简答题对本科医学教育进展困难的预测能力。

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4
Keyna Bracken, Amr Saleh, Jeremy Sandor, Matthew Sibbald, Micheal Lee-Poy, Quang Ngo
{"title":"简答题对本科医学教育进展困难的预测能力。","authors":"Keyna Bracken, Amr Saleh, Jeremy Sandor, Matthew Sibbald, Micheal Lee-Poy, Quang Ngo","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To better understand the link between formative assessments and progress difficulty, we conducted an analysis in the undergraduate MD program of the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine by comparing formative assessment scores on Short Answer Questions (SAQ) called Concept Application Exercises (CAE) with subsequent progress difficulty. CAE scores are designed to formatively assess knowledge translation. These scores are not formally incorporated into the progress decision at the end of each curricular unit, which is holistic in nature. Students are referred to a student progress remediation committee if they fail to meet the curricular objectives. We sought to investigate the following research question: Do short answer questions, in the form of CAEs, predict subsequent learner progress difficulty?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the last four student cohorts of 2022-2025 were included. To address the predictive power of CAE score characteristics, a binary logistic regression model was constructed with remediation committee referral as the dependent variable and CAE score characteristics as the independent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that the average CAE score is the most powerful predictor of later progress difficulty, with each point drop in average score associated with a 37% increase in the odds of referral to the remediation committee.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings illustrate the predictive value of the SAQ to identify later progress difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 1","pages":"351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Predictive Power of Short Answer Questions in Undergraduate Medical Education Progress Difficulty.\",\"authors\":\"Keyna Bracken, Amr Saleh, Jeremy Sandor, Matthew Sibbald, Micheal Lee-Poy, Quang Ngo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To better understand the link between formative assessments and progress difficulty, we conducted an analysis in the undergraduate MD program of the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine by comparing formative assessment scores on Short Answer Questions (SAQ) called Concept Application Exercises (CAE) with subsequent progress difficulty. CAE scores are designed to formatively assess knowledge translation. These scores are not formally incorporated into the progress decision at the end of each curricular unit, which is holistic in nature. Students are referred to a student progress remediation committee if they fail to meet the curricular objectives. We sought to investigate the following research question: Do short answer questions, in the form of CAEs, predict subsequent learner progress difficulty?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the last four student cohorts of 2022-2025 were included. To address the predictive power of CAE score characteristics, a binary logistic regression model was constructed with remediation committee referral as the dependent variable and CAE score characteristics as the independent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that the average CAE score is the most powerful predictor of later progress difficulty, with each point drop in average score associated with a 37% increase in the odds of referral to the remediation committee.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings illustrate the predictive value of the SAQ to identify later progress difficulty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"351-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933568/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了更好地理解形成性评估与进步难度之间的联系,我们对Michael G. DeGroote医学院的本科医学硕士项目进行了一项分析,通过比较概念应用练习(CAE)的形成性评估(SAQ)得分与随后的进步难度。CAE分数是用来形式化地评估知识转化的。这些分数不会在每个课程单元结束时正式纳入进度决定,这是整体性质的。如果学生未能达到课程目标,将被转介给学生进度补救委员会。我们试图调查以下研究问题:cae形式的简答题能否预测随后的学习者进步难度?方法:纳入了2022-2025年最后四个学生队列的数据。为了研究CAE评分特征的预测能力,以补救委员会转诊为因变量,CAE评分特征为自变量,构建二元logistic回归模型。结果:本研究发现,CAE平均分是预测后续进展难度的最有力指标,平均分每下降一分,转介到补救委员会的几率就会增加37%。结论:这些发现说明了SAQ在识别后期进展困难方面的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Predictive Power of Short Answer Questions in Undergraduate Medical Education Progress Difficulty.

Background: To better understand the link between formative assessments and progress difficulty, we conducted an analysis in the undergraduate MD program of the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine by comparing formative assessment scores on Short Answer Questions (SAQ) called Concept Application Exercises (CAE) with subsequent progress difficulty. CAE scores are designed to formatively assess knowledge translation. These scores are not formally incorporated into the progress decision at the end of each curricular unit, which is holistic in nature. Students are referred to a student progress remediation committee if they fail to meet the curricular objectives. We sought to investigate the following research question: Do short answer questions, in the form of CAEs, predict subsequent learner progress difficulty?

Methods: Data from the last four student cohorts of 2022-2025 were included. To address the predictive power of CAE score characteristics, a binary logistic regression model was constructed with remediation committee referral as the dependent variable and CAE score characteristics as the independent variable.

Results: This study found that the average CAE score is the most powerful predictor of later progress difficulty, with each point drop in average score associated with a 37% increase in the odds of referral to the remediation committee.

Conclusion: These findings illustrate the predictive value of the SAQ to identify later progress difficulty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信