来自407名健康受试者的ISCEV标准全场ERG参考限值,来自电极类型和中心之间参考数据的转移和验证。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rebecca A Baker, Shaun M Leo, William I N Clowes, Isabelle Chow, Xiaofan Jiang, Anne L Georgiou, Antonio Calcagni, Christopher J Hammond, Magella M Neveu, Omar A Mahroo, Anthony G Robson
{"title":"来自407名健康受试者的ISCEV标准全场ERG参考限值,来自电极类型和中心之间参考数据的转移和验证。","authors":"Rebecca A Baker, Shaun M Leo, William I N Clowes, Isabelle Chow, Xiaofan Jiang, Anne L Georgiou, Antonio Calcagni, Christopher J Hammond, Magella M Neveu, Omar A Mahroo, Anthony G Robson","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10009-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish age-adjusted reference intervals for the ISCEV standard full-field electroretinogram (ERG) recorded with silver thread electrodes in the lower fornix, based on a combined reference sample involving recordings from reference subjects and transference of data between two centres and two types of electrode.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Silver thread lower fornix ERG reference data from two centres underwent verification for inclusion in the reference sample (n = 251). Comparison analysis was performed to determine whether gold foil reference data could be included in the silver thread reference range, directly or with adjustment. Reference subjects and patients underwent ERG testing with both silver thread and gold foil electrodes (n = 53) and skin electrodes (n = 41). A linear model, fitted to the electrode comparison data, was used to transform gold foil ERG reference data for inclusion in the reference sample (n = 156). The combined sample of 407 reference individuals was used to derive age-adjusted reference limits for the main DA 0.01, DA 3, DA 10, LA 30 Hz and LA 3 ERG components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Silver thread ERG reference data was sufficiently similar across two centres to justify combination into a single reference sample. Peak times for gold foil and silver thread ERGs were closely comparable (r<sup>2</sup> 0.75-0.98, Bland-Altman bias ≤ 1.6 ms for all ERG components), with LA 30 Hz peak time showing the highest agreement (bias: - 0.2 ms, 95% limits of agreement (LOA): - 1.1 to 0.7 ms, 'silver thread-gold foil'). There was a clinically significant amplitude difference between electrode types: silver thread ERGs were 55-65% of the amplitude of gold foil ERGs (LOA ranged from 29 to 90%) and skin ERGs were 35-38% of the amplitude of silver thread ERGs (LOA ranged from 18 to 54%). Pooled reference data formed a sufficient sample covering 8 decades, from which age-adjusted parametric and nonparametric reference limits were calculated with reference to current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ISCEV standard silver thread ERG data were consistent across the two centres, allowing transference of reference data. Reference data recorded with gold foil electrodes can be transformed for inclusion in a silver thread ERG reference range. The study highlights methods of pooling multiple sources of reference data into a larger, more robust sample, pertinent to standardization, clinical management, and multi-centre studies. These reference data could be adopted by other centres or combined with other datasets, following suitable verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ISCEV standard full-field ERG reference limits from 407 healthy subjects, derived from transference and validation of reference data between electrode types and centres.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca A Baker, Shaun M Leo, William I N Clowes, Isabelle Chow, Xiaofan Jiang, Anne L Georgiou, Antonio Calcagni, Christopher J Hammond, Magella M Neveu, Omar A Mahroo, Anthony G Robson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10633-025-10009-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish age-adjusted reference intervals for the ISCEV standard full-field electroretinogram (ERG) recorded with silver thread electrodes in the lower fornix, based on a combined reference sample involving recordings from reference subjects and transference of data between two centres and two types of electrode.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Silver thread lower fornix ERG reference data from two centres underwent verification for inclusion in the reference sample (n = 251). Comparison analysis was performed to determine whether gold foil reference data could be included in the silver thread reference range, directly or with adjustment. Reference subjects and patients underwent ERG testing with both silver thread and gold foil electrodes (n = 53) and skin electrodes (n = 41). A linear model, fitted to the electrode comparison data, was used to transform gold foil ERG reference data for inclusion in the reference sample (n = 156). The combined sample of 407 reference individuals was used to derive age-adjusted reference limits for the main DA 0.01, DA 3, DA 10, LA 30 Hz and LA 3 ERG components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Silver thread ERG reference data was sufficiently similar across two centres to justify combination into a single reference sample. Peak times for gold foil and silver thread ERGs were closely comparable (r<sup>2</sup> 0.75-0.98, Bland-Altman bias ≤ 1.6 ms for all ERG components), with LA 30 Hz peak time showing the highest agreement (bias: - 0.2 ms, 95% limits of agreement (LOA): - 1.1 to 0.7 ms, 'silver thread-gold foil'). There was a clinically significant amplitude difference between electrode types: silver thread ERGs were 55-65% of the amplitude of gold foil ERGs (LOA ranged from 29 to 90%) and skin ERGs were 35-38% of the amplitude of silver thread ERGs (LOA ranged from 18 to 54%). Pooled reference data formed a sufficient sample covering 8 decades, from which age-adjusted parametric and nonparametric reference limits were calculated with reference to current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ISCEV standard silver thread ERG data were consistent across the two centres, allowing transference of reference data. Reference data recorded with gold foil electrodes can be transformed for inclusion in a silver thread ERG reference range. The study highlights methods of pooling multiple sources of reference data into a larger, more robust sample, pertinent to standardization, clinical management, and multi-centre studies. These reference data could be adopted by other centres or combined with other datasets, following suitable verification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10009-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10009-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立ISCEV标准全视野视网膜电图(ERG)的年龄调整参考区间,该参考样本包括参考受试者的记录以及两个中心和两种电极之间的数据传输。方法:对两个中心的银线下穹窿ERG参考数据进行验证,以纳入参考样本(n = 251)。通过对比分析,确定金箔参考数据是否可以直接或调整纳入银线参考范围。对照受试者和患者分别使用银线和金箔电极(n = 53)和皮肤电极(n = 41)进行ERG测试。采用拟合电极对比数据的线性模型,对金箔ERG参考数据进行变换,纳入参考样品(n = 156)。利用407个参考个体的组合样本,得到了主要的da0.01、da3、da10、la30 Hz和la3 ERG分量的年龄调整参考值。结果:两个中心的银线ERG参考数据足够相似,可以证明合并为单一参考样本是合理的。金箔和银线ERG的峰值时间非常接近(r2 0.75-0.98,所有ERG成分的Bland-Altman偏差≤1.6 ms), LA 30 Hz峰值时间显示出最高的一致性(偏差:- 0.2 ms, 95%一致性限制(LOA): - 1.1至0.7 ms,“银线-金箔”)。不同电极类型之间的振幅差异具有临床意义:银线erg振幅为金箔erg振幅的55-65% (LOA范围为29 - 90%),皮肤erg振幅为银线erg振幅的35-38% (LOA范围为18 - 54%)。汇集的参考数据形成了覆盖80年的足够样本,从中参考现行指南计算年龄调整的参数和非参数参考限值。结论:ISCEV标准银线ERG数据在两个中心是一致的,可以转移参考数据。用金箔电极记录的参考数据可以转换为包含在银线ERG参考范围内。该研究强调了将多个来源的参考数据汇集到一个更大、更健壮的样本中,与标准化、临床管理和多中心研究相关的方法。这些参考数据可由其他中心采用,或在适当核实后与其他数据集结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ISCEV standard full-field ERG reference limits from 407 healthy subjects, derived from transference and validation of reference data between electrode types and centres.

Purpose: To establish age-adjusted reference intervals for the ISCEV standard full-field electroretinogram (ERG) recorded with silver thread electrodes in the lower fornix, based on a combined reference sample involving recordings from reference subjects and transference of data between two centres and two types of electrode.

Methods: Silver thread lower fornix ERG reference data from two centres underwent verification for inclusion in the reference sample (n = 251). Comparison analysis was performed to determine whether gold foil reference data could be included in the silver thread reference range, directly or with adjustment. Reference subjects and patients underwent ERG testing with both silver thread and gold foil electrodes (n = 53) and skin electrodes (n = 41). A linear model, fitted to the electrode comparison data, was used to transform gold foil ERG reference data for inclusion in the reference sample (n = 156). The combined sample of 407 reference individuals was used to derive age-adjusted reference limits for the main DA 0.01, DA 3, DA 10, LA 30 Hz and LA 3 ERG components.

Results: Silver thread ERG reference data was sufficiently similar across two centres to justify combination into a single reference sample. Peak times for gold foil and silver thread ERGs were closely comparable (r2 0.75-0.98, Bland-Altman bias ≤ 1.6 ms for all ERG components), with LA 30 Hz peak time showing the highest agreement (bias: - 0.2 ms, 95% limits of agreement (LOA): - 1.1 to 0.7 ms, 'silver thread-gold foil'). There was a clinically significant amplitude difference between electrode types: silver thread ERGs were 55-65% of the amplitude of gold foil ERGs (LOA ranged from 29 to 90%) and skin ERGs were 35-38% of the amplitude of silver thread ERGs (LOA ranged from 18 to 54%). Pooled reference data formed a sufficient sample covering 8 decades, from which age-adjusted parametric and nonparametric reference limits were calculated with reference to current guidelines.

Conclusions: ISCEV standard silver thread ERG data were consistent across the two centres, allowing transference of reference data. Reference data recorded with gold foil electrodes can be transformed for inclusion in a silver thread ERG reference range. The study highlights methods of pooling multiple sources of reference data into a larger, more robust sample, pertinent to standardization, clinical management, and multi-centre studies. These reference data could be adopted by other centres or combined with other datasets, following suitable verification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Documenta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Documenta Ophthalmologica is an official publication of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The purpose of the journal is to promote the understanding and application of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Documenta Ophthalmologica will publish reviews, research articles, technical notes, brief reports and case studies which inform the readers about basic and clinical sciences related to visual electrodiagnosis and means to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients using visual electrophysiology. Studies may involve animals or humans. In either case appropriate care must be taken to follow the Declaration of Helsinki for human subject or appropriate humane standards of animal care (e.g., the ARVO standards on Animal Care and Use).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信