{"title":"社会网络在素食采用和维持中的作用:来自荷兰北部的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Kristina Thompson , Yinjie Zhu , Spencer Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wider adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets would be mutually beneficial for human and environmental health. Social networks have been identified as a factor that would support this transition. While social networks' role in vegetarian diet adoption has been studied, their role in vegetarian diet maintenance over time has received much less attention. To address this gap, we investigated the extent to which having vegetarian close ties (family members and/or partners) was related to participants' likelihood of eating vegetarian. Data were derived from Lifelines, a large cohort study from the northern Netherlands (n = 60,639). Two assessments an average of 3.9 years apart were used. We studied the interaction of close ties' diet trajectories (either vegetarian or omnivore) at baseline and follow-up, and their relationship to participants' own diet trajectories at baseline and follow-up. Mixed multinomial logistic regression was used to account for clustering among families. Participants closely mirrored their close ties' diet trajectories. Having close ties who were vegetarians at baseline and follow-up was associated with the highest probability of the participants themselves also eating vegetarian at both assessments (Pr = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.08). In contrast, participants with no vegetarian close ties at baseline and follow-up were the least likely to be vegetarians themselves at both assessments (Pr = 0.02, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.02). Partners particularly had a strong influence on participants’ diet trajectories compared to other family members. It appears that the closer the tie was, the more closely diet trajectories paralleled each another. More broadly, leveraging social networks could be effective in encouraging more widespread adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107951"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social networks’ role in vegetarian diet adoption and maintenance: A prospective study from the northern Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Thompson , Yinjie Zhu , Spencer Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wider adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets would be mutually beneficial for human and environmental health. Social networks have been identified as a factor that would support this transition. While social networks' role in vegetarian diet adoption has been studied, their role in vegetarian diet maintenance over time has received much less attention. To address this gap, we investigated the extent to which having vegetarian close ties (family members and/or partners) was related to participants' likelihood of eating vegetarian. Data were derived from Lifelines, a large cohort study from the northern Netherlands (n = 60,639). Two assessments an average of 3.9 years apart were used. We studied the interaction of close ties' diet trajectories (either vegetarian or omnivore) at baseline and follow-up, and their relationship to participants' own diet trajectories at baseline and follow-up. Mixed multinomial logistic regression was used to account for clustering among families. Participants closely mirrored their close ties' diet trajectories. Having close ties who were vegetarians at baseline and follow-up was associated with the highest probability of the participants themselves also eating vegetarian at both assessments (Pr = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.08). In contrast, participants with no vegetarian close ties at baseline and follow-up were the least likely to be vegetarians themselves at both assessments (Pr = 0.02, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.02). Partners particularly had a strong influence on participants’ diet trajectories compared to other family members. It appears that the closer the tie was, the more closely diet trajectories paralleled each another. More broadly, leveraging social networks could be effective in encouraging more widespread adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social networks’ role in vegetarian diet adoption and maintenance: A prospective study from the northern Netherlands
Wider adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets would be mutually beneficial for human and environmental health. Social networks have been identified as a factor that would support this transition. While social networks' role in vegetarian diet adoption has been studied, their role in vegetarian diet maintenance over time has received much less attention. To address this gap, we investigated the extent to which having vegetarian close ties (family members and/or partners) was related to participants' likelihood of eating vegetarian. Data were derived from Lifelines, a large cohort study from the northern Netherlands (n = 60,639). Two assessments an average of 3.9 years apart were used. We studied the interaction of close ties' diet trajectories (either vegetarian or omnivore) at baseline and follow-up, and their relationship to participants' own diet trajectories at baseline and follow-up. Mixed multinomial logistic regression was used to account for clustering among families. Participants closely mirrored their close ties' diet trajectories. Having close ties who were vegetarians at baseline and follow-up was associated with the highest probability of the participants themselves also eating vegetarian at both assessments (Pr = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.08). In contrast, participants with no vegetarian close ties at baseline and follow-up were the least likely to be vegetarians themselves at both assessments (Pr = 0.02, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.02). Partners particularly had a strong influence on participants’ diet trajectories compared to other family members. It appears that the closer the tie was, the more closely diet trajectories paralleled each another. More broadly, leveraging social networks could be effective in encouraging more widespread adoption and maintenance of vegetarian diets.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.