神经阻滞治疗急性胸部带状疱疹的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-03-01
Chiao-Ming Chuang, Chung-Ren Lin, Yu-Lien Hsieh
{"title":"神经阻滞治疗急性胸部带状疱疹的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chiao-Ming Chuang, Chung-Ren Lin, Yu-Lien Hsieh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute zoster-related pain affects more than 90% of patients with acute herpes zoster. While nerve blocks with local anesthetics and steroids are commonly used to manage acute postoperative and chronic pain, their efficacy and safety in treating acute herpes zoster remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various nerve blocks for managing acute herpes zoster.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies of patients with acute herpes zoster who received nerve blocks. Study quality was assessed using risk-of-bias tools for randomized and nonrandomized studies. The primary outcome was analgesic efficacy; secondary outcomes included postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) incidences, analgesic consumption, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (9 RCTs, n = 815; 4 observational studies, n = 253) were included. Nerve blocks administered were  paravertebral blocks (PVB), erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, epidural blocks, and intercostal nerve blocks. The meta-analysis, which included 6 RCTs, indicated that at 4 weeks postprocedure, nerve blocks significantly reduced Visual Analog Scale pain scores. The blocks also reduced the need for acetaminophen and pregabalin compared with the control group. However, no differences in Visual Analog Scale pain scores were observed at 12 weeks. Both PVB and ESP blocks significantly decreased the PHN incidences at 3 and 6 months postprocedure. Five studies demonstrated that ultrasound-guided ESP blocks significantly reduced pain severity, duration, and the incidence of PHN without notable adverse events. Eight studies found PVBs to be effective in reducing pain scores and PHN incidences, though adverse events such as dizziness, drowsiness, and pain at the injection site were reported. Four observational studies comparing epidural or intercostal nerve blocks with other techniques provided weak evidence for their use.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our study's limitations include its small sample size with only 6 RCTs, significant heterogeneity in study designs, and variations in the interventions. Subjectivity in measuring pain and the lack of blinding introduces potential bias. Additionally, limited evidence on intercostal and epidural blocks for acute herpes zoster highlights the need for more high-quality RCTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, nerve blocks with local anesthetics and steroids provide effective analgesia, reduce analgesic consumption, and lower PHN incidences in patients with acute thoracic herpes zoster. We recommend an ESP block due to its safety profile, while a PVB may offer similar analgesic benefits but with a higher risk. Further high-quality studies are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 2","pages":"83-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nerve Block Efficacy and Safety for Acute Thoracic Herpes Zoster: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chiao-Ming Chuang, Chung-Ren Lin, Yu-Lien Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute zoster-related pain affects more than 90% of patients with acute herpes zoster. While nerve blocks with local anesthetics and steroids are commonly used to manage acute postoperative and chronic pain, their efficacy and safety in treating acute herpes zoster remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various nerve blocks for managing acute herpes zoster.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies of patients with acute herpes zoster who received nerve blocks. Study quality was assessed using risk-of-bias tools for randomized and nonrandomized studies. The primary outcome was analgesic efficacy; secondary outcomes included postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) incidences, analgesic consumption, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (9 RCTs, n = 815; 4 observational studies, n = 253) were included. Nerve blocks administered were  paravertebral blocks (PVB), erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, epidural blocks, and intercostal nerve blocks. The meta-analysis, which included 6 RCTs, indicated that at 4 weeks postprocedure, nerve blocks significantly reduced Visual Analog Scale pain scores. The blocks also reduced the need for acetaminophen and pregabalin compared with the control group. However, no differences in Visual Analog Scale pain scores were observed at 12 weeks. Both PVB and ESP blocks significantly decreased the PHN incidences at 3 and 6 months postprocedure. Five studies demonstrated that ultrasound-guided ESP blocks significantly reduced pain severity, duration, and the incidence of PHN without notable adverse events. Eight studies found PVBs to be effective in reducing pain scores and PHN incidences, though adverse events such as dizziness, drowsiness, and pain at the injection site were reported. Four observational studies comparing epidural or intercostal nerve blocks with other techniques provided weak evidence for their use.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our study's limitations include its small sample size with only 6 RCTs, significant heterogeneity in study designs, and variations in the interventions. Subjectivity in measuring pain and the lack of blinding introduces potential bias. Additionally, limited evidence on intercostal and epidural blocks for acute herpes zoster highlights the need for more high-quality RCTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, nerve blocks with local anesthetics and steroids provide effective analgesia, reduce analgesic consumption, and lower PHN incidences in patients with acute thoracic herpes zoster. We recommend an ESP block due to its safety profile, while a PVB may offer similar analgesic benefits but with a higher risk. Further high-quality studies are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"83-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性带状疱疹相关疼痛影响90%以上的急性带状疱疹患者。虽然局部麻醉剂和类固醇神经阻滞通常用于治疗急性术后和慢性疼痛,但其治疗急性带状疱疹的有效性和安全性仍未得到充分探讨。目的:我们的系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在评估各种神经阻滞治疗急性带状疱疹的有效性和安全性。研究设计:我们对随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,这些研究遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单。方法:综合检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验登记系统,以确定急性带状疱疹患者接受神经阻滞的研究。使用随机和非随机研究的偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。主要观察指标为镇痛效果;次要结局包括带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)发生率、镇痛药用量和不良事件。结果:13项研究(9项rct, n = 815;纳入4项观察性研究(n = 253)。神经阻滞包括椎旁阻滞(PVB)、竖脊平面阻滞(ESP)、硬膜外阻滞和肋间神经阻滞。包括6项随机对照试验的荟萃分析表明,在手术后4周,神经阻滞显著降低了视觉模拟量表疼痛评分。与对照组相比,阻滞也减少了对乙酰氨基酚和普瑞巴林的需求。然而,视觉模拟量表疼痛评分在12周时没有观察到差异。在术后3个月和6个月,PVB和ESP阻滞均可显著降低PHN的发生率。五项研究表明,超声引导下的ESP阻滞可显著降低疼痛严重程度、持续时间和PHN发生率,且无明显不良事件。八项研究发现pvb在降低疼痛评分和PHN发生率方面有效,尽管有不良事件如头晕、嗜睡和注射部位疼痛的报道。四项比较硬膜外或肋间神经阻滞与其他技术的观察性研究为其使用提供了微弱的证据。局限性:本研究的局限性包括样本量小,只有6个随机对照试验,研究设计存在显著异质性,干预措施存在差异。测量疼痛的主观性和缺乏盲法会引入潜在的偏差。此外,关于急性带状疱疹的肋间和硬膜外阻滞的有限证据表明需要更多高质量的随机对照试验。结论:局部麻醉剂和类固醇联合神经阻滞治疗急性胸段带状疱疹患者镇痛有效,镇痛用量减少,PHN发生率降低。由于其安全性,我们推荐使用ESP阻滞,而PVB可能提供类似的镇痛效果,但风险更高。需要进一步的高质量研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nerve Block Efficacy and Safety for Acute Thoracic Herpes Zoster: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Acute zoster-related pain affects more than 90% of patients with acute herpes zoster. While nerve blocks with local anesthetics and steroids are commonly used to manage acute postoperative and chronic pain, their efficacy and safety in treating acute herpes zoster remain underexplored.

Objectives: Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various nerve blocks for managing acute herpes zoster.

Study design: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist.

Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies of patients with acute herpes zoster who received nerve blocks. Study quality was assessed using risk-of-bias tools for randomized and nonrandomized studies. The primary outcome was analgesic efficacy; secondary outcomes included postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) incidences, analgesic consumption, and adverse events.

Results: Thirteen studies (9 RCTs, n = 815; 4 observational studies, n = 253) were included. Nerve blocks administered were  paravertebral blocks (PVB), erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, epidural blocks, and intercostal nerve blocks. The meta-analysis, which included 6 RCTs, indicated that at 4 weeks postprocedure, nerve blocks significantly reduced Visual Analog Scale pain scores. The blocks also reduced the need for acetaminophen and pregabalin compared with the control group. However, no differences in Visual Analog Scale pain scores were observed at 12 weeks. Both PVB and ESP blocks significantly decreased the PHN incidences at 3 and 6 months postprocedure. Five studies demonstrated that ultrasound-guided ESP blocks significantly reduced pain severity, duration, and the incidence of PHN without notable adverse events. Eight studies found PVBs to be effective in reducing pain scores and PHN incidences, though adverse events such as dizziness, drowsiness, and pain at the injection site were reported. Four observational studies comparing epidural or intercostal nerve blocks with other techniques provided weak evidence for their use.

Limitations: Our study's limitations include its small sample size with only 6 RCTs, significant heterogeneity in study designs, and variations in the interventions. Subjectivity in measuring pain and the lack of blinding introduces potential bias. Additionally, limited evidence on intercostal and epidural blocks for acute herpes zoster highlights the need for more high-quality RCTs.

Conclusion: In conclusion, nerve blocks with local anesthetics and steroids provide effective analgesia, reduce analgesic consumption, and lower PHN incidences in patients with acute thoracic herpes zoster. We recommend an ESP block due to its safety profile, while a PVB may offer similar analgesic benefits but with a higher risk. Further high-quality studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信