在我的零售商的一点帮助下:消费者接受营养决定有助于支持健康的杂货购物。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Wieteke de Vries, Koert van Ittersum, Jenny van Doorn
{"title":"在我的零售商的一点帮助下:消费者接受营养决定有助于支持健康的杂货购物。","authors":"Wieteke de Vries,&nbsp;Koert van Ittersum,&nbsp;Jenny van Doorn","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labels are increasingly implemented as an intervention for promoting healthier purchases. However, the impact of FOP labels on actual purchase decisions appears to remain rather limited. As healthy grocery shopping is an effortful and difficult task, shoppers may benefit from additional support. Therefore, this study examines shopper acceptance of seven <em>nutritional decision aids</em> (NDAs), tools that support shoppers with the identification and purchases of healthier food alternatives. We designed seven NDAs based on established (online) decision aids such as filtering and sorting and incorporated nutritional information (<em>i.e.,</em> Nutri-Score) to support healthy purchase decisions. We argue that coercive pressures embedded in the design of NDAs increase shoppers’ perceived intrusiveness, which in turn decreases NDA acceptance. Results from Study 1 show that the NDAs systematically vary in their degree of coercive pressure exerted on shoppers to make healthier purchase decisions (NDA coerciveness). Study 2, a large study among heads of household (<em>n</em> = 1031), demonstrates that when NDAs exert a high degree of pressure to make a healthy purchase decision, NDA acceptance decreases. Additionally, study results show that NDA coerciveness increases perceived intrusiveness, which in turn decreases acceptance, explaining part of the underlying mechanism. Lastly, we find that the effect of NDA coerciveness on perceived intrusiveness is less (more) pronounced for shoppers with high (low) healthy eating interests. Overall, the results of this research yield novel insights for the development of effective health interventions in grocery stores that benefit shoppers as well as retailers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"With a little help from my retailer: Shopper acceptance of nutritional decision aids supporting healthy grocery shopping\",\"authors\":\"Wieteke de Vries,&nbsp;Koert van Ittersum,&nbsp;Jenny van Doorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labels are increasingly implemented as an intervention for promoting healthier purchases. However, the impact of FOP labels on actual purchase decisions appears to remain rather limited. As healthy grocery shopping is an effortful and difficult task, shoppers may benefit from additional support. Therefore, this study examines shopper acceptance of seven <em>nutritional decision aids</em> (NDAs), tools that support shoppers with the identification and purchases of healthier food alternatives. We designed seven NDAs based on established (online) decision aids such as filtering and sorting and incorporated nutritional information (<em>i.e.,</em> Nutri-Score) to support healthy purchase decisions. We argue that coercive pressures embedded in the design of NDAs increase shoppers’ perceived intrusiveness, which in turn decreases NDA acceptance. Results from Study 1 show that the NDAs systematically vary in their degree of coercive pressure exerted on shoppers to make healthier purchase decisions (NDA coerciveness). Study 2, a large study among heads of household (<em>n</em> = 1031), demonstrates that when NDAs exert a high degree of pressure to make a healthy purchase decision, NDA acceptance decreases. Additionally, study results show that NDA coerciveness increases perceived intrusiveness, which in turn decreases acceptance, explaining part of the underlying mechanism. Lastly, we find that the effect of NDA coerciveness on perceived intrusiveness is less (more) pronounced for shoppers with high (low) healthy eating interests. Overall, the results of this research yield novel insights for the development of effective health interventions in grocery stores that benefit shoppers as well as retailers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包装正面(FOP)营养标签越来越多地作为一种干预措施,以促进更健康的购买。然而,FOP标签对实际购买决策的影响似乎仍然相当有限。由于健康的杂货店购物是一项费力而困难的任务,购物者可能会从额外的支持中受益。因此,本研究考察了购物者对七种营养决策辅助工具(NDAs)的接受程度,这些工具支持购物者识别和购买更健康的食品替代品。我们设计了7个nda,基于现有的(在线)决策辅助工具,如过滤和分类,并纳入营养信息(即nutrition - score),以支持健康的购买决策。我们认为,嵌入在NDA设计中的强制压力增加了购物者的感知侵入性,这反过来又降低了NDA的接受度。研究1的结果表明,NDA对购物者施加的强制压力(NDA强制)程度存在系统性差异。研究2,一项针对户主的大型研究(n = 1031)表明,当NDA对做出健康的购买决策施加高度压力时,NDA接受度会下降。此外,研究结果表明,NDA胁迫增加了感知侵入性,而感知侵入性反过来又降低了接受性,这解释了部分潜在机制。最后,我们发现,对于健康饮食兴趣高(低)的购物者,NDA胁迫对感知侵入性的影响较小(更明显)。总的来说,这项研究的结果为杂货店有效的健康干预措施的发展提供了新的见解,这对购物者和零售商都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
With a little help from my retailer: Shopper acceptance of nutritional decision aids supporting healthy grocery shopping
Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labels are increasingly implemented as an intervention for promoting healthier purchases. However, the impact of FOP labels on actual purchase decisions appears to remain rather limited. As healthy grocery shopping is an effortful and difficult task, shoppers may benefit from additional support. Therefore, this study examines shopper acceptance of seven nutritional decision aids (NDAs), tools that support shoppers with the identification and purchases of healthier food alternatives. We designed seven NDAs based on established (online) decision aids such as filtering and sorting and incorporated nutritional information (i.e., Nutri-Score) to support healthy purchase decisions. We argue that coercive pressures embedded in the design of NDAs increase shoppers’ perceived intrusiveness, which in turn decreases NDA acceptance. Results from Study 1 show that the NDAs systematically vary in their degree of coercive pressure exerted on shoppers to make healthier purchase decisions (NDA coerciveness). Study 2, a large study among heads of household (n = 1031), demonstrates that when NDAs exert a high degree of pressure to make a healthy purchase decision, NDA acceptance decreases. Additionally, study results show that NDA coerciveness increases perceived intrusiveness, which in turn decreases acceptance, explaining part of the underlying mechanism. Lastly, we find that the effect of NDA coerciveness on perceived intrusiveness is less (more) pronounced for shoppers with high (low) healthy eating interests. Overall, the results of this research yield novel insights for the development of effective health interventions in grocery stores that benefit shoppers as well as retailers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信