评估室内照明解决方案的新框架及其在考虑能源效率和人为因素的高等教育机构示范学习空间中的应用

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Sourin Bhattacharya , Susmita Bhattacharya , Abhishek Das , Shibsankar Mahata , Sujash Biswas
{"title":"评估室内照明解决方案的新框架及其在考虑能源效率和人为因素的高等教育机构示范学习空间中的应用","authors":"Sourin Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Susmita Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Abhishek Das ,&nbsp;Shibsankar Mahata ,&nbsp;Sujash Biswas","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indoor lighting planning, design, and commissioning should be performed with a panoptic view of financial incurrences, energy efficiency, photometric parameters, non-visual aspects, and human factors, and a practicable indoor lighting assessment framework can make thorough evaluations of proffered lighting designs of indoor spaces including classrooms of educational institutions. This study presents a comprehensive indoor lighting assessment framework, formulated with the assistance of the Delphi method of reaching expert consensus and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) of assigning weightage to each criterion, with three distinct criteria or rubrics: Energy Efficiency and Financial Aspects (EFFA), Visual and Non-Visual Effects (VNVE), and Occupants’ Perception and Comfort (OPC). A maximum composite score of 5 is awarded for each proffered lighting solution. This framework was applied for the evaluation of several candidate lighting solutions based on incandescent, fluorescent, and light-emitting diode (LED) lamps for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution in West Bengal, India, and the LED Downlight-based lighting system with a Correlated Colour Temperature (CCT) of 4816 K of a model lecture theatre received the highest composite score of 4.00 out of 5.00 and maximized OPC (4.61 out of 5.00). In addition, LED-based lighting systems outscored the conventional counterparts by at least 7.85 %. The novelty of the introduced framework lies in its emphasis on interlacing energy performance, financial incurrences, ergonomics, and visual comfort in a unified evaluation model, offering a pragmatic-cum-productivist tool for indoor lighting design and assessment, particularly in regions and provinces lacking formal ergonomic lighting design and evaluation regulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 115625"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel framework for the assessment of indoor lighting solutions and its application for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution considering energy efficiency and human factors\",\"authors\":\"Sourin Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Susmita Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Abhishek Das ,&nbsp;Shibsankar Mahata ,&nbsp;Sujash Biswas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Indoor lighting planning, design, and commissioning should be performed with a panoptic view of financial incurrences, energy efficiency, photometric parameters, non-visual aspects, and human factors, and a practicable indoor lighting assessment framework can make thorough evaluations of proffered lighting designs of indoor spaces including classrooms of educational institutions. This study presents a comprehensive indoor lighting assessment framework, formulated with the assistance of the Delphi method of reaching expert consensus and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) of assigning weightage to each criterion, with three distinct criteria or rubrics: Energy Efficiency and Financial Aspects (EFFA), Visual and Non-Visual Effects (VNVE), and Occupants’ Perception and Comfort (OPC). A maximum composite score of 5 is awarded for each proffered lighting solution. This framework was applied for the evaluation of several candidate lighting solutions based on incandescent, fluorescent, and light-emitting diode (LED) lamps for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution in West Bengal, India, and the LED Downlight-based lighting system with a Correlated Colour Temperature (CCT) of 4816 K of a model lecture theatre received the highest composite score of 4.00 out of 5.00 and maximized OPC (4.61 out of 5.00). In addition, LED-based lighting systems outscored the conventional counterparts by at least 7.85 %. The novelty of the introduced framework lies in its emphasis on interlacing energy performance, financial incurrences, ergonomics, and visual comfort in a unified evaluation model, offering a pragmatic-cum-productivist tool for indoor lighting design and assessment, particularly in regions and provinces lacking formal ergonomic lighting design and evaluation regulations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":\"336 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877882500355X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877882500355X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在进行室内照明规划、设计和调试时,应全面考虑财务支出、能源效率、光度参数、非视觉方面和人为因素,可行的室内照明评估框架可以对包括教育机构教室在内的室内空间提供的照明设计进行全面评估。本研究提出了一个全面的室内照明评估框架,在达成专家共识的德尔菲法和为每个标准分配权重的分析层次过程(AHP)的帮助下制定,其中有三个不同的标准或规则:能源效率和财务方面(EFFA),视觉和非视觉效果(VNVE),以及居住者的感知和舒适度(OPC)。每个提供的照明解决方案的最高综合得分为5分。该框架被应用于对印度西孟加拉邦一所高等教育机构的学习空间模型中几种基于白炽灯、荧光灯和发光二极管(LED)灯的候选照明解决方案的评估,一个模型演讲厅的相关色温(CCT)为4816 K的LED筒灯照明系统获得了最高的综合得分,为4.00分(满分为5.00分),最大的OPC(4.61分,满分为5.00分)。此外,基于led的照明系统比传统照明系统至少高出7.85%。引入的框架的新颖之处在于它强调在一个统一的评估模型中交织能源性能,财务成本,人体工程学和视觉舒适性,为室内照明设计和评估提供了实用和生产力的工具,特别是在缺乏正式的人体工程学照明设计和评估法规的地区和省份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel framework for the assessment of indoor lighting solutions and its application for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution considering energy efficiency and human factors
Indoor lighting planning, design, and commissioning should be performed with a panoptic view of financial incurrences, energy efficiency, photometric parameters, non-visual aspects, and human factors, and a practicable indoor lighting assessment framework can make thorough evaluations of proffered lighting designs of indoor spaces including classrooms of educational institutions. This study presents a comprehensive indoor lighting assessment framework, formulated with the assistance of the Delphi method of reaching expert consensus and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) of assigning weightage to each criterion, with three distinct criteria or rubrics: Energy Efficiency and Financial Aspects (EFFA), Visual and Non-Visual Effects (VNVE), and Occupants’ Perception and Comfort (OPC). A maximum composite score of 5 is awarded for each proffered lighting solution. This framework was applied for the evaluation of several candidate lighting solutions based on incandescent, fluorescent, and light-emitting diode (LED) lamps for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution in West Bengal, India, and the LED Downlight-based lighting system with a Correlated Colour Temperature (CCT) of 4816 K of a model lecture theatre received the highest composite score of 4.00 out of 5.00 and maximized OPC (4.61 out of 5.00). In addition, LED-based lighting systems outscored the conventional counterparts by at least 7.85 %. The novelty of the introduced framework lies in its emphasis on interlacing energy performance, financial incurrences, ergonomics, and visual comfort in a unified evaluation model, offering a pragmatic-cum-productivist tool for indoor lighting design and assessment, particularly in regions and provinces lacking formal ergonomic lighting design and evaluation regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信