利用基于案例的学习和改进的激光临床判断量表(LCJR)进行临床判断技能。

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bev Wilgenbusch, Rebekah Knauer
{"title":"利用基于案例的学习和改进的激光临床判断量表(LCJR)进行临床判断技能。","authors":"Bev Wilgenbusch, Rebekah Knauer","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>It is challenging to assess clinical judgment skill development. The purpose of this study was to understand how case-based learning (CBL) and an innovation to the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) can be used to facilitate and assess clinical judgment skills. A pilot study using a quasi-experimental design was conducted to develop and assess clinical judgment competencies. Data were collected through a pretest/posttest, CBL worksheets, and modified LCJRs. Pretest/posttest results were statistically significant. Significant results were not shown by LCJR data as a whole, but one component demonstrated significant change. Considering the study's brevity, any significant LCJR results are promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":47651,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing Case-Based Learning and a Modified Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) for Clinical Judgment Skills.\",\"authors\":\"Bev Wilgenbusch, Rebekah Knauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>It is challenging to assess clinical judgment skill development. The purpose of this study was to understand how case-based learning (CBL) and an innovation to the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) can be used to facilitate and assess clinical judgment skills. A pilot study using a quasi-experimental design was conducted to develop and assess clinical judgment competencies. Data were collected through a pretest/posttest, CBL worksheets, and modified LCJRs. Pretest/posttest results were statistically significant. Significant results were not shown by LCJR data as a whole, but one component demonstrated significant change. Considering the study's brevity, any significant LCJR results are promising.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Education Perspectives\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Education Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要临床判断技能发展的评估具有挑战性。本研究的目的是了解基于案例的学习(CBL)和Lasater临床判断量表(LCJR)的创新如何用于促进和评估临床判断技能。使用准实验设计的试点研究进行了发展和评估临床判断能力。通过前测/后测、CBL工作表和修改后的LCJRs收集数据。前测/后测结果具有统计学意义。LCJR数据整体上没有显示出显著的结果,但有一个成分显示出显著的变化。考虑到这项研究的简短性,任何重要的LCJR结果都是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing Case-Based Learning and a Modified Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) for Clinical Judgment Skills.

Abstract: It is challenging to assess clinical judgment skill development. The purpose of this study was to understand how case-based learning (CBL) and an innovation to the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) can be used to facilitate and assess clinical judgment skills. A pilot study using a quasi-experimental design was conducted to develop and assess clinical judgment competencies. Data were collected through a pretest/posttest, CBL worksheets, and modified LCJRs. Pretest/posttest results were statistically significant. Significant results were not shown by LCJR data as a whole, but one component demonstrated significant change. Considering the study's brevity, any significant LCJR results are promising.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Education Perspectives
Nursing Education Perspectives EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A publication of the National League for Nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that provides evidence for best practices in nursing education. Through the publication of rigorously designed studies, the journal contributes to the advancement of the science of nursing education. It serves as a forum for research and innovation regarding teaching and learning, curricula, technology, and other issues important to nursing education. Today, as nurse educators strive to advance research in nursing education and break away from established patterns and chart new pathways in nursing education, Nursing Education Perspectives is a vital resource. Nursing Education Perspectives is housed in the NLN Chamberlain College of Nursing for the Advancement of the Science of Nursing Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信