different dosages, on memory and attention performance in healthy humans (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024531634).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched (on 20 April 2024) for studies that utilized scopolamine and assessed memory and/or attention. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted across a range of memory and attention tasks using \"Comprehensive Meta-Analysis,\" Version 3, to evaluate differential pharmacological effects on cognitive tasks between the scopolamine and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Scopolamine negatively impaired performance on all memory tasks (immediate memory, delayed recall, digit span, Buschke selective reminding task, and recognition memory) and led to slower reaction times for three of the five attention tasks examined (choice reaction time, simple reaction time, and rapid visual information processing) compared to placebo. Scopolamine's negative effect on memory and attention was greater with injectable (e.g., intramuscular, intravenous, and subcutaneous) compared to non-injectable routes of administration (e.g., intranasal, oral, and transdermal).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the use of scopolamine as a \"memory-loss model,\" particularly when given by an injectable route of administration. Future clinical trials should evaluate the bioavailability of scopolamine across different routes of administration to ensure therapeutic benefits outweigh any potential adverse cognitive effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e50"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of scopolamine on memory and attention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cerena Miravalles, Dara M Cannon, Brian Hallahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scopolamine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist and is widely utilized as a \\\"memory-loss model.\\\" However, its impact across different memory and attention tasks and using different modes of administration has yet to be clearly evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effect of scopolamine, across all routes of administration and across different dosages, on memory and attention performance in healthy humans (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024531634).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched (on 20 April 2024) for studies that utilized scopolamine and assessed memory and/or attention. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted across a range of memory and attention tasks using \\\"Comprehensive Meta-Analysis,\\\" Version 3, to evaluate differential pharmacological effects on cognitive tasks between the scopolamine and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Scopolamine negatively impaired performance on all memory tasks (immediate memory, delayed recall, digit span, Buschke selective reminding task, and recognition memory) and led to slower reaction times for three of the five attention tasks examined (choice reaction time, simple reaction time, and rapid visual information processing) compared to placebo. Scopolamine's negative effect on memory and attention was greater with injectable (e.g., intramuscular, intravenous, and subcutaneous) compared to non-injectable routes of administration (e.g., intranasal, oral, and transdermal).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the use of scopolamine as a \\\"memory-loss model,\\\" particularly when given by an injectable route of administration. Future clinical trials should evaluate the bioavailability of scopolamine across different routes of administration to ensure therapeutic benefits outweigh any potential adverse cognitive effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2446\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:东莨菪碱是一种毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂,被广泛用作“记忆丧失模型”。然而,它对不同的记忆和注意力任务以及使用不同的管理模式的影响尚未得到明确的评估。本系统综述和荟萃分析调查了东莨菪碱在所有给药途径和不同剂量下对健康人记忆和注意力表现的影响。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们检索了(2024年4月20日)使用东莨菪碱并评估记忆和/或注意力的研究。随机效应荟萃分析在一系列记忆和注意力任务中进行,使用“综合荟萃分析”版本3,以评估东莨菪碱组和安慰剂组对认知任务的不同药理作用。结果:46项研究符合纳入和排除标准。与安慰剂相比,东莨菪碱对所有记忆任务(即时记忆、延迟回忆、数字广度、布施克选择性提醒任务和识别记忆)的表现都有负面影响,并导致5个注意力任务(选择反应时间、简单反应时间和快速视觉信息处理)中的3个反应时间变慢。与非注射给药途径(如鼻内、口服和透皮)相比,注射方式(如肌肉注射、静脉注射和皮下注射)东莨菪碱对记忆和注意力的负面影响更大。结论:这项研究支持东莨菪碱作为“记忆丧失模型”的使用,特别是通过注射给药的方式。未来的临床试验应评估东莨菪碱在不同给药途径中的生物利用度,以确保治疗益处超过任何潜在的不良认知影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of scopolamine on memory and attention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Scopolamine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist and is widely utilized as a "memory-loss model." However, its impact across different memory and attention tasks and using different modes of administration has yet to be clearly evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effect of scopolamine, across all routes of administration and across different dosages, on memory and attention performance in healthy humans (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024531634).

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched (on 20 April 2024) for studies that utilized scopolamine and assessed memory and/or attention. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted across a range of memory and attention tasks using "Comprehensive Meta-Analysis," Version 3, to evaluate differential pharmacological effects on cognitive tasks between the scopolamine and placebo groups.

Results: Forty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Scopolamine negatively impaired performance on all memory tasks (immediate memory, delayed recall, digit span, Buschke selective reminding task, and recognition memory) and led to slower reaction times for three of the five attention tasks examined (choice reaction time, simple reaction time, and rapid visual information processing) compared to placebo. Scopolamine's negative effect on memory and attention was greater with injectable (e.g., intramuscular, intravenous, and subcutaneous) compared to non-injectable routes of administration (e.g., intranasal, oral, and transdermal).

Conclusion: This study supports the use of scopolamine as a "memory-loss model," particularly when given by an injectable route of administration. Future clinical trials should evaluate the bioavailability of scopolamine across different routes of administration to ensure therapeutic benefits outweigh any potential adverse cognitive effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信