家庭和社区服务提供者的区域供应和整合与制度化风险之间的关系:来自韩国的证据。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf007
Sunghun Yun, Hongsoo Kim
{"title":"家庭和社区服务提供者的区域供应和整合与制度化风险之间的关系:来自韩国的证据。","authors":"Sunghun Yun, Hongsoo Kim","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine whether the regional density of integrated home and community-based services (HCBS) providers affects long-term care (LTC) service utilization pattern and institutionalization risk in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This observational study utilized data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) on individuals aged 65 and older who became newly eligible for LTC insurance benefits in 2018. The final sample excluded individuals admitted to long-term care hospitals during the previous year or those living away from home, resulting in a total of 91,302 individuals included in the study. We analyzed the impact of regional HCBS and integrated care provider density on 4 outcomes: choice of HCBS over LTC facilities (LTCF) as first LTC service, intensity and comprehensiveness of HCBS use, and risk of institutionalization within a year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher regional densities of integrated care providers are associated with increased odds of using HCBS as the first LTC service (odds ratio 1.066, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01). Increased density was also associated with higher odds of using multiple HCBS (Odds Ratio 1.108, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01). Additionally, higher density of integrated care providers was associated to decreased risk of institutionalization into LTC facilities (hazard ratio 0.98, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The density integrated care providers significantly reduce institutionalization rates, by increasing the possibility of choosing HCBS over LTCF as their first LTC service and using a more comprehensive combination of HCBS services. Further investment in integrated care models may enhance the effectiveness of LTC systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 3","pages":"igaf007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Regional Supply and Integration of Home and Community-Based Service Providers and Risk of Institutionalization: Evidence From South Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Sunghun Yun, Hongsoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igaf007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine whether the regional density of integrated home and community-based services (HCBS) providers affects long-term care (LTC) service utilization pattern and institutionalization risk in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This observational study utilized data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) on individuals aged 65 and older who became newly eligible for LTC insurance benefits in 2018. The final sample excluded individuals admitted to long-term care hospitals during the previous year or those living away from home, resulting in a total of 91,302 individuals included in the study. We analyzed the impact of regional HCBS and integrated care provider density on 4 outcomes: choice of HCBS over LTC facilities (LTCF) as first LTC service, intensity and comprehensiveness of HCBS use, and risk of institutionalization within a year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher regional densities of integrated care providers are associated with increased odds of using HCBS as the first LTC service (odds ratio 1.066, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01). Increased density was also associated with higher odds of using multiple HCBS (Odds Ratio 1.108, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01). Additionally, higher density of integrated care providers was associated to decreased risk of institutionalization into LTC facilities (hazard ratio 0.98, model 1, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The density integrated care providers significantly reduce institutionalization rates, by increasing the possibility of choosing HCBS over LTCF as their first LTC service and using a more comprehensive combination of HCBS services. Further investment in integrated care models may enhance the effectiveness of LTC systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"igaf007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:研究韩国家庭和社区综合服务(HCBS)提供者的区域密度是否影响长期护理(LTC)服务的利用模式和机构化风险。研究设计和方法:本观察性研究利用了国民健康保险服务(NHIS)对2018年新获得长期医疗保险福利资格的65岁及以上个人的数据。最后的样本排除了前一年住过长期护理医院的人或住在离家很远的人,总共有91,302人被纳入研究。我们分析了区域HCBS和综合护理提供者密度对4个结果的影响:选择HCBS而不是LTCF作为第一个LTC服务,HCBS使用的强度和全面性,以及一年内机构化的风险。结果:综合护理提供者的区域密度越高,使用HCBS作为第一种LTC服务的几率越高(优势比1.066,模型1,p p p p)。讨论和意义:通过增加选择HCBS而不是LTCF作为第一种LTC服务的可能性,以及使用更全面的HCBS服务组合,密度越高的综合护理提供者显著降低了制度化率。对综合护理模式的进一步投资可能会提高长期医疗服务系统的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations Between Regional Supply and Integration of Home and Community-Based Service Providers and Risk of Institutionalization: Evidence From South Korea.

Background and objectives: To examine whether the regional density of integrated home and community-based services (HCBS) providers affects long-term care (LTC) service utilization pattern and institutionalization risk in South Korea.

Research design and methods: This observational study utilized data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) on individuals aged 65 and older who became newly eligible for LTC insurance benefits in 2018. The final sample excluded individuals admitted to long-term care hospitals during the previous year or those living away from home, resulting in a total of 91,302 individuals included in the study. We analyzed the impact of regional HCBS and integrated care provider density on 4 outcomes: choice of HCBS over LTC facilities (LTCF) as first LTC service, intensity and comprehensiveness of HCBS use, and risk of institutionalization within a year.

Results: Higher regional densities of integrated care providers are associated with increased odds of using HCBS as the first LTC service (odds ratio 1.066, model 1, p < .01). Increased density was also associated with higher odds of using multiple HCBS (Odds Ratio 1.108, model 1, p < .01). Additionally, higher density of integrated care providers was associated to decreased risk of institutionalization into LTC facilities (hazard ratio 0.98, model 1, p < .01).

Discussion and implications: The density integrated care providers significantly reduce institutionalization rates, by increasing the possibility of choosing HCBS over LTCF as their first LTC service and using a more comprehensive combination of HCBS services. Further investment in integrated care models may enhance the effectiveness of LTC systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信