“第三极”药食同源作物枸杞上吡蚜酮、螺虫及其四种代谢物的降解、加工因素及风险评价研究

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hongyu Chen, Wei Li, Haixia Zhu, Hua Weng* and Shuo Shen*, 
{"title":"“第三极”药食同源作物枸杞上吡蚜酮、螺虫及其四种代谢物的降解、加工因素及风险评价研究","authors":"Hongyu Chen,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Haixia Zhu,&nbsp;Hua Weng* and Shuo Shen*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.4c1034310.1021/acs.jafc.4c10343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, and agricultural commodities are generally consumed as processed foods. How effective these processing procedures are at removing pesticide residues is not well understood. We report initial concentrations of one pesticide that is used extensively on crops of Goji berries, spirotetramat (and its four metabolites: spirotetramat-enol, spirotetramat-enol-glucoside, spirotetramat-monohydroxy, and spirotetramat-keto-hydroxy), and pymetrozine, to be 231.31, 297.42, 229.15, 252.33, 292.73, and 83.18 μg kg<sup>–1</sup>, respectively. Only 0.18–3.18% of pesticides were eliminated from produce by maceration and washing. Pesticide reduction during processing was 21.23–58.72% (traditional methods), 33.86–73.66% (by cooking samples), and 71.24–90.23% (through vinification), with corresponding processing factors (PFs), a measure of how processing technique affects pesticide residue levels, 0.111–0.771, 0.016–2.33, and 0.008–43.1. For traditional methods, in particular, the PFs of pesticides were 1.77–43.1, suggesting that considerable pesticide enrichment occurred. Combined with the field trial and PF residue data, the acute and chronic dietary risks of pesticides using these processing methods ranged 0.031–1.83 and 0.002–2.51%, respectively. This study provides basic information that can be used to evaluate the potential risks to health of exposure to pesticide residues.</p>","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"73 12","pages":"7423–7431 7423–7431"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights on Degradation, Processing Factors, and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Pymetrozine, Spirotetramat, and Its Four Metabolites on Goji Berry: “Third Pole” Medicine and Food Homologous Crop\",\"authors\":\"Hongyu Chen,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Haixia Zhu,&nbsp;Hua Weng* and Shuo Shen*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jafc.4c1034310.1021/acs.jafc.4c10343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, and agricultural commodities are generally consumed as processed foods. How effective these processing procedures are at removing pesticide residues is not well understood. We report initial concentrations of one pesticide that is used extensively on crops of Goji berries, spirotetramat (and its four metabolites: spirotetramat-enol, spirotetramat-enol-glucoside, spirotetramat-monohydroxy, and spirotetramat-keto-hydroxy), and pymetrozine, to be 231.31, 297.42, 229.15, 252.33, 292.73, and 83.18 μg kg<sup>–1</sup>, respectively. Only 0.18–3.18% of pesticides were eliminated from produce by maceration and washing. Pesticide reduction during processing was 21.23–58.72% (traditional methods), 33.86–73.66% (by cooking samples), and 71.24–90.23% (through vinification), with corresponding processing factors (PFs), a measure of how processing technique affects pesticide residue levels, 0.111–0.771, 0.016–2.33, and 0.008–43.1. For traditional methods, in particular, the PFs of pesticides were 1.77–43.1, suggesting that considerable pesticide enrichment occurred. Combined with the field trial and PF residue data, the acute and chronic dietary risks of pesticides using these processing methods ranged 0.031–1.83 and 0.002–2.51%, respectively. This study provides basic information that can be used to evaluate the potential risks to health of exposure to pesticide residues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"73 12\",\"pages\":\"7423–7431 7423–7431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10343\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农药在农业中被广泛使用,农产品一般作为加工食品食用。人们对这些加工程序在去除农药残留方面的效果还不甚了解。我们的报告显示,在枸杞作物上广泛使用的一种杀虫剂--螺环酯(及其四种代谢物:螺环酯-烯醇、螺环酯-烯醇-葡萄糖苷、螺环酯-单羟基和螺环酯-酮-羟基)和吡虫啉的初始浓度分别为 231.分别为 231.31、297.42、229.15、252.33、292.73 和 83.18 μg kg-1。通过浸渍和清洗,农产品中的农药去除率仅为 0.18-3.18%。在加工过程中,农药减少量分别为 21.23%-58.72%(传统方法)、33.86%-73.66%(烹饪样本)和 71.24%-90.23%(酿造),相应的加工系数(PFs)为 0.111-0.771、0.016-2.33 和 0.008-43.1。特别是在传统方法中,农药的 PF 值为 1.77-43.1,这表明农药的富集程度相当高。结合现场试验和 PF 残留数据,这些加工方法的农药急性和慢性膳食风险分别为 0.031-1.83% 和 0.002-2.51%。这项研究提供了基本信息,可用于评估接触农药残留对健康的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Insights on Degradation, Processing Factors, and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Pymetrozine, Spirotetramat, and Its Four Metabolites on Goji Berry: “Third Pole” Medicine and Food Homologous Crop

Insights on Degradation, Processing Factors, and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Pymetrozine, Spirotetramat, and Its Four Metabolites on Goji Berry: “Third Pole” Medicine and Food Homologous Crop

Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, and agricultural commodities are generally consumed as processed foods. How effective these processing procedures are at removing pesticide residues is not well understood. We report initial concentrations of one pesticide that is used extensively on crops of Goji berries, spirotetramat (and its four metabolites: spirotetramat-enol, spirotetramat-enol-glucoside, spirotetramat-monohydroxy, and spirotetramat-keto-hydroxy), and pymetrozine, to be 231.31, 297.42, 229.15, 252.33, 292.73, and 83.18 μg kg–1, respectively. Only 0.18–3.18% of pesticides were eliminated from produce by maceration and washing. Pesticide reduction during processing was 21.23–58.72% (traditional methods), 33.86–73.66% (by cooking samples), and 71.24–90.23% (through vinification), with corresponding processing factors (PFs), a measure of how processing technique affects pesticide residue levels, 0.111–0.771, 0.016–2.33, and 0.008–43.1. For traditional methods, in particular, the PFs of pesticides were 1.77–43.1, suggesting that considerable pesticide enrichment occurred. Combined with the field trial and PF residue data, the acute and chronic dietary risks of pesticides using these processing methods ranged 0.031–1.83 and 0.002–2.51%, respectively. This study provides basic information that can be used to evaluate the potential risks to health of exposure to pesticide residues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.20%
发文量
1375
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research representing complete studies and research advances dealing with the chemistry and biochemistry of agriculture and food. The Journal also encourages papers with chemistry and/or biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensory/nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to agriculture and/or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信