生物医学植入材料的合成与设计优化。

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bioimpacts Pub Date : 2024-06-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34172/bi.30010
Nilesh Tipan, Ajay Pandey, Pushyamitra Mishra
{"title":"生物医学植入材料的合成与设计优化。","authors":"Nilesh Tipan, Ajay Pandey, Pushyamitra Mishra","doi":"10.34172/bi.30010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the modern era, the use of biomaterials in orthopaedics has revolutionised the healthcare sector. Traditionally, some non-biodegradable materials such as titanium and stainless steel are used as biomaterials. However, issues such as toxicity, poor tissue adhesion, and stress-shielding effect can occur with non-biodegradable materials for bone fracture fixation. Several biodegradable materials have been developed to resolve these issues but have not yet been appropriately industrialized for implant applications. These substances can be classified into metals, ceramics, and polymers, which can be blended to create composites that enhance biocompatibility and biomechanical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study began by contrasting the biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among various alloys: biodegradable low entropy (BLE) alloys, biodegradable medium entropy (BME) alloys, biodegradable high entropy (BHE) alloys, and non-biodegradable medium entropy (NBME) alloys. Additionally, the design morphology of bio-implants like plates, screws, and others was inspected. Moreover, a meta-analysis was conducted to optimize the design of biomaterials, ensuring appropriate biocompatibility and degradation rate. A subsequent statistical analysis was executed to determine the optimal material concentration for bio-implant alloy creation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, in this paper, the advantages of biodegradable materials over conventional non-biodegradable materials are discussed and bibliometric analysis is done to show recent research contributions in the field of biomedical implant application. Then compared biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among BLE alloys, BME alloys, BHE alloys, NBME alloys. Furthermore, investigated the design morphology of bio-implants such as plates and screws. Also presented a meta-analysis for design optimization of biomaterials to meet suitable biocompatibility and biodegradation rates and presented a statistical analysis among them, which helps to select the appropriate material concentration for bio-implant alloy formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was observed that in biodegradable materials, tensile strength is in the pattern of NBME > BHE > BME > BLE, and the degradation rate is in the pattern of BME > NBME > BHE > BLE. This study suggests that biodegradable materials (BLE and BME) are a much better choice than non-biodegradable materials in orthopaedic applications. It was also observed that a Biodegradable locking compression plate (BLCP) can provide the necessary strength and performance. Further, the systematic meta-analysis presented herein furnishes crucial data to researchers, guiding them in enhancing the efficiency of diverse biomaterials and optimizing their designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48614,"journal":{"name":"Bioimpacts","volume":"15 ","pages":"30010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material synthesis and design optimization of biomaterials for biomedical implant applications.\",\"authors\":\"Nilesh Tipan, Ajay Pandey, Pushyamitra Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/bi.30010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the modern era, the use of biomaterials in orthopaedics has revolutionised the healthcare sector. Traditionally, some non-biodegradable materials such as titanium and stainless steel are used as biomaterials. However, issues such as toxicity, poor tissue adhesion, and stress-shielding effect can occur with non-biodegradable materials for bone fracture fixation. Several biodegradable materials have been developed to resolve these issues but have not yet been appropriately industrialized for implant applications. These substances can be classified into metals, ceramics, and polymers, which can be blended to create composites that enhance biocompatibility and biomechanical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study began by contrasting the biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among various alloys: biodegradable low entropy (BLE) alloys, biodegradable medium entropy (BME) alloys, biodegradable high entropy (BHE) alloys, and non-biodegradable medium entropy (NBME) alloys. Additionally, the design morphology of bio-implants like plates, screws, and others was inspected. Moreover, a meta-analysis was conducted to optimize the design of biomaterials, ensuring appropriate biocompatibility and degradation rate. A subsequent statistical analysis was executed to determine the optimal material concentration for bio-implant alloy creation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, in this paper, the advantages of biodegradable materials over conventional non-biodegradable materials are discussed and bibliometric analysis is done to show recent research contributions in the field of biomedical implant application. Then compared biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among BLE alloys, BME alloys, BHE alloys, NBME alloys. Furthermore, investigated the design morphology of bio-implants such as plates and screws. Also presented a meta-analysis for design optimization of biomaterials to meet suitable biocompatibility and biodegradation rates and presented a statistical analysis among them, which helps to select the appropriate material concentration for bio-implant alloy formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was observed that in biodegradable materials, tensile strength is in the pattern of NBME > BHE > BME > BLE, and the degradation rate is in the pattern of BME > NBME > BHE > BLE. This study suggests that biodegradable materials (BLE and BME) are a much better choice than non-biodegradable materials in orthopaedic applications. It was also observed that a Biodegradable locking compression plate (BLCP) can provide the necessary strength and performance. Further, the systematic meta-analysis presented herein furnishes crucial data to researchers, guiding them in enhancing the efficiency of diverse biomaterials and optimizing their designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioimpacts\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"30010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioimpacts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/bi.30010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioimpacts","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/bi.30010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:在现代,生物材料在骨科的使用已经彻底改变了医疗保健部门。传统上,一些不可生物降解的材料如钛和不锈钢被用作生物材料。然而,非生物降解材料用于骨折固定会出现毒性、组织粘附性差、应力屏蔽效应等问题。为了解决这些问题,已经开发了几种生物可降解材料,但尚未适当地工业化用于植入物的应用。这些物质可以分为金属、陶瓷和聚合物,它们可以混合成增强生物相容性和生物力学特性的复合材料。方法:通过对比生物可降解低熵(BLE)合金、生物可降解介质熵(BME)合金、生物可降解高熵(BHE)合金和非生物可降解介质熵(NBME)合金的生物相容性和力学相容性进行研究。此外,还检查了生物植入物(如板、螺钉等)的设计形态。此外,我们还进行了荟萃分析,以优化生物材料的设计,确保适当的生物相容性和降解率。随后进行了统计分析,以确定生物植入物合金制造的最佳材料浓度。结果:本文首先讨论了生物可降解材料相对于传统非生物可降解材料的优势,并通过文献计量分析显示了近年来在生物医学植入物应用领域的研究贡献。然后比较了BLE合金、BME合金、BHE合金、NBME合金的生物相容性和力学相容性。此外,研究了生物植入物如板和螺钉的设计形态。同时对生物材料的优化设计进行了meta分析,以满足合适的生物相容性和生物降解率,并对其进行了统计分析,以选择合适的材料浓度来形成生物植入体合金。结论:在生物降解材料中,拉伸强度呈NBME > BHE > BME > BLE模式,降解速率呈BME > NBME > BHE > BLE模式。本研究表明,生物降解材料(BLE和BME)在骨科应用中比非生物降解材料要好得多。还观察到生物可降解锁定压缩板(BLCP)可以提供必要的强度和性能。此外,本文提出的系统荟萃分析为研究人员提供了重要的数据,指导他们提高各种生物材料的效率和优化其设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Material synthesis and design optimization of biomaterials for biomedical implant applications.

Introduction: In the modern era, the use of biomaterials in orthopaedics has revolutionised the healthcare sector. Traditionally, some non-biodegradable materials such as titanium and stainless steel are used as biomaterials. However, issues such as toxicity, poor tissue adhesion, and stress-shielding effect can occur with non-biodegradable materials for bone fracture fixation. Several biodegradable materials have been developed to resolve these issues but have not yet been appropriately industrialized for implant applications. These substances can be classified into metals, ceramics, and polymers, which can be blended to create composites that enhance biocompatibility and biomechanical characteristics.

Methods: This study began by contrasting the biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among various alloys: biodegradable low entropy (BLE) alloys, biodegradable medium entropy (BME) alloys, biodegradable high entropy (BHE) alloys, and non-biodegradable medium entropy (NBME) alloys. Additionally, the design morphology of bio-implants like plates, screws, and others was inspected. Moreover, a meta-analysis was conducted to optimize the design of biomaterials, ensuring appropriate biocompatibility and degradation rate. A subsequent statistical analysis was executed to determine the optimal material concentration for bio-implant alloy creation.

Results: Initially, in this paper, the advantages of biodegradable materials over conventional non-biodegradable materials are discussed and bibliometric analysis is done to show recent research contributions in the field of biomedical implant application. Then compared biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among BLE alloys, BME alloys, BHE alloys, NBME alloys. Furthermore, investigated the design morphology of bio-implants such as plates and screws. Also presented a meta-analysis for design optimization of biomaterials to meet suitable biocompatibility and biodegradation rates and presented a statistical analysis among them, which helps to select the appropriate material concentration for bio-implant alloy formation.

Conclusion: It was observed that in biodegradable materials, tensile strength is in the pattern of NBME > BHE > BME > BLE, and the degradation rate is in the pattern of BME > NBME > BHE > BLE. This study suggests that biodegradable materials (BLE and BME) are a much better choice than non-biodegradable materials in orthopaedic applications. It was also observed that a Biodegradable locking compression plate (BLCP) can provide the necessary strength and performance. Further, the systematic meta-analysis presented herein furnishes crucial data to researchers, guiding them in enhancing the efficiency of diverse biomaterials and optimizing their designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioimpacts
Bioimpacts Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
36
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: BioImpacts (BI) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary international journal, covering original research articles, reviews, commentaries, hypotheses, methodologies, and visions/reflections dealing with all aspects of biological and biomedical researches at molecular, cellular, functional and translational dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信