抗假单胞菌药物单独和联合使用,加或不加克拉霉素对铜绿假单胞菌敏感和耐药菌株生长和生物膜形成的影响,以及暴露于香烟烟雾冷凝物的影响。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Moloko C Cholo, Charles Feldman, Ronald Anderson, Lebogang Sekalo, Naledi Moloko, Guy A Richards
{"title":"抗假单胞菌药物单独和联合使用,加或不加克拉霉素对铜绿假单胞菌敏感和耐药菌株生长和生物膜形成的影响,以及暴露于香烟烟雾冷凝物的影响。","authors":"Moloko C Cholo, Charles Feldman, Ronald Anderson, Lebogang Sekalo, Naledi Moloko, Guy A Richards","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14030325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b><i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (<i>Psa</i>) can circumvent antimicrobial chemotherapy, an ability enhanced by cigarette smoking (CS). This study probed potential benefits of combinations of anti-pseudomonal agents, and potential augmentation by a macrolide, in the absence or presence of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC). <b>Methods:</b> Two susceptible (WT: wild-type and DS: drug-sensitive) and one multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of <i>Psa</i> were treated with amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, individually and in combination, and with and without clarithromycin, followed by the measurement of planktonic growth and biofilm formation by spectrophotometry. Antibiotic interactions were determined using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) method. Effects on preformed biofilm density were measured following the addition of antibiotics: all procedures were performed in the absence and presence of CSC. <b>Results:</b> The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the three agents ranged from 0.125 mg/L to 1 mg/L (WT and DS strains) and 16 mg/L to 64 mg/L (MDR strain), with all resistant to clarithromycin (125 mg/L). MIC values closely correlated with the antibiotic concentrations required to inhibit biofilm formation. FICI revealed synergism between most combinations, with augmentation by clarithromycin. Amikacin had the greatest effect on biofilm density, which was potentiated by combination with the other antibiotics, particularly clarithromycin. Exposure to CSC had variable, albeit modest, effects on bacterial growth and biofilm formation, but low concentrations increased biofilm mass and attenuated synergistic antimicrobial interactions and effects on biofilm density. <b>Conclusions:</b> Amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, especially with clarithromycin, exhibit synergistic anti-pseudomonal activity and decrease preformed biofilm density. CSC attenuated these effects, illustrating the pro-infective potential of CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Anti-Pseudomonal Agents, Individually and in Combination, With or Without Clarithromycin, on Growth and Biofilm Formation by Antibiotic-Susceptible and -Resistant Strains of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa,</i> and the Impact of Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Condensate.\",\"authors\":\"Moloko C Cholo, Charles Feldman, Ronald Anderson, Lebogang Sekalo, Naledi Moloko, Guy A Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics14030325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b><i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (<i>Psa</i>) can circumvent antimicrobial chemotherapy, an ability enhanced by cigarette smoking (CS). This study probed potential benefits of combinations of anti-pseudomonal agents, and potential augmentation by a macrolide, in the absence or presence of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC). <b>Methods:</b> Two susceptible (WT: wild-type and DS: drug-sensitive) and one multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of <i>Psa</i> were treated with amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, individually and in combination, and with and without clarithromycin, followed by the measurement of planktonic growth and biofilm formation by spectrophotometry. Antibiotic interactions were determined using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) method. Effects on preformed biofilm density were measured following the addition of antibiotics: all procedures were performed in the absence and presence of CSC. <b>Results:</b> The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the three agents ranged from 0.125 mg/L to 1 mg/L (WT and DS strains) and 16 mg/L to 64 mg/L (MDR strain), with all resistant to clarithromycin (125 mg/L). MIC values closely correlated with the antibiotic concentrations required to inhibit biofilm formation. FICI revealed synergism between most combinations, with augmentation by clarithromycin. Amikacin had the greatest effect on biofilm density, which was potentiated by combination with the other antibiotics, particularly clarithromycin. Exposure to CSC had variable, albeit modest, effects on bacterial growth and biofilm formation, but low concentrations increased biofilm mass and attenuated synergistic antimicrobial interactions and effects on biofilm density. <b>Conclusions:</b> Amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, especially with clarithromycin, exhibit synergistic anti-pseudomonal activity and decrease preformed biofilm density. CSC attenuated these effects, illustrating the pro-infective potential of CS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939616/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030325\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:铜绿假单胞菌(Psa)可以规避抗微生物化疗,吸烟(CS)增强了这一能力。本研究探讨了在没有或存在香烟烟雾冷凝物(CSC)的情况下,抗假单胞菌药物组合的潜在益处,以及大环内酯的潜在增强作用。方法:分别用阿米卡星、头孢吡肟和环丙沙星治疗2株Psa敏感菌(WT:野生型,DS:药敏型)和1株多药耐药菌(MDR),分别单独和联合使用克拉霉素,用分光光度法测定浮游生物生长和生物膜形成情况。采用分数抑制浓度指数(FICI)法测定抗生素相互作用。在添加抗生素后测量对预成型生物膜密度的影响:所有程序都是在没有和存在CSC的情况下进行的。结果:3种药物的最小抑菌浓度(mic)范围为0.125 mg/L ~ 1 mg/L (WT和DS菌株),16 mg/L ~ 64 mg/L (MDR菌株),均对克拉霉素(125 mg/L)耐药。MIC值与抑制生物膜形成所需的抗生素浓度密切相关。FICI显示大多数组合之间具有协同作用,克拉霉素增强了协同作用。阿米卡星对生物膜密度的影响最大,与其他抗生素(尤其是克拉霉素)联合使用可增强生物膜密度。暴露于CSC对细菌生长和生物膜形成有不同的影响,尽管影响不大,但低浓度会增加生物膜质量,减弱协同抗菌相互作用和对生物膜密度的影响。结论:阿米卡星、头孢吡肟和环丙沙星具有协同抗假单胞菌活性,并可降低预成型生物膜密度,尤其是与克拉霉素联用时。CSC减弱了这些作用,说明了CS的促感染潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Anti-Pseudomonal Agents, Individually and in Combination, With or Without Clarithromycin, on Growth and Biofilm Formation by Antibiotic-Susceptible and -Resistant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the Impact of Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Condensate.

Background/Objectives:Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psa) can circumvent antimicrobial chemotherapy, an ability enhanced by cigarette smoking (CS). This study probed potential benefits of combinations of anti-pseudomonal agents, and potential augmentation by a macrolide, in the absence or presence of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC). Methods: Two susceptible (WT: wild-type and DS: drug-sensitive) and one multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of Psa were treated with amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, individually and in combination, and with and without clarithromycin, followed by the measurement of planktonic growth and biofilm formation by spectrophotometry. Antibiotic interactions were determined using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) method. Effects on preformed biofilm density were measured following the addition of antibiotics: all procedures were performed in the absence and presence of CSC. Results: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the three agents ranged from 0.125 mg/L to 1 mg/L (WT and DS strains) and 16 mg/L to 64 mg/L (MDR strain), with all resistant to clarithromycin (125 mg/L). MIC values closely correlated with the antibiotic concentrations required to inhibit biofilm formation. FICI revealed synergism between most combinations, with augmentation by clarithromycin. Amikacin had the greatest effect on biofilm density, which was potentiated by combination with the other antibiotics, particularly clarithromycin. Exposure to CSC had variable, albeit modest, effects on bacterial growth and biofilm formation, but low concentrations increased biofilm mass and attenuated synergistic antimicrobial interactions and effects on biofilm density. Conclusions: Amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, especially with clarithromycin, exhibit synergistic anti-pseudomonal activity and decrease preformed biofilm density. CSC attenuated these effects, illustrating the pro-infective potential of CS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信