黑人男性的亲密伴侣暴力受害和求助经历:整合并应用交叉性和霸权男性气质

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Meagan A. Stewart, Megan L. Haselschwerdt
{"title":"黑人男性的亲密伴侣暴力受害和求助经历:整合并应用交叉性和霸权男性气质","authors":"Meagan A. Stewart, Megan L. Haselschwerdt","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many theories have been applied to understanding varied experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, IPV‐related help‐seeking, and barriers to help‐seeking, including intersectionality theory to describe the influence of multiple systems of oppression on IPV victimization and help‐seeking. Although theorizing on IPV has historically focused on violence against women, more attention has been paid in recent years to men's IPV victimization and help‐seeking experiences. However, much of this literature is anti‐feminist and does not account for the impact of race and racism on men's experiences. Some researchers go as far as to blame feminism for the barriers that men face when seeking help and ignore the influence of White‐supremacist patriarchal systems on the men under study. The focus of this paper is Black men, as their IPV victimization experiences are rarely empirically accounted for, though they do experience IPV victimization. By applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinities to this sparse body of literature, we aim to illuminate the conundrums Black men face when victimized and making help‐seeking decisions in the context of patriarchy and White supremacy.","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black men's intimate partner violence victimization and help‐seeking experiences: Integrating and applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinity\",\"authors\":\"Meagan A. Stewart, Megan L. Haselschwerdt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jftr.12619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many theories have been applied to understanding varied experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, IPV‐related help‐seeking, and barriers to help‐seeking, including intersectionality theory to describe the influence of multiple systems of oppression on IPV victimization and help‐seeking. Although theorizing on IPV has historically focused on violence against women, more attention has been paid in recent years to men's IPV victimization and help‐seeking experiences. However, much of this literature is anti‐feminist and does not account for the impact of race and racism on men's experiences. Some researchers go as far as to blame feminism for the barriers that men face when seeking help and ignore the influence of White‐supremacist patriarchal systems on the men under study. The focus of this paper is Black men, as their IPV victimization experiences are rarely empirically accounted for, though they do experience IPV victimization. By applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinities to this sparse body of literature, we aim to illuminate the conundrums Black men face when victimized and making help‐seeking decisions in the context of patriarchy and White supremacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12619\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多理论已被用于理解亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)受害、IPV 相关求助以及求助障碍的不同经历,包括交叉性理论,以描述多重压迫系统对 IPV 受害和求助的影响。尽管有关 IPV 的理论研究历来侧重于针对女性的暴力行为,但近年来,男性的 IPV 受害和求助经历受到了更多关注。然而,这些文献大多是反女性主义的,没有考虑到种族和种族主义对男性经历的影响。一些研究人员甚至将男性在寻求帮助时面临的障碍归咎于女权主义,而忽视了白人至上的父权制度对被研究男性的影响。本文的重点是黑人男性,因为他们的 IPV 受害经历很少得到经验性的解释,尽管他们确实经历过 IPV 受害。通过将交叉性和霸权男性学应用到这一稀少的文献中,我们旨在阐明黑人男性在父权制和白人至上主义背景下受害和做出求助决定时所面临的难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Black men's intimate partner violence victimization and help‐seeking experiences: Integrating and applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinity
Many theories have been applied to understanding varied experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, IPV‐related help‐seeking, and barriers to help‐seeking, including intersectionality theory to describe the influence of multiple systems of oppression on IPV victimization and help‐seeking. Although theorizing on IPV has historically focused on violence against women, more attention has been paid in recent years to men's IPV victimization and help‐seeking experiences. However, much of this literature is anti‐feminist and does not account for the impact of race and racism on men's experiences. Some researchers go as far as to blame feminism for the barriers that men face when seeking help and ignore the influence of White‐supremacist patriarchal systems on the men under study. The focus of this paper is Black men, as their IPV victimization experiences are rarely empirically accounted for, though they do experience IPV victimization. By applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinities to this sparse body of literature, we aim to illuminate the conundrums Black men face when victimized and making help‐seeking decisions in the context of patriarchy and White supremacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信