Herni Susanti, Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Ni Luh Dwi Indrayani, Tutu April Ariani, Hui-Yu Tsai, Budi Anna Keliat, Mei-Feng Lin
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间丧亲者配偶的悲伤、依恋和心理健康的社会支持","authors":"Herni Susanti, Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Ni Luh Dwi Indrayani, Tutu April Ariani, Hui-Yu Tsai, Budi Anna Keliat, Mei-Feng Lin","doi":"10.1111/famp.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explored the associations of grief support between social support for grief and pandemic grief symptoms, attachment, and mental health through accounting for sociodemographic factors among bereaved spouses widowed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. From September 10 to November 23, 2020, a cross-sectional mobile online survey was conducted, involving 92 participants with a mean age of 44.21 years. The sample was predominantly Islamic (91%) and female (88.8%), with an average marriage duration of 18.73 years. Participants completed assessments, including the Grief Support Assessment Scale, Brief Symptom Rating Scale-5, Pandemic Grief Scale, Revised Adult Attachment Scale, and Couple Interaction Scale for Marital Support. Results showed that the extent to which grief support was received (<i>β</i> = −0.36, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and that bereaved spouses were satisfied with (<i>β</i> = −0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.03) grief support were negatively correlated with pandemic grief. Age, education, and attachment directly influenced mental health. A k-means cluster analysis identified a younger cluster (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.76 ± 4.63) experiencing greater mental health difficulties (14.84 ± 3.9), pandemic grief (7.23 ± 3.06), and attachment needs (51.80 ± 8.06). The findings highlight that the grief support needed was higher than the support received and the satisfaction with that support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, participants were dissatisfied with the higher demand for resources from governmental and nongovernmental organizations. The study emphasizes the importance of accessible, high-quality grief support services that are culturally and religiously sensitive, especially in diverse contexts like Indonesia.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Support for Grief, Attachment, and Mental Health Among Bereaved Spouses During COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Herni Susanti, Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Ni Luh Dwi Indrayani, Tutu April Ariani, Hui-Yu Tsai, Budi Anna Keliat, Mei-Feng Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/famp.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study explored the associations of grief support between social support for grief and pandemic grief symptoms, attachment, and mental health through accounting for sociodemographic factors among bereaved spouses widowed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. From September 10 to November 23, 2020, a cross-sectional mobile online survey was conducted, involving 92 participants with a mean age of 44.21 years. The sample was predominantly Islamic (91%) and female (88.8%), with an average marriage duration of 18.73 years. Participants completed assessments, including the Grief Support Assessment Scale, Brief Symptom Rating Scale-5, Pandemic Grief Scale, Revised Adult Attachment Scale, and Couple Interaction Scale for Marital Support. Results showed that the extent to which grief support was received (<i>β</i> = −0.36, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and that bereaved spouses were satisfied with (<i>β</i> = −0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.03) grief support were negatively correlated with pandemic grief. Age, education, and attachment directly influenced mental health. A k-means cluster analysis identified a younger cluster (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.76 ± 4.63) experiencing greater mental health difficulties (14.84 ± 3.9), pandemic grief (7.23 ± 3.06), and attachment needs (51.80 ± 8.06). The findings highlight that the grief support needed was higher than the support received and the satisfaction with that support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, participants were dissatisfied with the higher demand for resources from governmental and nongovernmental organizations. The study emphasizes the importance of accessible, high-quality grief support services that are culturally and religiously sensitive, especially in diverse contexts like Indonesia.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Process\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究通过考虑COVID-19大流行导致的丧偶配偶的社会人口因素,探讨了悲伤支持与大流行悲伤症状、依恋和心理健康之间的悲伤社会支持之间的关联。2020年9月10日至11月23日,进行横断面移动在线调查,92名参与者,平均年龄44.21岁。样本主要是伊斯兰教徒(91%)和女性(88.8%),平均婚姻持续时间为18.73年。参与者完成了包括悲伤支持评估量表、简短症状评定量表-5、大流行悲伤量表、修订成人依恋量表和夫妻互动婚姻支持量表。结果显示,患者获得悲伤支持的程度(β = - 0.36, p = 0.03)和丧失配偶对悲伤支持的满意度(β = - 0.29, p = 0.03)与流行病悲伤呈负相关。年龄、受教育程度和依恋关系直接影响心理健康。k-means聚类分析发现,较年轻的聚类(Mage = 34.76±4.63)有更大的心理健康困难(14.84±3.9)、大流行悲伤(7.23±3.06)和依恋需求(51.80±8.06)。调查结果强调,在COVID-19大流行期间,所需的悲伤支持高于所获得的支持和对这种支持的满意度。此外,与会者对政府和非政府组织对资源的更高需求表示不满。该研究强调了无障碍、高质量的悲伤支持服务的重要性,这些服务对文化和宗教敏感,特别是在印度尼西亚这样的不同背景下。
Social Support for Grief, Attachment, and Mental Health Among Bereaved Spouses During COVID-19 Pandemic
This study explored the associations of grief support between social support for grief and pandemic grief symptoms, attachment, and mental health through accounting for sociodemographic factors among bereaved spouses widowed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. From September 10 to November 23, 2020, a cross-sectional mobile online survey was conducted, involving 92 participants with a mean age of 44.21 years. The sample was predominantly Islamic (91%) and female (88.8%), with an average marriage duration of 18.73 years. Participants completed assessments, including the Grief Support Assessment Scale, Brief Symptom Rating Scale-5, Pandemic Grief Scale, Revised Adult Attachment Scale, and Couple Interaction Scale for Marital Support. Results showed that the extent to which grief support was received (β = −0.36, p = 0.03) and that bereaved spouses were satisfied with (β = −0.29, p = 0.03) grief support were negatively correlated with pandemic grief. Age, education, and attachment directly influenced mental health. A k-means cluster analysis identified a younger cluster (Mage = 34.76 ± 4.63) experiencing greater mental health difficulties (14.84 ± 3.9), pandemic grief (7.23 ± 3.06), and attachment needs (51.80 ± 8.06). The findings highlight that the grief support needed was higher than the support received and the satisfaction with that support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, participants were dissatisfied with the higher demand for resources from governmental and nongovernmental organizations. The study emphasizes the importance of accessible, high-quality grief support services that are culturally and religiously sensitive, especially in diverse contexts like Indonesia.
期刊介绍:
Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.