促进分数等效概念的个人学习:学生如何利用数字学习环境中的适应性特征来调节其效果

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Maria-Martine Oppmann , Maik Beege , Frank Reinhold
{"title":"促进分数等效概念的个人学习:学生如何利用数字学习环境中的适应性特征来调节其效果","authors":"Maria-Martine Oppmann ,&nbsp;Maik Beege ,&nbsp;Frank Reinhold","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Students face challenges when learning fractions. To support students' understanding of equivalent fractions, adaptive support can provide a variety of benefits. The purpose of this study is to utilize real-time process data to tailor students’ individual learning experience with adaptive support. We propose a mediation model to explain the positive effect of such adaptive features on learning outcomes by increased student engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted a 90-min RCT with a total of <em>N</em> <em>=</em> 300 sixth-grade students. Learning about equivalent fractions, an experimental group used an adaptive digital learning environment for practice. A control group used an equivalent non-adaptive, paper-based learning environment to practice the same tasks. Our hypothesis was that the two conditions showed different engagement during practice—explaining differences in learning outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>Results were in line with our mediation hypothesis: Using cluster analysis, we identified six user-profiles of students with differing behavioral and cognitive engagement during practice—utilizing process data (i.e., number of tasks and accuracy of solved tasks per difficulty level). These profiles were associated with different levels of perceived autonomy and competence support and perceived overload—and consequently learning outcomes. We also found a significant indirect mediation effect, emphasizing our hypothesis that adaptive support positively influences learning outcomes through its positive influence on students’ actual engagement during classroom practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulating individual learning of the concept of fraction equivalence: How students utilize adaptive features in digital learning environments mediates their effect\",\"authors\":\"Maria-Martine Oppmann ,&nbsp;Maik Beege ,&nbsp;Frank Reinhold\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Students face challenges when learning fractions. To support students' understanding of equivalent fractions, adaptive support can provide a variety of benefits. The purpose of this study is to utilize real-time process data to tailor students’ individual learning experience with adaptive support. We propose a mediation model to explain the positive effect of such adaptive features on learning outcomes by increased student engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted a 90-min RCT with a total of <em>N</em> <em>=</em> 300 sixth-grade students. Learning about equivalent fractions, an experimental group used an adaptive digital learning environment for practice. A control group used an equivalent non-adaptive, paper-based learning environment to practice the same tasks. Our hypothesis was that the two conditions showed different engagement during practice—explaining differences in learning outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>Results were in line with our mediation hypothesis: Using cluster analysis, we identified six user-profiles of students with differing behavioral and cognitive engagement during practice—utilizing process data (i.e., number of tasks and accuracy of solved tasks per difficulty level). These profiles were associated with different levels of perceived autonomy and competence support and perceived overload—and consequently learning outcomes. We also found a significant indirect mediation effect, emphasizing our hypothesis that adaptive support positively influences learning outcomes through its positive influence on students’ actual engagement during classroom practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000428\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生在学习分数时面临挑战。为了支持学生对等效分数的理解,适应性支持可以提供各种好处。本研究的目的是利用实时过程数据,以自适应支持来定制学生的个人学习体验。我们提出了一个中介模型来解释这种适应性特征通过提高学生参与度对学习成果的积极影响。方法对300名六年级学生进行90 min的随机对照试验。学习等效分数,实验组使用自适应数字学习环境进行练习。而对照组则使用同等的非适应性、基于纸张的学习环境来练习相同的任务。我们的假设是,这两种情况在实践中表现出不同的投入——解释了学习结果的差异。结果和讨论结果与我们的中介假设一致:使用聚类分析,我们确定了在实践利用过程数据(即每个难度级别的任务数量和解决任务的准确性)中具有不同行为和认知参与的学生的六种用户概况。这些概况与不同程度的感知自主性和能力支持以及感知超载有关,从而与学习结果有关。我们还发现了显著的间接中介效应,强调了我们的假设,即适应性支持通过对课堂实践中学生实际投入的积极影响来积极影响学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stimulating individual learning of the concept of fraction equivalence: How students utilize adaptive features in digital learning environments mediates their effect

Introduction

Students face challenges when learning fractions. To support students' understanding of equivalent fractions, adaptive support can provide a variety of benefits. The purpose of this study is to utilize real-time process data to tailor students’ individual learning experience with adaptive support. We propose a mediation model to explain the positive effect of such adaptive features on learning outcomes by increased student engagement.

Method

We conducted a 90-min RCT with a total of N = 300 sixth-grade students. Learning about equivalent fractions, an experimental group used an adaptive digital learning environment for practice. A control group used an equivalent non-adaptive, paper-based learning environment to practice the same tasks. Our hypothesis was that the two conditions showed different engagement during practice—explaining differences in learning outcomes.

Results and discussion

Results were in line with our mediation hypothesis: Using cluster analysis, we identified six user-profiles of students with differing behavioral and cognitive engagement during practice—utilizing process data (i.e., number of tasks and accuracy of solved tasks per difficulty level). These profiles were associated with different levels of perceived autonomy and competence support and perceived overload—and consequently learning outcomes. We also found a significant indirect mediation effect, emphasizing our hypothesis that adaptive support positively influences learning outcomes through its positive influence on students’ actual engagement during classroom practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信