{"title":"Differences in the Psychopharmacological Trajectories of School-Age Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with and without Intellectual Disability.","authors":"Francisca Bastos Maia, Vânia Martins Miranda","doi":"10.20344/amp.20712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects 5% - 7% of school-aged children, while intellectual disability (IDD) affects approximately 1% of the general population. Diagnosing and treating ADHD in individuals with IDD is challenging, not only due to communication difficulties but also because of psychiatric comorbidities that may be present. These factors can result in underdiagnosis of ADHD and increased prescribing of other psychotropic medications. The aim of this study was to determine differences in psychopharmacological treatment (number of prescribed psychostimulants, inefficacy, adverse effects) and in the number of comorbidities and other prescribed psychotropic drugs between patients with ADHD, with and without ID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the study, 845 children were included, divided into two groups: 574 with ADHD without ID and 271 with ADHD with ID. Microsoft® Excel® was used to calculate the Student's t-test, and statistical significance was assumed using the standard p-value of < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in the average number of psychostimulants prescribed between groups (p = 0.57). Among those with ADHD without ID, 52.4% switched psychostimulants, while in the group with ADHD and ID, this change occurred in 56.1%. Statistically significant differences were found in the average number of other psychotropic medications prescribed per patient (p < 0.05) and in the number of antipsychotics prescribed (p < 0.05). Although our study showed more antipsychotic prescriptions for patients with ID compared to those without ID, some studies report similar use of antipsychotics between these groups. Additionally, the group with ID presented significantly more comorbidities than the group without ID (p < 0.05). These findings are aligned with the literature, which indicates a higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in samples of patients with ID compared to those without ID (50% vs 18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with ID are diagnosed with more psychiatric comorbidities and are prescribed more psychotropic drugs. Additionally, more adverse effects and inefficacy with psychostimulants in ID populations require careful monitoring after initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7059,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica portuguesa","volume":"38 4","pages":"228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)影响着 5%-7%的学龄儿童,而智力障碍(IDD)影响着大约 1%的普通人群。诊断和治疗智障人士的多动症是一项具有挑战性的工作,这不仅是因为沟通困难,还因为他们可能合并有精神疾病。这些因素可能导致多动症诊断不足和其他精神药物处方的增加。本研究旨在确定有无智障的多动症患者在精神药物治疗(处方精神刺激剂的数量、无效性、不良反应)以及合并症和其他处方精神药物数量方面的差异:研究共纳入 845 名儿童,分为两组:574 名患有多动症但无智障的儿童和 271 名患有多动症但有智障的儿童。研究使用 Microsoft® Excel® 进行学生 t 检验,以 P 值小于 0.05 为标准进行统计显著性假设:结果:在处方精神刺激剂的平均数量上,各组之间没有发现明显差异(p = 0.57)。在不患有智障的多动症患者中,52.4%的人更换了精神刺激药物,而在患有多动症和智障的群体中,56.1%的人更换了精神刺激药物。每位患者处方的其他精神药物的平均数量(P<0.05)和处方的抗精神病药物的数量(P<0.05)在统计学上存在显著差异。尽管我们的研究显示,与非智障患者相比,智障患者的抗精神病药物处方量更多,但一些研究报告显示,这两组患者的抗精神病药物使用情况相似。此外,智障组患者的合并症明显多于非智障组患者(P < 0.05)。这些研究结果与文献一致,文献显示,与非智障患者相比,智障患者样本中精神疾病合并症的发生率更高(50% vs 18%):结论:被诊断出患有更多精神并发症的智障人士会被处方更多的精神药物。此外,精神刺激剂在智障人群中的不良反应和无效情况较多,因此在开始使用后需要仔细监测。
Differences in the Psychopharmacological Trajectories of School-Age Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with and without Intellectual Disability.
Introduction: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects 5% - 7% of school-aged children, while intellectual disability (IDD) affects approximately 1% of the general population. Diagnosing and treating ADHD in individuals with IDD is challenging, not only due to communication difficulties but also because of psychiatric comorbidities that may be present. These factors can result in underdiagnosis of ADHD and increased prescribing of other psychotropic medications. The aim of this study was to determine differences in psychopharmacological treatment (number of prescribed psychostimulants, inefficacy, adverse effects) and in the number of comorbidities and other prescribed psychotropic drugs between patients with ADHD, with and without ID.
Methods: In the study, 845 children were included, divided into two groups: 574 with ADHD without ID and 271 with ADHD with ID. Microsoft® Excel® was used to calculate the Student's t-test, and statistical significance was assumed using the standard p-value of < 0.05.
Results: No significant differences were found in the average number of psychostimulants prescribed between groups (p = 0.57). Among those with ADHD without ID, 52.4% switched psychostimulants, while in the group with ADHD and ID, this change occurred in 56.1%. Statistically significant differences were found in the average number of other psychotropic medications prescribed per patient (p < 0.05) and in the number of antipsychotics prescribed (p < 0.05). Although our study showed more antipsychotic prescriptions for patients with ID compared to those without ID, some studies report similar use of antipsychotics between these groups. Additionally, the group with ID presented significantly more comorbidities than the group without ID (p < 0.05). These findings are aligned with the literature, which indicates a higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in samples of patients with ID compared to those without ID (50% vs 18%).
Conclusion: Individuals with ID are diagnosed with more psychiatric comorbidities and are prescribed more psychotropic drugs. Additionally, more adverse effects and inefficacy with psychostimulants in ID populations require careful monitoring after initiation.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Acta Médica Portuguesa is to publish original research and review articles in biomedical areas of the
highest standard, covering several domains of medical
knowledge, with the purpose to help doctors improve medical care.
In order to accomplish these aims, Acta Médica Portuguesa publishes original articles, review articles, case reports and editorials, among others, with a focus on clinical,
scientific, social, political and economic factors affecting
health. Acta Médica Portuguesa will be happy to consider
manuscripts for publication from authors anywhere in the
world.