评估EMI高等教育中新兴多语言作家学术写作的翻译方法

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Daniel H. Chang , Qinghua Chen , Angel Mei Yi Lin
{"title":"评估EMI高等教育中新兴多语言作家学术写作的翻译方法","authors":"Daniel H. Chang ,&nbsp;Qinghua Chen ,&nbsp;Angel Mei Yi Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing from the first author's teaching experience in a first-year disciplinary writing course and observations, this article develops a theory to address the limitations of standardized language tests in assessing multilingual writers’ skills. These tests emphasize formulaic tasks that do not align with the complexities of university writing activities, such as reflection, or argumentation. The first author's observation of 25 first-year writers engaging with institutional writing support services reveal that academic writing is a complex process, rarely captured by standardized tests. We propose the Reflective Writing Space (RWS) model, a paradigm-shifting framework that reconceptualizes writing assessment through three interconnected dimensions: content &amp; context, skill development, and language use and proficiency. This model advocates for a more inclusive and interactive approach that actively engages students, tutors, and instructors in teaching writing. We conclude with practical recommendations for implementing the RWS framework to better support multilingual writers’ academic writing development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translingual approach in assessing academic writing for emerging multilingual writers in EMI higher education\",\"authors\":\"Daniel H. Chang ,&nbsp;Qinghua Chen ,&nbsp;Angel Mei Yi Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Drawing from the first author's teaching experience in a first-year disciplinary writing course and observations, this article develops a theory to address the limitations of standardized language tests in assessing multilingual writers’ skills. These tests emphasize formulaic tasks that do not align with the complexities of university writing activities, such as reflection, or argumentation. The first author's observation of 25 first-year writers engaging with institutional writing support services reveal that academic writing is a complex process, rarely captured by standardized tests. We propose the Reflective Writing Space (RWS) model, a paradigm-shifting framework that reconceptualizes writing assessment through three interconnected dimensions: content &amp; context, skill development, and language use and proficiency. This model advocates for a more inclusive and interactive approach that actively engages students, tutors, and instructors in teaching writing. We conclude with practical recommendations for implementing the RWS framework to better support multilingual writers’ academic writing development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089858982500021X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089858982500021X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据第一作者在一年级学科写作课程中的教学经验和观察,本文发展了一个理论来解决标准化语言测试在评估多语言作家技能方面的局限性。这些测试强调的是公式化的任务,与大学写作活动的复杂性不一致,比如反思或论证。第一作者观察了25位参与机构写作支持服务的一年级作家,发现学术写作是一个复杂的过程,很少被标准化测试捕获。我们提出反思写作空间(RWS)模型,这是一个范式转换框架,通过三个相互关联的维度重新定义写作评估:内容;语境,技能发展,语言使用和熟练程度。这种模式提倡一种更具包容性和互动性的方法,积极地让学生、导师和教师参与写作教学。最后,我们提出了实施RWS框架的实用建议,以更好地支持多语种作家的学术写作发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translingual approach in assessing academic writing for emerging multilingual writers in EMI higher education
Drawing from the first author's teaching experience in a first-year disciplinary writing course and observations, this article develops a theory to address the limitations of standardized language tests in assessing multilingual writers’ skills. These tests emphasize formulaic tasks that do not align with the complexities of university writing activities, such as reflection, or argumentation. The first author's observation of 25 first-year writers engaging with institutional writing support services reveal that academic writing is a complex process, rarely captured by standardized tests. We propose the Reflective Writing Space (RWS) model, a paradigm-shifting framework that reconceptualizes writing assessment through three interconnected dimensions: content & context, skill development, and language use and proficiency. This model advocates for a more inclusive and interactive approach that actively engages students, tutors, and instructors in teaching writing. We conclude with practical recommendations for implementing the RWS framework to better support multilingual writers’ academic writing development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信