导航神经分化:指导卫生专业教育工作者的范围审查。

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Laura Gray, Bryony McNeill, Laura Pecora, Susie Macfarlane, Alexa Hayley, Danielle Hitch, Sherryn Evans
{"title":"导航神经分化:指导卫生专业教育工作者的范围审查。","authors":"Laura Gray, Bryony McNeill, Laura Pecora, Susie Macfarlane, Alexa Hayley, Danielle Hitch, Sherryn Evans","doi":"10.1111/medu.15676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To create inclusive learning environments where neurodivergent students can learn and thrive, educators must appreciate their unique perspectives and experiences. This is particularly crucial in health professions courses, where students may face additional pressures as they undertake placements in clinical environments where neurodivergence is misrepresented or misunderstood. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is necessary to identify the available data to guide educators and pinpoint areas that warrant further exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review methodology, informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, was used to guide a search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINHAL, ERIC and PsycINFO), considering sources of primary data and analysis published up to June 2024. The retrieved literature was screened based on the inclusion criteria. Bibliographic data was extracted, and the included papers (n = 69) were reviewed and the themes charted using a framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the included literature indicated some clear trends over time, with earlier papers predominantly focussing on dyslexia or framing neurodiverg as a form of disability. More recently there has been an increase in the number of papers specifically exploring the experiences of students identifying as neurodivergent, or the perspectives of educators. Narratives evident in the literature centred around relationships between a neurodivergent identity and a developing professional identity, challenges around disclosure, seeking effective accommodations in a stigmatising environment and the impact of educator perspectives.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the framing of neurodivergence has changed over time, a consistent finding is that neurodivergent students in health professions programmes are expected to conform to learning environments that exclude them and do not support their learning. Further evidence is required to inform recommendations for educators on how to provide safer learning environments which enable neurodivergent students to thrive.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating neurodivergence: A scoping review to guide health professions educators.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Gray, Bryony McNeill, Laura Pecora, Susie Macfarlane, Alexa Hayley, Danielle Hitch, Sherryn Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To create inclusive learning environments where neurodivergent students can learn and thrive, educators must appreciate their unique perspectives and experiences. This is particularly crucial in health professions courses, where students may face additional pressures as they undertake placements in clinical environments where neurodivergence is misrepresented or misunderstood. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is necessary to identify the available data to guide educators and pinpoint areas that warrant further exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review methodology, informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, was used to guide a search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINHAL, ERIC and PsycINFO), considering sources of primary data and analysis published up to June 2024. The retrieved literature was screened based on the inclusion criteria. Bibliographic data was extracted, and the included papers (n = 69) were reviewed and the themes charted using a framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the included literature indicated some clear trends over time, with earlier papers predominantly focussing on dyslexia or framing neurodiverg as a form of disability. More recently there has been an increase in the number of papers specifically exploring the experiences of students identifying as neurodivergent, or the perspectives of educators. Narratives evident in the literature centred around relationships between a neurodivergent identity and a developing professional identity, challenges around disclosure, seeking effective accommodations in a stigmatising environment and the impact of educator perspectives.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the framing of neurodivergence has changed over time, a consistent finding is that neurodivergent students in health professions programmes are expected to conform to learning environments that exclude them and do not support their learning. Further evidence is required to inform recommendations for educators on how to provide safer learning environments which enable neurodivergent students to thrive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15676\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了创造包容的学习环境,让神经发散型学生能够学习和成长,教育者必须欣赏他们独特的观点和经历。这在卫生专业课程中尤其重要,因为学生在临床环境中进行实习时,神经分化可能会被歪曲或误解,因此他们可能面临额外的压力。对现有文献的全面审查是必要的,以确定可用的数据来指导教育工作者和确定值得进一步探索的领域。方法:采用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所方法指导的范围审查方法,对四个电子数据库(MEDLINE、CINHAL、ERIC和PsycINFO)进行检索,考虑到截至2024年6月发表的主要数据和分析的来源。根据纳入标准对检索到的文献进行筛选。提取书目数据,对纳入的论文(n = 69)进行审查,并使用框架方法绘制主题图。结果:对纳入文献的分析表明,随着时间的推移,一些明确的趋势,早期的论文主要集中在阅读障碍或将神经分化视为残疾的一种形式。最近,有越来越多的论文专门探讨神经发散性学生的经历,或者教育工作者的观点。文献中明显的叙述集中在神经发散性身份和发展中的职业身份之间的关系,披露的挑战,在污名化的环境中寻求有效的适应以及教育者观点的影响。讨论:尽管神经分化的框架随着时间的推移而改变,一个一致的发现是,在卫生专业课程中,神经分化的学生被期望遵守排斥他们、不支持他们学习的学习环境。需要进一步的证据来为教育工作者提供有关如何提供更安全的学习环境以使神经发散型学生茁壮成长的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating neurodivergence: A scoping review to guide health professions educators.

Introduction: To create inclusive learning environments where neurodivergent students can learn and thrive, educators must appreciate their unique perspectives and experiences. This is particularly crucial in health professions courses, where students may face additional pressures as they undertake placements in clinical environments where neurodivergence is misrepresented or misunderstood. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is necessary to identify the available data to guide educators and pinpoint areas that warrant further exploration.

Methods: Scoping review methodology, informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, was used to guide a search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINHAL, ERIC and PsycINFO), considering sources of primary data and analysis published up to June 2024. The retrieved literature was screened based on the inclusion criteria. Bibliographic data was extracted, and the included papers (n = 69) were reviewed and the themes charted using a framework approach.

Results: Analysis of the included literature indicated some clear trends over time, with earlier papers predominantly focussing on dyslexia or framing neurodiverg as a form of disability. More recently there has been an increase in the number of papers specifically exploring the experiences of students identifying as neurodivergent, or the perspectives of educators. Narratives evident in the literature centred around relationships between a neurodivergent identity and a developing professional identity, challenges around disclosure, seeking effective accommodations in a stigmatising environment and the impact of educator perspectives.

Discussion: Although the framing of neurodivergence has changed over time, a consistent finding is that neurodivergent students in health professions programmes are expected to conform to learning environments that exclude them and do not support their learning. Further evidence is required to inform recommendations for educators on how to provide safer learning environments which enable neurodivergent students to thrive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信