针对锂盐治疗患者的临床药学活动。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Candice Niot, Elodie Cuvelier, Arnaud Leroy, Guillaume Vaiva, Michel Maron, Oliver Cottencin, Pascal Odou, Ali Amad, Bertrand Décaudin
{"title":"针对锂盐治疗患者的临床药学活动。","authors":"Candice Niot, Elodie Cuvelier, Arnaud Leroy, Guillaume Vaiva, Michel Maron, Oliver Cottencin, Pascal Odou, Ali Amad, Bertrand Décaudin","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2024.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medication compliance in lithium-treated patients is poor (43-46%) and may be responsible for relapse or toxicity. Improving understanding of treatment principles leads to increased medication adherence. To do this, targeted and personalised pharmaceutical interviews on lithium were developed and implemented by a clinical pharmacy team in adult psychiatric departments of the Lille university hospital center. The primary aim of this work was to assess medication adherence with lithium, patients' understanding of the drug and of potential adverse effects. A secondary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of these pharmaceutical interviews in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation of self-assessment questionnaires measuring medication adherence (Medication Adherence Rating Scale) as well as knowledge of lithium and risk of exposure to toxic effects (Lithium Knowledge Test) of patients. Conducting targeted pharmaceutical interviews about lithium, and recording of time spent, satisfaction of medical teams and difficulties encountered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were included in the 6-month study. Every patient benefited from a personalized pharmaceutical interview by a pharmacy intern focused on lithium during his hospitalization. Lithium adherence, patient knowledge and risk exposure to lithium toxicity was 5.5±0.9 (target ≥8), 8.9±0.9 (target >6) and 4.0±0.5 (target <4). The median time required for these new activities was 95minutes per patient. Medical satisfaction was observed in 70% to 100% of cases depending on the criterion assessed. The lack of pharmaceutical time and communication difficulties were the main obstacles encountered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication compliance in patients treated with lithium is poor as described in the literature. To improve this and to optimise drug management, patients have benefited from targeted and personalised pharmaceutical interviews. The satisfaction of patients and the medical team made it possible to sustain these new pharmaceutical activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical pharmacy activities specific to patients treated with lithium.\",\"authors\":\"Candice Niot, Elodie Cuvelier, Arnaud Leroy, Guillaume Vaiva, Michel Maron, Oliver Cottencin, Pascal Odou, Ali Amad, Bertrand Décaudin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.encep.2024.11.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medication compliance in lithium-treated patients is poor (43-46%) and may be responsible for relapse or toxicity. Improving understanding of treatment principles leads to increased medication adherence. To do this, targeted and personalised pharmaceutical interviews on lithium were developed and implemented by a clinical pharmacy team in adult psychiatric departments of the Lille university hospital center. The primary aim of this work was to assess medication adherence with lithium, patients' understanding of the drug and of potential adverse effects. A secondary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of these pharmaceutical interviews in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation of self-assessment questionnaires measuring medication adherence (Medication Adherence Rating Scale) as well as knowledge of lithium and risk of exposure to toxic effects (Lithium Knowledge Test) of patients. Conducting targeted pharmaceutical interviews about lithium, and recording of time spent, satisfaction of medical teams and difficulties encountered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were included in the 6-month study. Every patient benefited from a personalized pharmaceutical interview by a pharmacy intern focused on lithium during his hospitalization. Lithium adherence, patient knowledge and risk exposure to lithium toxicity was 5.5±0.9 (target ≥8), 8.9±0.9 (target >6) and 4.0±0.5 (target <4). The median time required for these new activities was 95minutes per patient. Medical satisfaction was observed in 70% to 100% of cases depending on the criterion assessed. The lack of pharmaceutical time and communication difficulties were the main obstacles encountered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication compliance in patients treated with lithium is poor as described in the literature. To improve this and to optimise drug management, patients have benefited from targeted and personalised pharmaceutical interviews. The satisfaction of patients and the medical team made it possible to sustain these new pharmaceutical activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2024.11.019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2024.11.019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical pharmacy activities specific to patients treated with lithium.

Objectives: Medication compliance in lithium-treated patients is poor (43-46%) and may be responsible for relapse or toxicity. Improving understanding of treatment principles leads to increased medication adherence. To do this, targeted and personalised pharmaceutical interviews on lithium were developed and implemented by a clinical pharmacy team in adult psychiatric departments of the Lille university hospital center. The primary aim of this work was to assess medication adherence with lithium, patients' understanding of the drug and of potential adverse effects. A secondary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of these pharmaceutical interviews in practice.

Methods: Implementation of self-assessment questionnaires measuring medication adherence (Medication Adherence Rating Scale) as well as knowledge of lithium and risk of exposure to toxic effects (Lithium Knowledge Test) of patients. Conducting targeted pharmaceutical interviews about lithium, and recording of time spent, satisfaction of medical teams and difficulties encountered.

Results: Twenty patients were included in the 6-month study. Every patient benefited from a personalized pharmaceutical interview by a pharmacy intern focused on lithium during his hospitalization. Lithium adherence, patient knowledge and risk exposure to lithium toxicity was 5.5±0.9 (target ≥8), 8.9±0.9 (target >6) and 4.0±0.5 (target <4). The median time required for these new activities was 95minutes per patient. Medical satisfaction was observed in 70% to 100% of cases depending on the criterion assessed. The lack of pharmaceutical time and communication difficulties were the main obstacles encountered.

Conclusion: Medication compliance in patients treated with lithium is poor as described in the literature. To improve this and to optimise drug management, patients have benefited from targeted and personalised pharmaceutical interviews. The satisfaction of patients and the medical team made it possible to sustain these new pharmaceutical activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Une revue française de renommée internationale. - Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient. - Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises. - Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale. - Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.). - Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue. La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau. - Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques : - des éditoriaux de médecins référents, - une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales, - des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances, - des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique, - des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question. - L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信