快速和慢速错误:错误的命名延迟揭示了注意力控制和单词计划在快速图片命名中的相互作用。

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Christina Papoutsi, Elli N Tourtouri, Vitória Piai, Leonie F Lampe, Antje S Meyer
{"title":"快速和慢速错误:错误的命名延迟揭示了注意力控制和单词计划在快速图片命名中的相互作用。","authors":"Christina Papoutsi, Elli N Tourtouri, Vitória Piai, Leonie F Lampe, Antje S Meyer","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speakers sometimes produce lexical errors, such as saying \"salt\" instead of \"pepper.\" This study aimed to better understand the origin of lexical errors by assessing whether they arise from a hasty selection and premature decision to speak (<i>premature selection hypothesis</i>) or from momentary attentional disengagement from the task (<i>attentional lapse hypothesis</i>). We analyzed data from a speeded picture naming task (Lampe et al., 2023) and investigated whether lexical errors are produced as fast as target (i.e., correct) responses, thus arising from premature selection, or whether they are produced more slowly than target responses, thus arising from lapses of attention. Using ex-Gaussian analyses, we found that lexical errors were slower than targets in the tail, but not in the normal part of the response time distribution, with the tail effect primarily resulting from errors that were not coordinates, that is, members of the target's semantic category. Moreover, we compared the coordinate errors and target responses in terms of their word-intrinsic properties and found that they were overall more frequent, shorter, and acquired earlier than targets. Given the present findings, we conclude that coordinate errors occur due to a premature selection but in the context of intact attentional control, following the same lexical constraints as targets, while other errors, given the variability in their nature, may vary in their origin, with one potential source being lapses of attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast and slow errors: What naming latencies of errors reveal about the interplay of attentional control and word planning in speeded picture naming.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Papoutsi, Elli N Tourtouri, Vitória Piai, Leonie F Lampe, Antje S Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Speakers sometimes produce lexical errors, such as saying \\\"salt\\\" instead of \\\"pepper.\\\" This study aimed to better understand the origin of lexical errors by assessing whether they arise from a hasty selection and premature decision to speak (<i>premature selection hypothesis</i>) or from momentary attentional disengagement from the task (<i>attentional lapse hypothesis</i>). We analyzed data from a speeded picture naming task (Lampe et al., 2023) and investigated whether lexical errors are produced as fast as target (i.e., correct) responses, thus arising from premature selection, or whether they are produced more slowly than target responses, thus arising from lapses of attention. Using ex-Gaussian analyses, we found that lexical errors were slower than targets in the tail, but not in the normal part of the response time distribution, with the tail effect primarily resulting from errors that were not coordinates, that is, members of the target's semantic category. Moreover, we compared the coordinate errors and target responses in terms of their word-intrinsic properties and found that they were overall more frequent, shorter, and acquired earlier than targets. Given the present findings, we conclude that coordinate errors occur due to a premature selection but in the context of intact attentional control, following the same lexical constraints as targets, while other errors, given the variability in their nature, may vary in their origin, with one potential source being lapses of attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001472\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

说话者有时会犯词汇错误,比如把“pepper”说成“salt”。本研究旨在通过评估词汇错误是由草率选择和过早决定说话(过早选择假说)还是由任务的瞬间注意力脱离(注意力缺失假说)引起的,来更好地理解词汇错误的起源。我们分析了快速图片命名任务的数据(Lampe et al., 2023),并调查了词汇错误的产生是否与目标(即正确)反应一样快,从而导致过早选择,或者它们的产生是否比目标反应慢,从而导致注意力缺失。通过前高斯分析,我们发现词法错误在响应时间分布的尾部比目标慢,而不是在响应时间分布的正态部分,尾部效应主要是由非坐标的错误造成的,即目标语义类别的成员。此外,我们比较了坐标误差和目标反应的词内属性,发现它们总体上比目标更频繁、更短、更早获得。鉴于目前的研究结果,我们得出结论,坐标错误的发生是由于不成熟的选择,但在完整的注意力控制背景下,遵循与目标相同的词汇约束,而其他错误,鉴于其性质的可变性,可能在其起源上有所不同,其中一个潜在的来源是注意力缺失。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fast and slow errors: What naming latencies of errors reveal about the interplay of attentional control and word planning in speeded picture naming.

Speakers sometimes produce lexical errors, such as saying "salt" instead of "pepper." This study aimed to better understand the origin of lexical errors by assessing whether they arise from a hasty selection and premature decision to speak (premature selection hypothesis) or from momentary attentional disengagement from the task (attentional lapse hypothesis). We analyzed data from a speeded picture naming task (Lampe et al., 2023) and investigated whether lexical errors are produced as fast as target (i.e., correct) responses, thus arising from premature selection, or whether they are produced more slowly than target responses, thus arising from lapses of attention. Using ex-Gaussian analyses, we found that lexical errors were slower than targets in the tail, but not in the normal part of the response time distribution, with the tail effect primarily resulting from errors that were not coordinates, that is, members of the target's semantic category. Moreover, we compared the coordinate errors and target responses in terms of their word-intrinsic properties and found that they were overall more frequent, shorter, and acquired earlier than targets. Given the present findings, we conclude that coordinate errors occur due to a premature selection but in the context of intact attentional control, following the same lexical constraints as targets, while other errors, given the variability in their nature, may vary in their origin, with one potential source being lapses of attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信