Noah V. Peters , Lucia A. Reisch , on behalf of the PEN-Consortium
{"title":"可持续城市交通计划实施的驱动因素和障碍:哥本哈根的经验教训","authors":"Noah V. Peters , Lucia A. Reisch , on behalf of the PEN-Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2013, the European Commission introduced Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to promote healthy and sustainable cities. Because policymakers and researchers seek to understand the drivers of and barriers to SUMP implementation, we assessed the mobility plan of a frontrunner in sustainability: Copenhagen, Denmark. Informed by a review of policy documents, we conducted semi-structured interviews with experts on Copenhagen’s SUMP and analysed the data using thematic analysis. We find that Copenhagen’s SUMP implementation follows city-specific rather than European guidelines and is embedded in opposing institutional and political frameworks. The city’s established commitment to sustainability and urban liveability provides fertile ground for SUMP implementation, but motorised traffic remains dominant. In terms of evaluation, the SUMP defines and follows up on various implementation goals. Nonetheless, evaluation methods, policy lessons and status-group representation remain somewhat selective. Overall, the Copenhagen case shows that cities’ unique characteristics influence how policymakers embrace generic planning frameworks like SUMPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers of and barriers to Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan implementation: Lessons from Copenhagen\",\"authors\":\"Noah V. Peters , Lucia A. Reisch , on behalf of the PEN-Consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In 2013, the European Commission introduced Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to promote healthy and sustainable cities. Because policymakers and researchers seek to understand the drivers of and barriers to SUMP implementation, we assessed the mobility plan of a frontrunner in sustainability: Copenhagen, Denmark. Informed by a review of policy documents, we conducted semi-structured interviews with experts on Copenhagen’s SUMP and analysed the data using thematic analysis. We find that Copenhagen’s SUMP implementation follows city-specific rather than European guidelines and is embedded in opposing institutional and political frameworks. The city’s established commitment to sustainability and urban liveability provides fertile ground for SUMP implementation, but motorised traffic remains dominant. In terms of evaluation, the SUMP defines and follows up on various implementation goals. Nonetheless, evaluation methods, policy lessons and status-group representation remain somewhat selective. Overall, the Copenhagen case shows that cities’ unique characteristics influence how policymakers embrace generic planning frameworks like SUMPs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drivers of and barriers to Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan implementation: Lessons from Copenhagen
In 2013, the European Commission introduced Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to promote healthy and sustainable cities. Because policymakers and researchers seek to understand the drivers of and barriers to SUMP implementation, we assessed the mobility plan of a frontrunner in sustainability: Copenhagen, Denmark. Informed by a review of policy documents, we conducted semi-structured interviews with experts on Copenhagen’s SUMP and analysed the data using thematic analysis. We find that Copenhagen’s SUMP implementation follows city-specific rather than European guidelines and is embedded in opposing institutional and political frameworks. The city’s established commitment to sustainability and urban liveability provides fertile ground for SUMP implementation, but motorised traffic remains dominant. In terms of evaluation, the SUMP defines and follows up on various implementation goals. Nonetheless, evaluation methods, policy lessons and status-group representation remain somewhat selective. Overall, the Copenhagen case shows that cities’ unique characteristics influence how policymakers embrace generic planning frameworks like SUMPs.