自助干预对饮食失调治疗和预防的心理健康影响。一个荟萃分析。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jake Linardon, Hannah K Jarman, Claudia Liu, Cleo Anderson, Zoe McClure, Mariel Messer
{"title":"自助干预对饮食失调治疗和预防的心理健康影响。一个荟萃分析。","authors":"Jake Linardon, Hannah K Jarman, Claudia Liu, Cleo Anderson, Zoe McClure, Mariel Messer","doi":"10.1002/eat.24405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-help programs are recommended as a first step in the management of eating disorders. Yet, whether self-help interventions have broader mental health benefits beyond symptom and risk reduction remains unclear. As randomized controlled trials (RCTs) also assess general mental health secondary to eating disorder symptoms, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate whether and to what extent pure self-help interventions for eating disorders produce improvements in these secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven RCTs of pure self-help interventions for the prevention or treatment of eating disorders were included. Mean age ranged from 16 to 46 years. Most self-help interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy. Most interventions were delivered via digital means (Internet, apps, etc.). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted on six outcomes: depression, anxiety, general distress, quality of life, self-esteem, and psychosocial impairment. Analyses were stratified based on pre-selected (at risk/symptomatic) and clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For pre-selected samples (k = 18), significant pooled effects favoring self-help over controls were observed for depression (g = 0.24), anxiety (g = 0.23), distress (g = 0.23) and self-esteem (g = 0.18). Effects remained robust when adjusting for risk of bias. Non-significant effects were observed for quality of life and impairment. Crucially, > 80% of trials on pre-selected samples delivered a waitlist control. For clinical samples (k = 9), significant pooled effects favoring self-help were found for distress (g = 0.39), impairment (g = 0.39), and quality of life (g = 0.29), although these results should be interpreted with caution as the number of studies was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-help interventions produce small improvements in those mental health symptoms that are typically comorbid with eating disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental Health Impacts of Self-Help Interventions for the Treatment and Prevention of Eating Disorders. A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jake Linardon, Hannah K Jarman, Claudia Liu, Cleo Anderson, Zoe McClure, Mariel Messer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-help programs are recommended as a first step in the management of eating disorders. Yet, whether self-help interventions have broader mental health benefits beyond symptom and risk reduction remains unclear. As randomized controlled trials (RCTs) also assess general mental health secondary to eating disorder symptoms, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate whether and to what extent pure self-help interventions for eating disorders produce improvements in these secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven RCTs of pure self-help interventions for the prevention or treatment of eating disorders were included. Mean age ranged from 16 to 46 years. Most self-help interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy. Most interventions were delivered via digital means (Internet, apps, etc.). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted on six outcomes: depression, anxiety, general distress, quality of life, self-esteem, and psychosocial impairment. Analyses were stratified based on pre-selected (at risk/symptomatic) and clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For pre-selected samples (k = 18), significant pooled effects favoring self-help over controls were observed for depression (g = 0.24), anxiety (g = 0.23), distress (g = 0.23) and self-esteem (g = 0.18). Effects remained robust when adjusting for risk of bias. Non-significant effects were observed for quality of life and impairment. Crucially, > 80% of trials on pre-selected samples delivered a waitlist control. For clinical samples (k = 9), significant pooled effects favoring self-help were found for distress (g = 0.39), impairment (g = 0.39), and quality of life (g = 0.29), although these results should be interpreted with caution as the number of studies was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-help interventions produce small improvements in those mental health symptoms that are typically comorbid with eating disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24405\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自助计划被推荐为饮食失调管理的第一步。然而,除了减少症状和风险之外,自助干预是否有更广泛的心理健康益处仍不清楚。由于随机对照试验(rct)也评估饮食失调症状继发的一般心理健康,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以调查饮食失调的纯自助干预是否以及在多大程度上改善了这些继发结果。方法:纳入27项纯自助干预预防或治疗饮食失调的随机对照试验。平均年龄16至46岁。大多数自助干预都是基于认知行为疗法。大多数干预措施是通过数字手段(互联网、应用程序等)提供的。随机效应荟萃分析对六项结果进行:抑郁、焦虑、一般痛苦、生活质量、自尊和社会心理障碍。根据预选(有危险/有症状)和临床样本进行分层分析。结果:对于预先选择的样本(k = 18),在抑郁(g = 0.24)、焦虑(g = 0.23)、痛苦(g = 0.23)和自尊(g = 0.18)方面,观察到显著的集中效应有利于自助。在调整偏倚风险后,效果仍然稳健。在生活质量和损伤方面观察到无显著影响。至关重要的是,在预先选择的样本中,80%的试验提供了候补名单控制。对于临床样本(k = 9),在痛苦(g = 0.39)、损害(g = 0.39)和生活质量(g = 0.29)方面发现了有利于自助的显著综合效应,尽管由于研究数量较少,这些结果应谨慎解释。结论:自助干预对那些通常与饮食失调共病的心理健康症状产生了微小的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental Health Impacts of Self-Help Interventions for the Treatment and Prevention of Eating Disorders. A Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Self-help programs are recommended as a first step in the management of eating disorders. Yet, whether self-help interventions have broader mental health benefits beyond symptom and risk reduction remains unclear. As randomized controlled trials (RCTs) also assess general mental health secondary to eating disorder symptoms, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate whether and to what extent pure self-help interventions for eating disorders produce improvements in these secondary outcomes.

Method: Twenty-seven RCTs of pure self-help interventions for the prevention or treatment of eating disorders were included. Mean age ranged from 16 to 46 years. Most self-help interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy. Most interventions were delivered via digital means (Internet, apps, etc.). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted on six outcomes: depression, anxiety, general distress, quality of life, self-esteem, and psychosocial impairment. Analyses were stratified based on pre-selected (at risk/symptomatic) and clinical samples.

Results: For pre-selected samples (k = 18), significant pooled effects favoring self-help over controls were observed for depression (g = 0.24), anxiety (g = 0.23), distress (g = 0.23) and self-esteem (g = 0.18). Effects remained robust when adjusting for risk of bias. Non-significant effects were observed for quality of life and impairment. Crucially, > 80% of trials on pre-selected samples delivered a waitlist control. For clinical samples (k = 9), significant pooled effects favoring self-help were found for distress (g = 0.39), impairment (g = 0.39), and quality of life (g = 0.29), although these results should be interpreted with caution as the number of studies was low.

Conclusion: Self-help interventions produce small improvements in those mental health symptoms that are typically comorbid with eating disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信