研究自杀高危人群正念干预中出现的困难经历的发生和临床影响。

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mindfulness Pub Date : 2024-06-18
Alejandro Interian, Rachael Miller, Chintan Dave, Miriam Latorre, Lauren St Hill, Arlene King, Dianna R Boschulte, Anna Kline, David Siegel, Megan M Sedita, Megan S Chesin
{"title":"研究自杀高危人群正念干预中出现的困难经历的发生和临床影响。","authors":"Alejandro Interian, Rachael Miller, Chintan Dave, Miriam Latorre, Lauren St Hill, Arlene King, Dianna R Boschulte, Anna Kline, David Siegel, Megan M Sedita, Megan S Chesin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Experiences of difficulty (e.g., anxiety, difficult emotions) can occur during mindfulness practice. This study characterized the occurrence of such difficulties, defined as abnormal distress, dysregulation or agitation, among high suicide risk participants during a mindfulness-based intervention. The study also evaluated whether mindfulness difficulties were associated with baseline differences or poorer outcomes during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i>=50; mean age=49 years, 84% male, 24% Latinx) were from the Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Suicide Prevention (MBCT-S) trial. Occurrences of mindfulness difficulties were identified via systematic review of progress notes. Serious clinical outcomes (suicidal events, suicide attempts, and psychiatric hospitalizations) were tracked over 12-months follow-up. Participants experiencing difficulties during MBCT-S were compared to those who did not on baseline characteristics and serious clinical outcomes. Incidence density sampling and Cox proportional regression analyses tested whether experiencing difficulties during mindfulness increased the risk of subsequent serious clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18% of participants had difficulty during mindfulness practice, which mostly included experiences of anxiety or hallucinations. Those experiencing difficulty showed several diagnostic differences at baseline, but were not at significantly greater risk of a suicidal event, <i>HR</i> 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14 - 2.71) or an acute psychiatric hospitalization, <i>HR</i> 0.85 (95% CI: 0.19 - 3.82). There were no suicide attempts among the 9 participants who experienced mindfulness difficulty, compared to 5 suicide attempts in those without mindfulness difficulty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Difficulties during mindfulness practice were common, but did not show increased risk of serious clinical outcomes in participants at high-risk of suicide.</p><p><strong>Preregistration: </strong>This study reports findings from a secondary analyses of a randomized clinical trial that was preregistered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01872338).</p>","PeriodicalId":18523,"journal":{"name":"Mindfulness","volume":"15 ","pages":"1701-1712"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Difficult Experiences that Emerge during a Mindfulness-Based Intervention among Individuals at High-Risk of Suicide.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Interian, Rachael Miller, Chintan Dave, Miriam Latorre, Lauren St Hill, Arlene King, Dianna R Boschulte, Anna Kline, David Siegel, Megan M Sedita, Megan S Chesin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Experiences of difficulty (e.g., anxiety, difficult emotions) can occur during mindfulness practice. This study characterized the occurrence of such difficulties, defined as abnormal distress, dysregulation or agitation, among high suicide risk participants during a mindfulness-based intervention. The study also evaluated whether mindfulness difficulties were associated with baseline differences or poorer outcomes during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i>=50; mean age=49 years, 84% male, 24% Latinx) were from the Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Suicide Prevention (MBCT-S) trial. Occurrences of mindfulness difficulties were identified via systematic review of progress notes. Serious clinical outcomes (suicidal events, suicide attempts, and psychiatric hospitalizations) were tracked over 12-months follow-up. Participants experiencing difficulties during MBCT-S were compared to those who did not on baseline characteristics and serious clinical outcomes. Incidence density sampling and Cox proportional regression analyses tested whether experiencing difficulties during mindfulness increased the risk of subsequent serious clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18% of participants had difficulty during mindfulness practice, which mostly included experiences of anxiety or hallucinations. Those experiencing difficulty showed several diagnostic differences at baseline, but were not at significantly greater risk of a suicidal event, <i>HR</i> 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14 - 2.71) or an acute psychiatric hospitalization, <i>HR</i> 0.85 (95% CI: 0.19 - 3.82). There were no suicide attempts among the 9 participants who experienced mindfulness difficulty, compared to 5 suicide attempts in those without mindfulness difficulty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Difficulties during mindfulness practice were common, but did not show increased risk of serious clinical outcomes in participants at high-risk of suicide.</p><p><strong>Preregistration: </strong>This study reports findings from a secondary analyses of a randomized clinical trial that was preregistered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01872338).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mindfulness\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1701-1712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931679/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mindfulness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mindfulness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在正念练习中可能会出现困难体验(如焦虑、困难情绪)。本研究描述了这些困难的发生,定义为异常痛苦,失调或躁动,在高自杀风险的参与者中进行正念干预。该研究还评估了正念困难是否与基线差异或随访期间较差的结果有关。方法:受试者(n=50;平均年龄=49岁,84%男性,24%拉丁裔)来自基于正念的自杀预防认知疗法(MBCT-S)试验。通过对进度记录的系统回顾,确定了正念困难的发生。严重的临床结果(自杀事件、自杀未遂和精神住院)在12个月的随访中被追踪。在MBCT-S过程中遇到困难的参与者与没有遇到困难的参与者进行基线特征和严重临床结果的比较。发生率密度抽样和Cox比例回归分析测试了在正念期间遇到困难是否会增加随后严重临床结果的风险。结果:18%的参与者在正念练习中有困难,主要包括焦虑或幻觉的经历。经历困难的患者在基线时显示出一些诊断差异,但自杀事件的风险没有显著增加,HR 0.62(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.14 - 2.71)或急性精神住院,HR 0.85(95%可信区间:0.19 - 3.82)。经历正念困难的9名参与者中没有自杀企图,而没有正念困难的参与者中有5人自杀企图。结论:正念练习中的困难是常见的,但在自杀高风险的参与者中没有显示出严重临床结果的风险增加。预注册:本研究报告了一项随机临床试验的二次分析结果,该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01872338)预注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Difficult Experiences that Emerge during a Mindfulness-Based Intervention among Individuals at High-Risk of Suicide.

Objective: Experiences of difficulty (e.g., anxiety, difficult emotions) can occur during mindfulness practice. This study characterized the occurrence of such difficulties, defined as abnormal distress, dysregulation or agitation, among high suicide risk participants during a mindfulness-based intervention. The study also evaluated whether mindfulness difficulties were associated with baseline differences or poorer outcomes during follow-up.

Method: Participants (n=50; mean age=49 years, 84% male, 24% Latinx) were from the Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Suicide Prevention (MBCT-S) trial. Occurrences of mindfulness difficulties were identified via systematic review of progress notes. Serious clinical outcomes (suicidal events, suicide attempts, and psychiatric hospitalizations) were tracked over 12-months follow-up. Participants experiencing difficulties during MBCT-S were compared to those who did not on baseline characteristics and serious clinical outcomes. Incidence density sampling and Cox proportional regression analyses tested whether experiencing difficulties during mindfulness increased the risk of subsequent serious clinical outcomes.

Results: 18% of participants had difficulty during mindfulness practice, which mostly included experiences of anxiety or hallucinations. Those experiencing difficulty showed several diagnostic differences at baseline, but were not at significantly greater risk of a suicidal event, HR 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14 - 2.71) or an acute psychiatric hospitalization, HR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.19 - 3.82). There were no suicide attempts among the 9 participants who experienced mindfulness difficulty, compared to 5 suicide attempts in those without mindfulness difficulty.

Conclusions: Difficulties during mindfulness practice were common, but did not show increased risk of serious clinical outcomes in participants at high-risk of suicide.

Preregistration: This study reports findings from a secondary analyses of a randomized clinical trial that was preregistered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01872338).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mindfulness
Mindfulness Multiple-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
19.40%
发文量
224
期刊介绍: Mindfulness seeks to advance research, clinical practice, and theory on mindfulness. It is interested in manuscripts from diverse viewpoints, including psychology, psychiatry, medicine, neurobiology, psychoneuroendocrinology, cognitive, behavioral, cultural, philosophy, spirituality, and wisdom traditions. Mindfulness encourages research submissions on the reliability and validity of assessment of mindfulness; clinical uses of mindfulness in psychological distress, psychiatric disorders, and medical conditions; alleviation of personal and societal suffering; the nature and foundations of mindfulness; mechanisms of action; and the use of mindfulness across cultures. The Journal also seeks to promote the use of mindfulness by publishing scholarly papers on the training of clinicians, institutional staff, teachers, parents, and industry personnel in mindful provision of services. Examples of topics include: Mindfulness-based psycho-educational interventions for children with learning, emotional, and behavioral disorders Treating depression and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure Yoga and mindfulness Cognitive-behavioral mindfulness group therapy interventions Mindfulnessness and emotional regulation difficulties in children Loving-kindness meditation to increase social connectedness Training for parents and children with ADHD Recovery from substance abuse Changing parents’ mindfulness Child management skills Treating childhood anxiety and depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信