测量已完成住宅康复的人的恢复:物质使用恢复评估者的因素结构和评分。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Emma L Hatton, Peter J Kelly, Raimondo Bruno, Joanne Neale, Briony Larance
{"title":"测量已完成住宅康复的人的恢复:物质使用恢复评估者的因素结构和评分。","authors":"Emma L Hatton, Peter J Kelly, Raimondo Bruno, Joanne Neale, Briony Larance","doi":"10.1111/dar.14004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The substance use recovery evaluator (SURE) is a new patient-reported outcome measure of recovery from alcohol and other drugs. The original SURE validation study did not include clients from residential rehabilitation treatment, and the possible challenges in applying the measure in this setting were noted. This study evaluates the factor structure and scoring of the substance use recovery evaluator for people after discharge from residential alcohol and other drug rehabilitation in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and twenty-five participants interviewed at 14 weeks post-discharge from residential rehabilitation between 2018 and 2020 were included in a cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal data. Item response theory statistics (IRT) were used to determine optimal scoring methods for the SURE. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were used to confirm the SURE's factor structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial CFA of the 5-factor model using original scoring could not be fitted. Although IRT indicated a combination of binary and three-point scale scoring could be used, a binary scale included most of the information from other response categories, and CFA using a Bayes estimation to confirm the original structure with binary data indicated good model fit, p = 0.164.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The SURE has the same five underlying factors identified by the original study, each of which provides important clinical information about recovery. Binary rescoring provides a valid, parsimonious and clinically relevant way of measuring substance use recovery for residential treatment populations post-discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring recovery among people who have completed residential rehabilitation: Factor structure and scoring of the substance use recovery evaluator.\",\"authors\":\"Emma L Hatton, Peter J Kelly, Raimondo Bruno, Joanne Neale, Briony Larance\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.14004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The substance use recovery evaluator (SURE) is a new patient-reported outcome measure of recovery from alcohol and other drugs. The original SURE validation study did not include clients from residential rehabilitation treatment, and the possible challenges in applying the measure in this setting were noted. This study evaluates the factor structure and scoring of the substance use recovery evaluator for people after discharge from residential alcohol and other drug rehabilitation in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and twenty-five participants interviewed at 14 weeks post-discharge from residential rehabilitation between 2018 and 2020 were included in a cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal data. Item response theory statistics (IRT) were used to determine optimal scoring methods for the SURE. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were used to confirm the SURE's factor structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial CFA of the 5-factor model using original scoring could not be fitted. Although IRT indicated a combination of binary and three-point scale scoring could be used, a binary scale included most of the information from other response categories, and CFA using a Bayes estimation to confirm the original structure with binary data indicated good model fit, p = 0.164.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The SURE has the same five underlying factors identified by the original study, each of which provides important clinical information about recovery. Binary rescoring provides a valid, parsimonious and clinically relevant way of measuring substance use recovery for residential treatment populations post-discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.14004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.14004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物质使用恢复评估器(SURE)是一种新的患者报告的从酒精和其他药物中恢复的结果测量。最初的SURE验证研究没有包括来自住宅康复治疗的客户,并且注意到在这种情况下应用该措施可能存在的挑战。本研究评估澳洲居民戒酒及其他戒毒康复后物质使用恢复评估器的因子结构及评分。方法:225名参与者在2018年至2020年期间从住宅康复出院后14周接受采访,并将其纳入纵向数据的横断面分析。采用项目反应理论统计(IRT)来确定最优的确定性评分方法。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)模型验证了SURE的因子结构。结果:使用原始评分的五因素模型的初始CFA无法拟合。虽然IRT表明可以使用二分制和三分制评分,但二分制量表包含了其他反应类别的大部分信息,而CFA使用贝叶斯估计来确认原始结构与二分制数据表明模型拟合良好,p = 0.164。讨论和结论:SURE具有与原始研究相同的五个潜在因素,每个因素都提供了有关康复的重要临床信息。二元评分为住院治疗人群出院后的物质使用恢复提供了一种有效、简洁和临床相关的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring recovery among people who have completed residential rehabilitation: Factor structure and scoring of the substance use recovery evaluator.

Introduction: The substance use recovery evaluator (SURE) is a new patient-reported outcome measure of recovery from alcohol and other drugs. The original SURE validation study did not include clients from residential rehabilitation treatment, and the possible challenges in applying the measure in this setting were noted. This study evaluates the factor structure and scoring of the substance use recovery evaluator for people after discharge from residential alcohol and other drug rehabilitation in Australia.

Methods: Two hundred and twenty-five participants interviewed at 14 weeks post-discharge from residential rehabilitation between 2018 and 2020 were included in a cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal data. Item response theory statistics (IRT) were used to determine optimal scoring methods for the SURE. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were used to confirm the SURE's factor structure.

Results: An initial CFA of the 5-factor model using original scoring could not be fitted. Although IRT indicated a combination of binary and three-point scale scoring could be used, a binary scale included most of the information from other response categories, and CFA using a Bayes estimation to confirm the original structure with binary data indicated good model fit, p = 0.164.

Discussion and conclusions: The SURE has the same five underlying factors identified by the original study, each of which provides important clinical information about recovery. Binary rescoring provides a valid, parsimonious and clinically relevant way of measuring substance use recovery for residential treatment populations post-discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信