基本身体意识疗法对慢性腰痛患者的身体意识、疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响:一项试点研究。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Kaniye Unes, Gozde Yagci, Gulnihal Metin, Oya Ozdemir
{"title":"基本身体意识疗法对慢性腰痛患者的身体意识、疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响:一项试点研究。","authors":"Kaniye Unes, Gozde Yagci, Gulnihal Metin, Oya Ozdemir","doi":"10.1177/00315125251332435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimWhile there are several conservative therapy methods used for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there remains a need for more holistic approaches. This pilot study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) in patients with CLBP.MethodsTwenty-eight patients with CLBP, 14 in the Conventional Therapy (CT) group and 14 in the BBAT group, were included in our study. Both groups received CT for 6 weeks, which included electrotherapy, hot pack, and general exercises. The BBAT group received BBAT in addition to CT. The Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was used to assess pain, the SF-12 was used to evaluate quality of life and the Awareness Body Chart (ABC), Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) and Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaires (FreBAQ) were used to evaluate body awareness. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Physical Impairment Index were used to assess disability.ResultsGreater improvements were observed in BBAT group compared to CT group in the emotional index and total scores of the SF-MPQ, as well as the SF-12 mental health scores (<i>p</i> < .05). BBAT produced greater improvements in body awareness values for the cervical-lumbar region, chest/abdomen, back, shoulder, thigh/hip, lower leg, and overall score of the ABC compared to CT (<i>p</i> < .05). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the FreBAQ and BAQ scores (<i>p</i> > .05).ConclusionIn patients with CLBP, the addition of BBAT to CT resulted in positive outcomes such as increased body awareness, decreased pain, and improved mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251332435"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Basic Body Awareness Therapy on Body Awareness, Pain, Disability and Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kaniye Unes, Gozde Yagci, Gulnihal Metin, Oya Ozdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00315125251332435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AimWhile there are several conservative therapy methods used for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there remains a need for more holistic approaches. This pilot study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) in patients with CLBP.MethodsTwenty-eight patients with CLBP, 14 in the Conventional Therapy (CT) group and 14 in the BBAT group, were included in our study. Both groups received CT for 6 weeks, which included electrotherapy, hot pack, and general exercises. The BBAT group received BBAT in addition to CT. The Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was used to assess pain, the SF-12 was used to evaluate quality of life and the Awareness Body Chart (ABC), Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) and Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaires (FreBAQ) were used to evaluate body awareness. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Physical Impairment Index were used to assess disability.ResultsGreater improvements were observed in BBAT group compared to CT group in the emotional index and total scores of the SF-MPQ, as well as the SF-12 mental health scores (<i>p</i> < .05). BBAT produced greater improvements in body awareness values for the cervical-lumbar region, chest/abdomen, back, shoulder, thigh/hip, lower leg, and overall score of the ABC compared to CT (<i>p</i> < .05). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the FreBAQ and BAQ scores (<i>p</i> > .05).ConclusionIn patients with CLBP, the addition of BBAT to CT resulted in positive outcomes such as increased body awareness, decreased pain, and improved mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"315125251332435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251332435\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251332435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有几种保守治疗方法用于慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者,但仍需要更全面的治疗方法。本初步研究旨在评估基础身体意识疗法(BBAT)在CLBP患者中的有效性。方法选取28例CLBP患者,其中常规治疗组14例,BBAT治疗组14例。两组均接受CT治疗,为期6周,包括电疗、热敷和一般运动。BBAT组在CT的基础上进行BBAT治疗。采用短格式McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)评估疼痛,SF-12评估生活质量,采用意识身体量表(ABC)、身体意识问卷(BAQ)和Fremantle背部意识问卷(FreBAQ)评估身体意识。采用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和肢体损伤指数(Physical Impairment Index)评估残疾程度。结果BBAT组患者情绪指数、SF-MPQ总分、SF-12心理健康评分均较CT组改善显著(p < 0.05)。与CT相比,BBAT在颈腰椎区、胸/腹部、背部、肩部、大腿/臀部、小腿的身体意识值和ABC总分方面有更大的改善(p < 0.05)。然而,FreBAQ和BAQ评分在两组间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论在CLBP患者中,在CT上添加BBAT可产生积极的结果,如增强身体意识、减轻疼痛和改善心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Basic Body Awareness Therapy on Body Awareness, Pain, Disability and Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.

AimWhile there are several conservative therapy methods used for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there remains a need for more holistic approaches. This pilot study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) in patients with CLBP.MethodsTwenty-eight patients with CLBP, 14 in the Conventional Therapy (CT) group and 14 in the BBAT group, were included in our study. Both groups received CT for 6 weeks, which included electrotherapy, hot pack, and general exercises. The BBAT group received BBAT in addition to CT. The Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was used to assess pain, the SF-12 was used to evaluate quality of life and the Awareness Body Chart (ABC), Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) and Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaires (FreBAQ) were used to evaluate body awareness. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Physical Impairment Index were used to assess disability.ResultsGreater improvements were observed in BBAT group compared to CT group in the emotional index and total scores of the SF-MPQ, as well as the SF-12 mental health scores (p < .05). BBAT produced greater improvements in body awareness values for the cervical-lumbar region, chest/abdomen, back, shoulder, thigh/hip, lower leg, and overall score of the ABC compared to CT (p < .05). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the FreBAQ and BAQ scores (p > .05).ConclusionIn patients with CLBP, the addition of BBAT to CT resulted in positive outcomes such as increased body awareness, decreased pain, and improved mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信