捷径与伦理之间:人工智能在印尼博士生学术写作中的应用

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hardiyanti Pratiwi,  Suherman,  Hasruddin, Muhammad Ridha
{"title":"捷径与伦理之间:人工智能在印尼博士生学术写作中的应用","authors":"Hardiyanti Pratiwi,&nbsp; Suherman,&nbsp; Hasruddin,&nbsp;Muhammad Ridha","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in academic writing, leveraging advanced algorithms and natural language processing to significantly improve efficiency, quality and productivity. This study investigates the use of AI tools among Indonesian doctoral students, with a particular focus on ethical standards and their impact on critical thinking. Adopting a phenomenological approach, the research involved 81 participants who provided data through open-ended questionnaires, which were analysed thematically. The findings reveal that AI tools—such as ChatGPT, Deepl, Zotero, Scite AI, Connected Papers and Humata—are extensively used for generating ideas, brainstorming, data analysis, drafting, grammar correction, translation and literature management. While students acknowledge the advantages of AI in enhancing speed and efficiency, they express concerns regarding its ethical implications and potential impact on critical thinking. Key ethical issues include maintaining academic integrity, ensuring manual verification of AI-generated content and avoiding overreliance. The study underscores that, although AI facilitates idea generation and technical tasks, it may undermine critical thinking and analytical skills. To uphold ethical standards and preserve intellectual rigour, the study advocates for a balanced use of AI, positioning it as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, critical scholarly practices.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Shortcut and Ethics: Navigating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing Among Indonesian Doctoral Students\",\"authors\":\"Hardiyanti Pratiwi,&nbsp; Suherman,&nbsp; Hasruddin,&nbsp;Muhammad Ridha\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in academic writing, leveraging advanced algorithms and natural language processing to significantly improve efficiency, quality and productivity. This study investigates the use of AI tools among Indonesian doctoral students, with a particular focus on ethical standards and their impact on critical thinking. Adopting a phenomenological approach, the research involved 81 participants who provided data through open-ended questionnaires, which were analysed thematically. The findings reveal that AI tools—such as ChatGPT, Deepl, Zotero, Scite AI, Connected Papers and Humata—are extensively used for generating ideas, brainstorming, data analysis, drafting, grammar correction, translation and literature management. While students acknowledge the advantages of AI in enhancing speed and efficiency, they express concerns regarding its ethical implications and potential impact on critical thinking. Key ethical issues include maintaining academic integrity, ensuring manual verification of AI-generated content and avoiding overreliance. The study underscores that, although AI facilitates idea generation and technical tasks, it may undermine critical thinking and analytical skills. To uphold ethical standards and preserve intellectual rigour, the study advocates for a balanced use of AI, positioning it as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, critical scholarly practices.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)已经成为学术写作的变革性工具,利用先进的算法和自然语言处理来显著提高效率、质量和生产力。本研究调查了印度尼西亚博士生使用人工智能工具的情况,特别关注道德标准及其对批判性思维的影响。采用现象学方法,研究涉及81名参与者,他们通过开放式问卷提供数据,并对其进行主题分析。研究结果显示,ChatGPT、Deepl、Zotero、Scite AI、Connected Papers和humata等人工智能工具被广泛用于产生想法、头脑风暴、数据分析、起草、语法纠正、翻译和文献管理。虽然学生们承认人工智能在提高速度和效率方面的优势,但他们对其伦理含义和对批判性思维的潜在影响表示担忧。关键的伦理问题包括维护学术诚信,确保人工智能生成内容的人工验证,以及避免过度依赖。该研究强调,尽管人工智能促进了创意产生和技术任务,但它可能会削弱批判性思维和分析能力。为了维护道德标准和保持学术严谨,该研究主张平衡使用人工智能,将其定位为对批判性学术实践的补充,而不是替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between Shortcut and Ethics: Navigating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing Among Indonesian Doctoral Students

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in academic writing, leveraging advanced algorithms and natural language processing to significantly improve efficiency, quality and productivity. This study investigates the use of AI tools among Indonesian doctoral students, with a particular focus on ethical standards and their impact on critical thinking. Adopting a phenomenological approach, the research involved 81 participants who provided data through open-ended questionnaires, which were analysed thematically. The findings reveal that AI tools—such as ChatGPT, Deepl, Zotero, Scite AI, Connected Papers and Humata—are extensively used for generating ideas, brainstorming, data analysis, drafting, grammar correction, translation and literature management. While students acknowledge the advantages of AI in enhancing speed and efficiency, they express concerns regarding its ethical implications and potential impact on critical thinking. Key ethical issues include maintaining academic integrity, ensuring manual verification of AI-generated content and avoiding overreliance. The study underscores that, although AI facilitates idea generation and technical tasks, it may undermine critical thinking and analytical skills. To uphold ethical standards and preserve intellectual rigour, the study advocates for a balanced use of AI, positioning it as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, critical scholarly practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信