在缓发性灾害中支持粮食安全的有效策略是什么?文献的混合方法系统综述

IF 4.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Hiep N. Le, Ernesta Sofija, Neil Harris, Reny Noviasty, Thu Nguyen, Hai Phung
{"title":"在缓发性灾害中支持粮食安全的有效策略是什么?文献的混合方法系统综述","authors":"Hiep N. Le,&nbsp;Ernesta Sofija,&nbsp;Neil Harris,&nbsp;Reny Noviasty,&nbsp;Thu Nguyen,&nbsp;Hai Phung","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Having access to food is a human entitlement and one of the essential goals of the sustainable development agenda. Despite growing concern about the impact of slow-onset disasters on food security, most interventions have primarily targeted sudden-onset disasters. As such, there has been limited attention to understanding the effectiveness of adaptation strategies in safeguarding food security during disaster events. The aim of this research was to synthesize all existing evidence on the effectiveness of adaptation strategies in addressing food insecurity during gradual-onset disasters. This study employs Hadley et al.'s food security framework to examine the effectiveness of existing adaptation strategies in mitigating food insecurity concerns during slow-onset disasters. A mixed-method systematic review was conducted using five electronic databases up to July 2023 and followed the guidelines regarding the convergent segregated approach to synthesize the findings. The review showed that most studies (94.1%) focused on drought, neglecting other slow-onset disasters. The strategies mostly focused on ensuring the availability and accessibility of food while giving little attention to food utilization. Most food security components have somewhat identified their effectiveness, except for food safety, with no studies exploring it. Findings from the mixed-methods approach also highlight the double-edged effects of adaptation strategies and the notable absence of reliable intervention evidence using randomized controlled trials. It is crucial for future research to broaden the scope to include the less studied types of slow-onset disasters. Emphasizing neglected and underutilized species, along with food safety aspects, might unveil novel approaches to boost food utilization in fluctuating climates. Given the heterogeneous nature of slow-onset disaster impacts, it is important to explore these dynamic and context-specific aspects of adaptation strategies in different conditions. Utilizing methods like randomized controlled trials in future research will enhance the evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Strategies Are Effective to Support Food Security in Slow-Onset Disasters? A Mixed-Method Systematic Review of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Hiep N. Le,&nbsp;Ernesta Sofija,&nbsp;Neil Harris,&nbsp;Reny Noviasty,&nbsp;Thu Nguyen,&nbsp;Hai Phung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fes3.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Having access to food is a human entitlement and one of the essential goals of the sustainable development agenda. Despite growing concern about the impact of slow-onset disasters on food security, most interventions have primarily targeted sudden-onset disasters. As such, there has been limited attention to understanding the effectiveness of adaptation strategies in safeguarding food security during disaster events. The aim of this research was to synthesize all existing evidence on the effectiveness of adaptation strategies in addressing food insecurity during gradual-onset disasters. This study employs Hadley et al.'s food security framework to examine the effectiveness of existing adaptation strategies in mitigating food insecurity concerns during slow-onset disasters. A mixed-method systematic review was conducted using five electronic databases up to July 2023 and followed the guidelines regarding the convergent segregated approach to synthesize the findings. The review showed that most studies (94.1%) focused on drought, neglecting other slow-onset disasters. The strategies mostly focused on ensuring the availability and accessibility of food while giving little attention to food utilization. Most food security components have somewhat identified their effectiveness, except for food safety, with no studies exploring it. Findings from the mixed-methods approach also highlight the double-edged effects of adaptation strategies and the notable absence of reliable intervention evidence using randomized controlled trials. It is crucial for future research to broaden the scope to include the less studied types of slow-onset disasters. Emphasizing neglected and underutilized species, along with food safety aspects, might unveil novel approaches to boost food utilization in fluctuating climates. Given the heterogeneous nature of slow-onset disaster impacts, it is important to explore these dynamic and context-specific aspects of adaptation strategies in different conditions. Utilizing methods like randomized controlled trials in future research will enhance the evidence base.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Energy Security\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Energy Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

获得食物是人类的一项权利,也是可持续发展议程的基本目标之一。尽管人们越来越关注缓慢发生的灾害对粮食安全的影响,但大多数干预措施主要针对突发性灾害。因此,了解适应战略在灾害事件期间保障粮食安全方面的有效性的关注有限。本研究的目的是综合所有现有的证据,证明适应策略在解决逐渐发生的灾害期间的粮食不安全问题方面的有效性。本研究采用Hadley等人的粮食安全框架来检验现有适应战略在缓发灾害期间减轻粮食不安全问题方面的有效性。截至2023年7月,使用5个电子数据库进行混合方法系统评价,并遵循关于趋同隔离方法的指导方针来综合研究结果。回顾显示,大多数研究(94.1%)集中在干旱上,忽视了其他缓慢发生的灾害。这些战略主要侧重于确保粮食的供应和可及性,而很少注意粮食的利用。除了食品安全之外,大多数食品安全组成部分都多少确定了其有效性,但没有研究对此进行探索。混合方法的研究结果还强调了适应策略的双刃剑效应,以及随机对照试验中缺乏可靠的干预证据。对于未来的研究来说,扩大研究范围,包括研究较少的慢发灾害类型是至关重要的。强调被忽视和未充分利用的物种,以及食品安全方面,可能会揭示在波动气候下提高粮食利用的新方法。鉴于慢发灾害影响的异质性,探索不同条件下适应策略的这些动态和具体环境方面是很重要的。在未来的研究中采用随机对照试验等方法将增强证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What Strategies Are Effective to Support Food Security in Slow-Onset Disasters? A Mixed-Method Systematic Review of the Literature

What Strategies Are Effective to Support Food Security in Slow-Onset Disasters? A Mixed-Method Systematic Review of the Literature

Having access to food is a human entitlement and one of the essential goals of the sustainable development agenda. Despite growing concern about the impact of slow-onset disasters on food security, most interventions have primarily targeted sudden-onset disasters. As such, there has been limited attention to understanding the effectiveness of adaptation strategies in safeguarding food security during disaster events. The aim of this research was to synthesize all existing evidence on the effectiveness of adaptation strategies in addressing food insecurity during gradual-onset disasters. This study employs Hadley et al.'s food security framework to examine the effectiveness of existing adaptation strategies in mitigating food insecurity concerns during slow-onset disasters. A mixed-method systematic review was conducted using five electronic databases up to July 2023 and followed the guidelines regarding the convergent segregated approach to synthesize the findings. The review showed that most studies (94.1%) focused on drought, neglecting other slow-onset disasters. The strategies mostly focused on ensuring the availability and accessibility of food while giving little attention to food utilization. Most food security components have somewhat identified their effectiveness, except for food safety, with no studies exploring it. Findings from the mixed-methods approach also highlight the double-edged effects of adaptation strategies and the notable absence of reliable intervention evidence using randomized controlled trials. It is crucial for future research to broaden the scope to include the less studied types of slow-onset disasters. Emphasizing neglected and underutilized species, along with food safety aspects, might unveil novel approaches to boost food utilization in fluctuating climates. Given the heterogeneous nature of slow-onset disaster impacts, it is important to explore these dynamic and context-specific aspects of adaptation strategies in different conditions. Utilizing methods like randomized controlled trials in future research will enhance the evidence base.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Energy Security
Food and Energy Security Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor. Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights. Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge. Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include: • Agronomy • Biotechnological Approaches • Breeding & Genetics • Climate Change • Quality and Composition • Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks • Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry • Functional Genomics • Molecular Biology • Pest and Disease Management • Post Harvest Biology • Soil Science • Systems Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信