住宅处理中的反控制和相关挑战。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s40614-025-00437-5
John O'Neill, Joseph Tacosik
{"title":"住宅处理中的反控制和相关挑战。","authors":"John O'Neill, Joseph Tacosik","doi":"10.1007/s40614-025-00437-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>B. F. Skinner described countercontrol as a response to socially mediated aversive consequences that is primarily reinforced through negative reinforcement (i.e., removal or weakening of aversive stimuli) and may be strengthened further through positive reinforcement (e.g., peer approval or other attention). Skinner considered the empirical analysis of the phenomenon to be essential for a complete understanding of human behavior and recognized countercontrol as a necessary but complex aspect of treatment in vulnerable populations. Residential treatment settings are inherently restrictive, potentially aversive to consumers, and thus may evoke countercontrol by clients, especially when assent/consent is withheld or provided by someone other than the individual receiving treatment (e.g., guardian, conservator, or substituted judgement). We identify treatment challenges presented by countercontrol and considerations associated with: (1) setting events; (2) conditioned aversive stimuli; (3) topographies and other dimensions of behavior; (4) competing contingencies of reinforcement; and (5) functional behavior assessments. We conclude with a call to action for the long overdue experimental analysis of countercontrol in residential treatment settings and society at large.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"48 1","pages":"145-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Countercontrol and Associated Challenges in Residential Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"John O'Neill, Joseph Tacosik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40614-025-00437-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>B. F. Skinner described countercontrol as a response to socially mediated aversive consequences that is primarily reinforced through negative reinforcement (i.e., removal or weakening of aversive stimuli) and may be strengthened further through positive reinforcement (e.g., peer approval or other attention). Skinner considered the empirical analysis of the phenomenon to be essential for a complete understanding of human behavior and recognized countercontrol as a necessary but complex aspect of treatment in vulnerable populations. Residential treatment settings are inherently restrictive, potentially aversive to consumers, and thus may evoke countercontrol by clients, especially when assent/consent is withheld or provided by someone other than the individual receiving treatment (e.g., guardian, conservator, or substituted judgement). We identify treatment challenges presented by countercontrol and considerations associated with: (1) setting events; (2) conditioned aversive stimuli; (3) topographies and other dimensions of behavior; (4) competing contingencies of reinforcement; and (5) functional behavior assessments. We conclude with a call to action for the long overdue experimental analysis of countercontrol in residential treatment settings and society at large.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Behavior Science\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"145-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Behavior Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-025-00437-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-025-00437-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

B. F. Skinner将反控制描述为对社会介导的厌恶后果的反应,这种反应主要通过负强化(即厌恶刺激的移除或减弱)得到加强,并可能通过正强化(例如同伴认可或其他关注)进一步得到加强。斯金纳认为,对这种现象的实证分析对于全面理解人类行为至关重要,并认为反控制是治疗弱势群体的必要但复杂的方面。住院治疗环境具有固有的限制性,可能会引起消费者的反感,因此可能会引起客户的反控制,特别是当同意/同意被拒绝或由接受治疗的个人以外的其他人提供时(例如,监护人、保管人或替代判决)。我们确定了反控制带来的治疗挑战以及与以下因素相关的考虑:(1)设定事件;(2)条件厌恶刺激;(三)地形和其他行为维度;(4)强化的竞争权变;(5)功能行为评价。最后,我们呼吁采取行动,对住宅治疗环境和整个社会的反控制进行长期逾期的实验分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Countercontrol and Associated Challenges in Residential Treatment.

B. F. Skinner described countercontrol as a response to socially mediated aversive consequences that is primarily reinforced through negative reinforcement (i.e., removal or weakening of aversive stimuli) and may be strengthened further through positive reinforcement (e.g., peer approval or other attention). Skinner considered the empirical analysis of the phenomenon to be essential for a complete understanding of human behavior and recognized countercontrol as a necessary but complex aspect of treatment in vulnerable populations. Residential treatment settings are inherently restrictive, potentially aversive to consumers, and thus may evoke countercontrol by clients, especially when assent/consent is withheld or provided by someone other than the individual receiving treatment (e.g., guardian, conservator, or substituted judgement). We identify treatment challenges presented by countercontrol and considerations associated with: (1) setting events; (2) conditioned aversive stimuli; (3) topographies and other dimensions of behavior; (4) competing contingencies of reinforcement; and (5) functional behavior assessments. We conclude with a call to action for the long overdue experimental analysis of countercontrol in residential treatment settings and society at large.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Perspectives on Behavior Science PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Behavior Science is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International. It is published quarterly, and in addition to its articles on theoretical, experimental, and applied topics in behavior analysis, this journal also includes literature reviews, re-interpretations of published data, and articles on behaviorism as a philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信