空间整合还是孤立?利用手机数据捕捉赫尔辛基各个街区的日常生活节奏

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Kerli Müürisepp, Matti Manninen, Venla Bernelius, Tiit Tammaru, Tuuli Toivonen, Olle Järv
{"title":"空间整合还是孤立?利用手机数据捕捉赫尔辛基各个街区的日常生活节奏","authors":"Kerli Müürisepp,&nbsp;Matti Manninen,&nbsp;Venla Bernelius,&nbsp;Tiit Tammaru,&nbsp;Tuuli Toivonen,&nbsp;Olle Järv","doi":"10.1002/psp.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>People's exposure to various social and spatial contexts over time leads to patterns of spatial integration and segregation. While the study of spatial integration has predominantly focused on the location and context of residential neighbourhoods, the emerging activity space approach to segregation argues that it is important to consider people's actual activity locations and mobility. This study builds on both approaches, to provide insights into residential communities' spatial integration over their daily use of urban space. By focussing on the Nordic welfare state context, with its low socioeconomic disparities and deep-rooted antisegregation policies in Finland, we paid specific attention to the extent to which residents of affluent, mixed, and disadvantaged neighbourhoods exhibit spatial integration over their activity spaces. By combining mobile phone and population register data from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, we were able to show residential communities' use of urban space hour-by-hour on a workday and a weekend day, and its time-sensitive associations with their neighbourhood-level socioeconomic characteristics. We found that residents of disadvantaged neighbourhoods are spatially more isolated than residents of affluent and mixed neighbourhoods. Specifically, they spend more time in their own neighbourhood, have more concentrated use of urban space outside their home neighbourhood, and are less exposed to the socially diverse city centre. However, the intergroup differences are more significant at weekends, which highlights the importance of time-sensitive segregation analysis. Finally, we argue for the need for neighbourhood-centred integration policies to consider residents' use of urban space both within and beyond their home neighbourhood.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial Integration or Isolation? Capturing the Rhythms of Daily Lives Across Neighbourhoods in Helsinki Using Mobile Phone Data\",\"authors\":\"Kerli Müürisepp,&nbsp;Matti Manninen,&nbsp;Venla Bernelius,&nbsp;Tiit Tammaru,&nbsp;Tuuli Toivonen,&nbsp;Olle Järv\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>People's exposure to various social and spatial contexts over time leads to patterns of spatial integration and segregation. While the study of spatial integration has predominantly focused on the location and context of residential neighbourhoods, the emerging activity space approach to segregation argues that it is important to consider people's actual activity locations and mobility. This study builds on both approaches, to provide insights into residential communities' spatial integration over their daily use of urban space. By focussing on the Nordic welfare state context, with its low socioeconomic disparities and deep-rooted antisegregation policies in Finland, we paid specific attention to the extent to which residents of affluent, mixed, and disadvantaged neighbourhoods exhibit spatial integration over their activity spaces. By combining mobile phone and population register data from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, we were able to show residential communities' use of urban space hour-by-hour on a workday and a weekend day, and its time-sensitive associations with their neighbourhood-level socioeconomic characteristics. We found that residents of disadvantaged neighbourhoods are spatially more isolated than residents of affluent and mixed neighbourhoods. Specifically, they spend more time in their own neighbourhood, have more concentrated use of urban space outside their home neighbourhood, and are less exposed to the socially diverse city centre. However, the intergroup differences are more significant at weekends, which highlights the importance of time-sensitive segregation analysis. Finally, we argue for the need for neighbourhood-centred integration policies to consider residents' use of urban space both within and beyond their home neighbourhood.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着时间的推移,人们对各种社会和空间环境的暴露导致了空间整合和隔离的模式。虽然空间整合的研究主要集中在居民区的位置和环境上,但新兴的活动空间隔离方法认为,考虑人们的实际活动地点和流动性是很重要的。本研究建立在这两种方法的基础上,为住宅社区在城市空间的日常使用中提供空间整合的见解。通过关注北欧福利国家背景下芬兰低社会经济差异和根深蒂固的反隔离政策,我们特别关注富裕、混合和弱势社区的居民在其活动空间中表现出的空间整合程度。通过结合赫尔辛基都市区的移动电话和人口登记数据,我们能够显示住宅社区在工作日和周末每小时对城市空间的使用情况,以及其与社区社会经济特征的时间敏感性关联。我们发现弱势社区的居民在空间上比富裕和混合社区的居民更孤立。具体来说,他们花更多的时间在自己的社区,更多地集中使用家园社区以外的城市空间,较少接触社会多样化的城市中心。然而,组间差异在周末更为显著,这凸显了时间敏感隔离分析的重要性。最后,我们认为有必要制定以社区为中心的整合政策,以考虑居民在其家庭社区内外对城市空间的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial Integration or Isolation? Capturing the Rhythms of Daily Lives Across Neighbourhoods in Helsinki Using Mobile Phone Data

People's exposure to various social and spatial contexts over time leads to patterns of spatial integration and segregation. While the study of spatial integration has predominantly focused on the location and context of residential neighbourhoods, the emerging activity space approach to segregation argues that it is important to consider people's actual activity locations and mobility. This study builds on both approaches, to provide insights into residential communities' spatial integration over their daily use of urban space. By focussing on the Nordic welfare state context, with its low socioeconomic disparities and deep-rooted antisegregation policies in Finland, we paid specific attention to the extent to which residents of affluent, mixed, and disadvantaged neighbourhoods exhibit spatial integration over their activity spaces. By combining mobile phone and population register data from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, we were able to show residential communities' use of urban space hour-by-hour on a workday and a weekend day, and its time-sensitive associations with their neighbourhood-level socioeconomic characteristics. We found that residents of disadvantaged neighbourhoods are spatially more isolated than residents of affluent and mixed neighbourhoods. Specifically, they spend more time in their own neighbourhood, have more concentrated use of urban space outside their home neighbourhood, and are less exposed to the socially diverse city centre. However, the intergroup differences are more significant at weekends, which highlights the importance of time-sensitive segregation analysis. Finally, we argue for the need for neighbourhood-centred integration policies to consider residents' use of urban space both within and beyond their home neighbourhood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信