共同努力:临床医生的经验,共同努力,以获得最好的结果在产妇护理。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Vanessa Watkins, Cate Nagle, Bridie Kent, Maryann Street, Alison M Hutchinson
{"title":"共同努力:临床医生的经验,共同努力,以获得最好的结果在产妇护理。","authors":"Vanessa Watkins, Cate Nagle, Bridie Kent, Maryann Street, Alison M Hutchinson","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2469308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is crucial for the safe provision of maternity care. However, IPC is poorly understood in the maternity care context, and the role of the childbearing woman within this collaboration remains unclear. The Labouring Together study used a mixed method, multi-site case study design to explore IPC and decision-making with women from the perspectives of maternity health care professionals (HCP). Case studies included a range of maternity models of care in metropolitan and regional settings in Australia. Cross-sectional surveys were used to investigate organizational context and HCPs' attitudes toward collaboration. Experiences and perceptions of collaboration and decision-making were explored using in-depth semi-structured interviews. A conceptual framework <i>\"Experience of collaboration: Working together to get the best outcomes\"</i> was formed from the interview findings, with major themes of \"<i>Organisation of care: working together for the organisation\"</i> and <i>\"Partnering in care: working together with women.\"</i> Individual-level behaviors were employed by HCP to transcend interprofessional tensions relating to IPC. Entrenched organizational and policy-level barriers to effective IPC were identified; and whilst participants agreed that women should have autonomy with decision-making, most identified barriers at multiple levels to achieving this ideal.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labouring Together: Clinicians' experiences of working together to get the best outcomes in maternity care.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Watkins, Cate Nagle, Bridie Kent, Maryann Street, Alison M Hutchinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13561820.2025.2469308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is crucial for the safe provision of maternity care. However, IPC is poorly understood in the maternity care context, and the role of the childbearing woman within this collaboration remains unclear. The Labouring Together study used a mixed method, multi-site case study design to explore IPC and decision-making with women from the perspectives of maternity health care professionals (HCP). Case studies included a range of maternity models of care in metropolitan and regional settings in Australia. Cross-sectional surveys were used to investigate organizational context and HCPs' attitudes toward collaboration. Experiences and perceptions of collaboration and decision-making were explored using in-depth semi-structured interviews. A conceptual framework <i>\\\"Experience of collaboration: Working together to get the best outcomes\\\"</i> was formed from the interview findings, with major themes of \\\"<i>Organisation of care: working together for the organisation\\\"</i> and <i>\\\"Partnering in care: working together with women.\\\"</i> Individual-level behaviors were employed by HCP to transcend interprofessional tensions relating to IPC. Entrenched organizational and policy-level barriers to effective IPC were identified; and whilst participants agreed that women should have autonomy with decision-making, most identified barriers at multiple levels to achieving this ideal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2469308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2469308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨专业合作(IPC)对于安全提供孕产妇保健至关重要。然而,IPC在产妇护理方面的理解很少,育龄妇女在这种合作中的作用仍然不清楚。“一起劳动”研究采用混合方法、多地点案例研究设计,从孕产妇保健专业人员(HCP)的角度探讨IPC和妇女的决策。案例研究包括澳大利亚大都市和区域环境中的一系列产妇护理模式。横断面调查被用来调查组织背景和医护人员对合作的态度。通过深入的半结构化访谈,探讨了合作和决策的经验和看法。根据访谈结果,形成了一个概念框架“合作的经验:共同努力获得最佳结果”,其主题是“护理组织:共同为组织工作”和“护理合作:与妇女一起工作”。HCP采用个人层面的行为来超越与IPC相关的专业间紧张关系。确定了阻碍有效IPC的根深蒂固的组织和政策层面障碍;虽然与会者同意女性应该在决策方面拥有自主权,但大多数人都指出了实现这一理想的多重障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labouring Together: Clinicians' experiences of working together to get the best outcomes in maternity care.

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is crucial for the safe provision of maternity care. However, IPC is poorly understood in the maternity care context, and the role of the childbearing woman within this collaboration remains unclear. The Labouring Together study used a mixed method, multi-site case study design to explore IPC and decision-making with women from the perspectives of maternity health care professionals (HCP). Case studies included a range of maternity models of care in metropolitan and regional settings in Australia. Cross-sectional surveys were used to investigate organizational context and HCPs' attitudes toward collaboration. Experiences and perceptions of collaboration and decision-making were explored using in-depth semi-structured interviews. A conceptual framework "Experience of collaboration: Working together to get the best outcomes" was formed from the interview findings, with major themes of "Organisation of care: working together for the organisation" and "Partnering in care: working together with women." Individual-level behaviors were employed by HCP to transcend interprofessional tensions relating to IPC. Entrenched organizational and policy-level barriers to effective IPC were identified; and whilst participants agreed that women should have autonomy with decision-making, most identified barriers at multiple levels to achieving this ideal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信