卫生保健工作者中与covid -19相关的阴谋论的流行、性质和决定因素:范围审查

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hanne Loyens, Johan Detraux, Marc De Hert
{"title":"卫生保健工作者中与covid -19相关的阴谋论的流行、性质和决定因素:范围审查","authors":"Hanne Loyens, Johan Detraux, Marc De Hert","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19-related conspiracy theories (CTs) have been observed among healthcare workers (HCWs). There exists, however, a lack of research investigating the extent, nature, and determinants of CTs among HCWs worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL electronic databases (from inception to October 2023) was conducted for studies examining the prevalence and nature of COVID-19-related CTs among HCWs and health students and/or factors driving HCWs into believing these CTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence rates of COVID-19-related CTs among HCWs varied widely across studies, ranging from 0.89% to 75.6%. These prevalence rates mainly concern vaccine-hesitant HCWs (although a minority of vaccinated HCWs also endorse CTs). Higher prevalence rates of CTs were found in the Arab world, Ethiopia, and Nigeria, compared to other African and Western countries. While in European countries and Northern America, an increased belief of HCWs in the \"destabilization and power gain\" narrative was found, African HCWs particularly endorsed the \"population reduction\" and \"liberty restriction\" narratives. Limited and heterogeneous data prevented conclusive findings on the relationship between CTs and sociodemographic factors, ethnicity, and psychological traits among HCWs. However, a consistent observation emerged regarding the level of education, indicating HCWs with higher educational attainment (e.g., physicians) tend to endorse CTs less frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although COVID-19-related CTs may be highly prevalent among vaccine-hesitant HCWs, gaps in understanding the drivers of CTs among HCWs remain. Given HCWs' critical role in public health, especially during pandemics, further research is therefore essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e62"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence, nature, and determinants of COVID-19-related conspiracy theories among healthcare workers: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Hanne Loyens, Johan Detraux, Marc De Hert\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19-related conspiracy theories (CTs) have been observed among healthcare workers (HCWs). There exists, however, a lack of research investigating the extent, nature, and determinants of CTs among HCWs worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL electronic databases (from inception to October 2023) was conducted for studies examining the prevalence and nature of COVID-19-related CTs among HCWs and health students and/or factors driving HCWs into believing these CTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence rates of COVID-19-related CTs among HCWs varied widely across studies, ranging from 0.89% to 75.6%. These prevalence rates mainly concern vaccine-hesitant HCWs (although a minority of vaccinated HCWs also endorse CTs). Higher prevalence rates of CTs were found in the Arab world, Ethiopia, and Nigeria, compared to other African and Western countries. While in European countries and Northern America, an increased belief of HCWs in the \\\"destabilization and power gain\\\" narrative was found, African HCWs particularly endorsed the \\\"population reduction\\\" and \\\"liberty restriction\\\" narratives. Limited and heterogeneous data prevented conclusive findings on the relationship between CTs and sociodemographic factors, ethnicity, and psychological traits among HCWs. However, a consistent observation emerged regarding the level of education, indicating HCWs with higher educational attainment (e.g., physicians) tend to endorse CTs less frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although COVID-19-related CTs may be highly prevalent among vaccine-hesitant HCWs, gaps in understanding the drivers of CTs among HCWs remain. Given HCWs' critical role in public health, especially during pandemics, further research is therefore essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.12\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.12","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在医护人员中发现了与covid -19相关的阴谋论(CTs)。然而,缺乏调查全球卫生保健工作者中ct的程度、性质和决定因素的研究。方法:系统检索Medline、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus和CINAHL电子数据库(从创建到2023年10月)的文献,研究医护人员和卫生专业学生中covid -19相关ct的患病率和性质,以及/或促使医护人员相信这些ct的因素。结果:在不同的研究中,医护人员的covid -19相关ct患病率差异很大,从0.89%到75.6%不等。这些流行率主要与不愿接种疫苗的卫生保健工作者有关(尽管少数接种过疫苗的卫生保健工作者也支持ct)。与其他非洲和西方国家相比,阿拉伯世界、埃塞俄比亚和尼日利亚的ct患病率较高。在欧洲国家和北美,人们发现越来越多的卫生工作者相信“不稳定和权力获取”的叙述,而非洲卫生工作者特别赞同“人口减少”和“自由限制”的叙述。有限且异质性的数据阻碍了对ct与卫生保健工作者中社会人口因素、种族和心理特征之间关系的结论性发现。然而,在教育水平方面出现了一致的观察结果,表明受教育程度较高的卫生保健工作者(如医生)倾向于不太频繁地支持ct。结论:尽管与covid -19相关的ct可能在疫苗犹豫的医护人员中非常普遍,但在了解医护人员中ct的驱动因素方面仍然存在差距。鉴于卫生保健人员在公共卫生方面的关键作用,特别是在大流行期间,因此必须进一步开展研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence, nature, and determinants of COVID-19-related conspiracy theories among healthcare workers: a scoping review.

Background: COVID-19-related conspiracy theories (CTs) have been observed among healthcare workers (HCWs). There exists, however, a lack of research investigating the extent, nature, and determinants of CTs among HCWs worldwide.

Methods: A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL electronic databases (from inception to October 2023) was conducted for studies examining the prevalence and nature of COVID-19-related CTs among HCWs and health students and/or factors driving HCWs into believing these CTs.

Results: Prevalence rates of COVID-19-related CTs among HCWs varied widely across studies, ranging from 0.89% to 75.6%. These prevalence rates mainly concern vaccine-hesitant HCWs (although a minority of vaccinated HCWs also endorse CTs). Higher prevalence rates of CTs were found in the Arab world, Ethiopia, and Nigeria, compared to other African and Western countries. While in European countries and Northern America, an increased belief of HCWs in the "destabilization and power gain" narrative was found, African HCWs particularly endorsed the "population reduction" and "liberty restriction" narratives. Limited and heterogeneous data prevented conclusive findings on the relationship between CTs and sociodemographic factors, ethnicity, and psychological traits among HCWs. However, a consistent observation emerged regarding the level of education, indicating HCWs with higher educational attainment (e.g., physicians) tend to endorse CTs less frequently.

Conclusion: Although COVID-19-related CTs may be highly prevalent among vaccine-hesitant HCWs, gaps in understanding the drivers of CTs among HCWs remain. Given HCWs' critical role in public health, especially during pandemics, further research is therefore essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信