跨模态相互作用和运动相关触觉门控:视觉的作用。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Maria Casado-Palacios, Alessia Tonelli, Claudio Campus, Monica Gori
{"title":"跨模态相互作用和运动相关触觉门控:视觉的作用。","authors":"Maria Casado-Palacios, Alessia Tonelli, Claudio Campus, Monica Gori","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15030288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When engaging with the environment, multisensory cues interact and are integrated to create a coherent representation of the world around us, a process that has been suggested to be affected by the lack of visual feedback in blind individuals. In addition, the presence of voluntary movement can be responsible for suppressing somatosensory information processed by the cortex, which might lead to a worse encoding of tactile information.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this work, we aim to explore how cross-modal interaction can be affected by active movements and the role of vision in this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To this end, we measured the precision of 18 blind individuals and 18 age-matched sighted controls in a velocity discrimination task. The participants were instructed to detect the faster stimulus between a sequence of two in both passive and active touch conditions. The sensory stimulation could be either just tactile or audio-tactile, where a non-informative sound co-occurred with the tactile stimulation. The measure of precision was obtained by computing the just noticeable difference (JND) of each participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show worse precision with the audio-tactile sensory stimulation in the active condition for the sighted group (<i>p</i> = 0.046) but not for the blind one (<i>p</i> = 0.513). For blind participants, only the movement itself had an effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For sighted individuals, the presence of noise from active touch made them vulnerable to auditory interference. However, the blind group exhibited less sensory interaction, experiencing only the detrimental effect of movement. Our work should be considered when developing next-generation haptic devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Modal Interactions and Movement-Related Tactile Gating: The Role of Vision.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Casado-Palacios, Alessia Tonelli, Claudio Campus, Monica Gori\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15030288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When engaging with the environment, multisensory cues interact and are integrated to create a coherent representation of the world around us, a process that has been suggested to be affected by the lack of visual feedback in blind individuals. In addition, the presence of voluntary movement can be responsible for suppressing somatosensory information processed by the cortex, which might lead to a worse encoding of tactile information.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this work, we aim to explore how cross-modal interaction can be affected by active movements and the role of vision in this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To this end, we measured the precision of 18 blind individuals and 18 age-matched sighted controls in a velocity discrimination task. The participants were instructed to detect the faster stimulus between a sequence of two in both passive and active touch conditions. The sensory stimulation could be either just tactile or audio-tactile, where a non-informative sound co-occurred with the tactile stimulation. The measure of precision was obtained by computing the just noticeable difference (JND) of each participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show worse precision with the audio-tactile sensory stimulation in the active condition for the sighted group (<i>p</i> = 0.046) but not for the blind one (<i>p</i> = 0.513). For blind participants, only the movement itself had an effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For sighted individuals, the presence of noise from active touch made them vulnerable to auditory interference. However, the blind group exhibited less sensory interaction, experiencing only the detrimental effect of movement. Our work should be considered when developing next-generation haptic devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939845/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030288\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当与环境接触时,多感官线索相互作用并整合以创建我们周围世界的连贯表示,这一过程被认为受到盲人缺乏视觉反馈的影响。此外,自主运动的存在可能会抑制由皮质处理的体感信息,这可能会导致触觉信息的编码变差。目的:在这项工作中,我们的目的是探索跨模态交互如何受到主动运动的影响以及视觉在这一过程中的作用。方法:我们测量了18名盲人和18名年龄匹配的正常人在速度辨别任务中的精度。参与者被要求在被动和主动触摸条件下,在两个序列之间检测更快的刺激。感官刺激既可以是触觉刺激,也可以是听觉刺激,其中非信息性声音与触觉刺激同时出现。通过计算每个参与者的刚好显着差异(JND)来获得精度度量。结果:听觉触觉刺激对正常组的识别精度较差(p = 0.046),对盲组的识别精度无显著影响(p = 0.513)。对于盲人参与者来说,只有运动本身有影响。结论:对于视力正常的人来说,主动触摸产生的噪音使他们容易受到听觉干扰。然而,盲人组表现出较少的感官互动,只经历了运动的有害影响。在开发下一代触觉设备时,应该考虑我们的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Modal Interactions and Movement-Related Tactile Gating: The Role of Vision.

Background: When engaging with the environment, multisensory cues interact and are integrated to create a coherent representation of the world around us, a process that has been suggested to be affected by the lack of visual feedback in blind individuals. In addition, the presence of voluntary movement can be responsible for suppressing somatosensory information processed by the cortex, which might lead to a worse encoding of tactile information.

Objectives: In this work, we aim to explore how cross-modal interaction can be affected by active movements and the role of vision in this process.

Methods: To this end, we measured the precision of 18 blind individuals and 18 age-matched sighted controls in a velocity discrimination task. The participants were instructed to detect the faster stimulus between a sequence of two in both passive and active touch conditions. The sensory stimulation could be either just tactile or audio-tactile, where a non-informative sound co-occurred with the tactile stimulation. The measure of precision was obtained by computing the just noticeable difference (JND) of each participant.

Results: The results show worse precision with the audio-tactile sensory stimulation in the active condition for the sighted group (p = 0.046) but not for the blind one (p = 0.513). For blind participants, only the movement itself had an effect.

Conclusions: For sighted individuals, the presence of noise from active touch made them vulnerable to auditory interference. However, the blind group exhibited less sensory interaction, experiencing only the detrimental effect of movement. Our work should be considered when developing next-generation haptic devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信