在小农目标价值链中权衡包容性、价值和规模

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Daniel Hill , Daniel Gregg , Derek Baker
{"title":"在小农目标价值链中权衡包容性、价值和规模","authors":"Daniel Hill ,&nbsp;Daniel Gregg ,&nbsp;Derek Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Smallholder-targeted value chain development is one of the most important market-based strategies for rural development. A wealth of research shows smallholder-targeted value chains can potentially deliver considerable benefits for participating smallholders. However, a divergence in experiences suggests trade-offs: between value outcomes delivered for rural communities; between delivering value and engaging with target populations; and between target development outcomes and the incentives of commercial agribusiness. In this paper we seek to describe how the domains of inclusion, value, and scaling-out should be considered for smallholder-targeted value chains development, and to what extent trade-offs between these domains emerge for smallholder-targeted value chains. To answer these questions, we present a scoping literature review of outcome identification and measurement in smallholder-targeted value chains case studies. From a sample of 344 case studies we show strong evidence for trade-offs. Specifically, smallholder-targeted value chains delivering high-value farm performance outcomes are 87% less likely to be inclusive, relative to value chains with low farm performance outcomes. From the findings of the scoping review, we map the pathways and drivers for the mutual achievement of value, inclusivity, and scalability outcomes for smallholder-targeted value chains. Our review is critical but positive – it presents a critical need for updates to value chain design, but provides the starting point for this design work to be nested within clear conceptual foundations and standardised measures of value chain ‘success’ for rural development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106973"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trading off inclusion, value, and scale within smallholder targeted value chains\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Hill ,&nbsp;Daniel Gregg ,&nbsp;Derek Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Smallholder-targeted value chain development is one of the most important market-based strategies for rural development. A wealth of research shows smallholder-targeted value chains can potentially deliver considerable benefits for participating smallholders. However, a divergence in experiences suggests trade-offs: between value outcomes delivered for rural communities; between delivering value and engaging with target populations; and between target development outcomes and the incentives of commercial agribusiness. In this paper we seek to describe how the domains of inclusion, value, and scaling-out should be considered for smallholder-targeted value chains development, and to what extent trade-offs between these domains emerge for smallholder-targeted value chains. To answer these questions, we present a scoping literature review of outcome identification and measurement in smallholder-targeted value chains case studies. From a sample of 344 case studies we show strong evidence for trade-offs. Specifically, smallholder-targeted value chains delivering high-value farm performance outcomes are 87% less likely to be inclusive, relative to value chains with low farm performance outcomes. From the findings of the scoping review, we map the pathways and drivers for the mutual achievement of value, inclusivity, and scalability outcomes for smallholder-targeted value chains. Our review is critical but positive – it presents a critical need for updates to value chain design, but provides the starting point for this design work to be nested within clear conceptual foundations and standardised measures of value chain ‘success’ for rural development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25000580\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25000580","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以小农为目标的价值链发展是农村发展最重要的市场战略之一。大量研究表明,以小农为目标的价值链可能为参与的小农带来可观的利益。然而,经验的差异表明了权衡:为农村社区提供的价值成果;在提供价值和与目标人群接触之间;在目标发展成果和商业农业企业的激励之间。在本文中,我们试图描述在以小农为目标的价值链发展中,应该如何考虑包容、价值和向外扩展的领域,以及在以小农为目标的价值链中,这些领域之间的权衡在多大程度上出现。为了回答这些问题,我们对以小农为目标的价值链案例研究中的结果识别和测量进行了范围界定文献综述。从344个案例研究的样本中,我们发现了权衡的有力证据。具体而言,与农业绩效较低的价值链相比,以小农为目标的价值链提供高价值农业绩效的可能性要低87%。根据范围审查的结果,我们绘制了针对小农的价值链相互实现价值、包容性和可扩展性结果的途径和驱动因素。我们的评估是关键的,但也是积极的——它提出了更新价值链设计的迫切需要,但也为这项设计工作提供了一个起点,以便将其嵌套在明确的概念基础和农村发展价值链“成功”的标准化衡量标准中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trading off inclusion, value, and scale within smallholder targeted value chains
Smallholder-targeted value chain development is one of the most important market-based strategies for rural development. A wealth of research shows smallholder-targeted value chains can potentially deliver considerable benefits for participating smallholders. However, a divergence in experiences suggests trade-offs: between value outcomes delivered for rural communities; between delivering value and engaging with target populations; and between target development outcomes and the incentives of commercial agribusiness. In this paper we seek to describe how the domains of inclusion, value, and scaling-out should be considered for smallholder-targeted value chains development, and to what extent trade-offs between these domains emerge for smallholder-targeted value chains. To answer these questions, we present a scoping literature review of outcome identification and measurement in smallholder-targeted value chains case studies. From a sample of 344 case studies we show strong evidence for trade-offs. Specifically, smallholder-targeted value chains delivering high-value farm performance outcomes are 87% less likely to be inclusive, relative to value chains with low farm performance outcomes. From the findings of the scoping review, we map the pathways and drivers for the mutual achievement of value, inclusivity, and scalability outcomes for smallholder-targeted value chains. Our review is critical but positive – it presents a critical need for updates to value chain design, but provides the starting point for this design work to be nested within clear conceptual foundations and standardised measures of value chain ‘success’ for rural development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信