奶牛饲料管理对土壤碳变化的影响及净零核算。

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Joshua D. Gamble, Jonathan Alexander
{"title":"奶牛饲料管理对土壤碳变化的影响及净零核算。","authors":"Joshua D. Gamble,&nbsp;Jonathan Alexander","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The US dairy industry has pledged to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050, but reliance on corn (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) silage as a primary forage source undermines progress toward this goal. Soils managed for corn silage production are a substantial source of carbon (C) emissions to the atmosphere, with soil C losses ranging from 3.7 to 7.0 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (13.5 to 25.6 Mg CO<sub>2</sub> ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) reported in the literature. However, biogenic emissions from soil C loss are not typically represented within C footprints or life cycle inventories. Using an example dairy farm, we demonstrate that including emissions associated with soil C losses under dairy forage production can increase the C footprint of milk nearly 2-fold. We suggest that this approach represents a more accurate estimate of the emissions impact of milk production, and that gains in the GHG efficiency of milk have come, in part, at the expense of soil C, where forage rotations are predominated by silage corn. The C balance of forage production systems can likely be improved with advanced manure management technologies and application strategies that return more manurial C to the soil while minimizing N and P loading. However, we argue that more extensive changes to forage cropping systems will also be required. Expanding the role of perennials and winter annual crops in forage rotations; breeding forages with greater yield, persistence, and deeper more extensive root systems; and additional creative solutions to retain more plant-derived C in soils are necessary to balance soil C budgets and achieve net zero emissions targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"108 5","pages":"Pages 4479-4484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspective: Impacts of dairy forage management on soil carbon change and net zero accounting\",\"authors\":\"Joshua D. Gamble,&nbsp;Jonathan Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2024-25796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The US dairy industry has pledged to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050, but reliance on corn (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) silage as a primary forage source undermines progress toward this goal. Soils managed for corn silage production are a substantial source of carbon (C) emissions to the atmosphere, with soil C losses ranging from 3.7 to 7.0 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (13.5 to 25.6 Mg CO<sub>2</sub> ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) reported in the literature. However, biogenic emissions from soil C loss are not typically represented within C footprints or life cycle inventories. Using an example dairy farm, we demonstrate that including emissions associated with soil C losses under dairy forage production can increase the C footprint of milk nearly 2-fold. We suggest that this approach represents a more accurate estimate of the emissions impact of milk production, and that gains in the GHG efficiency of milk have come, in part, at the expense of soil C, where forage rotations are predominated by silage corn. The C balance of forage production systems can likely be improved with advanced manure management technologies and application strategies that return more manurial C to the soil while minimizing N and P loading. However, we argue that more extensive changes to forage cropping systems will also be required. Expanding the role of perennials and winter annual crops in forage rotations; breeding forages with greater yield, persistence, and deeper more extensive root systems; and additional creative solutions to retain more plant-derived C in soils are necessary to balance soil C budgets and achieve net zero emissions targets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":\"108 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 4479-4484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030225001201\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030225001201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国乳制品行业承诺到2050年实现温室气体净零排放(GHG),但依赖玉米青贮作为主要饲料来源阻碍了这一目标的进展。玉米青贮生产管理的土壤是向大气排放碳(C)的重要来源,文献报道的土壤C损失范围为3.7至7.0 Mg C /年(13.5至25.6 Mg CO2 /年)。然而,土壤碳流失的生物源排放通常不包括在碳足迹或生命周期清单中。以一个奶牛场为例,我们证明,在奶牛饲料生产过程中,包括与土壤碳损失相关的排放,可以使牛奶的碳足迹增加近两倍。我们认为,这种方法代表了对牛奶生产的排放影响的更准确的估计,并且牛奶的温室气体效率的提高在一定程度上是以牺牲土壤为代价的——在这里,饲料轮作主要是青贮玉米。采用先进的粪肥管理技术和施用策略,在减少氮和磷负荷的同时,向土壤返还更多的粪肥碳,可能会改善牧草生产系统的碳平衡。然而,我们认为还需要对饲料种植系统进行更广泛的改变。扩大多年生和冬季一年生作物在牧草轮作中的作用;培育产量更高、持久性更强、根系更深、更广的牧草;为了平衡土壤碳预算和实现净零排放目标,需要额外的创造性解决方案来保留土壤中更多的植物源碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspective: Impacts of dairy forage management on soil carbon change and net zero accounting
The US dairy industry has pledged to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050, but reliance on corn (Zea mays L.) silage as a primary forage source undermines progress toward this goal. Soils managed for corn silage production are a substantial source of carbon (C) emissions to the atmosphere, with soil C losses ranging from 3.7 to 7.0 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 (13.5 to 25.6 Mg CO2 ha−1 yr−1) reported in the literature. However, biogenic emissions from soil C loss are not typically represented within C footprints or life cycle inventories. Using an example dairy farm, we demonstrate that including emissions associated with soil C losses under dairy forage production can increase the C footprint of milk nearly 2-fold. We suggest that this approach represents a more accurate estimate of the emissions impact of milk production, and that gains in the GHG efficiency of milk have come, in part, at the expense of soil C, where forage rotations are predominated by silage corn. The C balance of forage production systems can likely be improved with advanced manure management technologies and application strategies that return more manurial C to the soil while minimizing N and P loading. However, we argue that more extensive changes to forage cropping systems will also be required. Expanding the role of perennials and winter annual crops in forage rotations; breeding forages with greater yield, persistence, and deeper more extensive root systems; and additional creative solutions to retain more plant-derived C in soils are necessary to balance soil C budgets and achieve net zero emissions targets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信