理解多样性的大脑:一项专注于三重网络的试点研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Taiko Otsuka, Keisuke Kokubun, Maya Okamoto, Yoshinori Yamakawa
{"title":"理解多样性的大脑:一项专注于三重网络的试点研究。","authors":"Taiko Otsuka, Keisuke Kokubun, Maya Okamoto, Yoshinori Yamakawa","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15030233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Interest in diversity is growing worldwide. Today, an understanding and social acceptance of diverse people is becoming increasingly important. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the relationship between an individual's gray matter volume (GMV), which is thought to reflect brain health, and their understanding of diversity (gender, sexuality (LGBTQ), and origin). <b>Methods</b>: GMV was determined as the value of the Gray Matter Brain Healthcare Quotient (GM-BHQ) based on MRI image analysis. Meanwhile, participants' understanding and acceptance of diversity was calculated based on their answers to the psychological questions included in the World Values Survey Wave 7 (WVS7). <b>Results</b>: Our analysis indicated that, in the group of participants with the highest understanding of diversity (PHUD. n = 11), not only the GMV at the whole brain level (t = 2.587, <i>p</i> = 0.027, Cohen's d = 0.780) but also the GMV of the central executive network (CEN: t = 2.700, <i>p</i>= 0.022, Cohen's d = 0.814) and saliency network (SN: t = 3.100, <i>p</i> = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.935) were shown to be significantly higher than the theoretical value estimated from sex, age, and BMI at the 5% level. In addition, the GMV of the default mode network (DMN: t = 2.063, <i>p</i> = 0.066, Cohen's d = 0.622) was also higher than the theoretical value at the 10% level. Meanwhile, in the group of others (n = 10), there was no significant difference from the theoretical value. These differences between PHUD and others were also observed when comparing the two with and without controlling for educational and occupational covariates at the 5% or 10% levels. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results suggest that understanding diversity requires a healthy brain, centered on three networks that govern rational judgment, emotion regulation, other-awareness, self-awareness, and the valuing of actions. This is the first study to show that brain structure is related to an understanding and acceptance of the diversity of people.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Brain That Understands Diversity: A Pilot Study Focusing on the Triple Network.\",\"authors\":\"Taiko Otsuka, Keisuke Kokubun, Maya Okamoto, Yoshinori Yamakawa\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15030233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Interest in diversity is growing worldwide. Today, an understanding and social acceptance of diverse people is becoming increasingly important. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the relationship between an individual's gray matter volume (GMV), which is thought to reflect brain health, and their understanding of diversity (gender, sexuality (LGBTQ), and origin). <b>Methods</b>: GMV was determined as the value of the Gray Matter Brain Healthcare Quotient (GM-BHQ) based on MRI image analysis. Meanwhile, participants' understanding and acceptance of diversity was calculated based on their answers to the psychological questions included in the World Values Survey Wave 7 (WVS7). <b>Results</b>: Our analysis indicated that, in the group of participants with the highest understanding of diversity (PHUD. n = 11), not only the GMV at the whole brain level (t = 2.587, <i>p</i> = 0.027, Cohen's d = 0.780) but also the GMV of the central executive network (CEN: t = 2.700, <i>p</i>= 0.022, Cohen's d = 0.814) and saliency network (SN: t = 3.100, <i>p</i> = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.935) were shown to be significantly higher than the theoretical value estimated from sex, age, and BMI at the 5% level. In addition, the GMV of the default mode network (DMN: t = 2.063, <i>p</i> = 0.066, Cohen's d = 0.622) was also higher than the theoretical value at the 10% level. Meanwhile, in the group of others (n = 10), there was no significant difference from the theoretical value. These differences between PHUD and others were also observed when comparing the two with and without controlling for educational and occupational covariates at the 5% or 10% levels. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results suggest that understanding diversity requires a healthy brain, centered on three networks that govern rational judgment, emotion regulation, other-awareness, self-awareness, and the valuing of actions. This is the first study to show that brain structure is related to an understanding and acceptance of the diversity of people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030233\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:世界范围内对多样性的兴趣正在增长。今天,对不同人群的理解和社会接受变得越来越重要。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在阐明个体的灰质体积(GMV)(被认为是反映大脑健康的指标)与他们对多样性(性别、性取向(LGBTQ)和起源)的理解之间的关系。方法:基于MRI图像分析,确定GMV为脑灰质保健商(GM-BHQ)值。同时,参与者对世界价值观调查第7波(WVS7)中的心理问题的回答计算了他们对多样性的理解和接受程度。结果:我们的分析表明,在对多样性理解程度最高的一组参与者中(PHUD)。n = 11),在5%水平下,不仅全脑GMV (t = 2.587, p= 0.027, Cohen’s d = 0.780),而且中枢执行网络GMV (CEN: t = 2.700, p= 0.022, Cohen’s d = 0.814)和显著性网络GMV (SN: t = 3.100, p= 0.011, Cohen’s d = 0.935)均显著高于性别、年龄和BMI的理论值。此外,在10%水平下,默认模式网络的GMV (DMN: t = 2.063, p = 0.066, Cohen’s d = 0.622)也高于理论值。同时,在其他组(n = 10)中,与理论值无显著差异。当在5%或10%的水平上控制教育和职业协变量时,对两者进行比较时,也观察到博士和其他大学之间的这些差异。结论:这些结果表明,理解多样性需要一个健康的大脑,以控制理性判断、情绪调节、他者意识、自我意识和行为评价的三个网络为中心。这是第一个表明大脑结构与理解和接受人的多样性有关的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Brain That Understands Diversity: A Pilot Study Focusing on the Triple Network.

Background/Objectives: Interest in diversity is growing worldwide. Today, an understanding and social acceptance of diverse people is becoming increasingly important. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the relationship between an individual's gray matter volume (GMV), which is thought to reflect brain health, and their understanding of diversity (gender, sexuality (LGBTQ), and origin). Methods: GMV was determined as the value of the Gray Matter Brain Healthcare Quotient (GM-BHQ) based on MRI image analysis. Meanwhile, participants' understanding and acceptance of diversity was calculated based on their answers to the psychological questions included in the World Values Survey Wave 7 (WVS7). Results: Our analysis indicated that, in the group of participants with the highest understanding of diversity (PHUD. n = 11), not only the GMV at the whole brain level (t = 2.587, p = 0.027, Cohen's d = 0.780) but also the GMV of the central executive network (CEN: t = 2.700, p= 0.022, Cohen's d = 0.814) and saliency network (SN: t = 3.100, p = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.935) were shown to be significantly higher than the theoretical value estimated from sex, age, and BMI at the 5% level. In addition, the GMV of the default mode network (DMN: t = 2.063, p = 0.066, Cohen's d = 0.622) was also higher than the theoretical value at the 10% level. Meanwhile, in the group of others (n = 10), there was no significant difference from the theoretical value. These differences between PHUD and others were also observed when comparing the two with and without controlling for educational and occupational covariates at the 5% or 10% levels. Conclusions: These results suggest that understanding diversity requires a healthy brain, centered on three networks that govern rational judgment, emotion regulation, other-awareness, self-awareness, and the valuing of actions. This is the first study to show that brain structure is related to an understanding and acceptance of the diversity of people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信