Ankita Bhattashali, Gregory A. Cheatham, Chavis Lickvar-Armstrong, Jisun R. Oh, Gospel Kim
{"title":"将知识资金纳入教师准备,克服教育教学中的偏见","authors":"Ankita Bhattashali, Gregory A. Cheatham, Chavis Lickvar-Armstrong, Jisun R. Oh, Gospel Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10643-025-01886-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Child developmental milestones are deeply rooted in Western developmental theory and, therefore, cannot be assumed to generalize to culturally and racially minoritized (CRM) children and families, including those who are from international backgrounds. When developmental milestones are exclusively used to assess children’s development and make decisions about child goals, Early Childhood Education (ECE) and Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) practitioners may perpetuate unconscious bias by favoring Western expectations of child development. This can have negative consequences for children and families who are CRM. For example, children can be misdiagnosed with delays and continuing disproportionality in ECSE. To address this problem, we propose strategies to prepare ECE/ECSE preservice teachers to counter biases towards children from CRM backgrounds. In this conceptual paper with an emphasis on practical strategies, we provide an overarching framework of Funds of Knowledge [FoK; Esteban-Guitart and Moll, Cult Psychol 20(1):31–48, 2014] that can be incorporated into a preservice teacher preparation program. Next, we propose the following practical strategies aligned with FoK, which can be included in preservice teacher education: (1) assigning mentor families from CRM backgrounds to support preservice teachers learning about developing meaningful partnerships with families and (2) embedding opportunities for social identity mapping (Jacobson and Mustafa, Int J Qual Methods 18:1–12, 2019), a practice that prompts preservice teachers to reflect on their assumptions and biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming Bias in ECSE by Incorporating Funds of Knowledge in Teacher Preparation\",\"authors\":\"Ankita Bhattashali, Gregory A. Cheatham, Chavis Lickvar-Armstrong, Jisun R. Oh, Gospel Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10643-025-01886-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Child developmental milestones are deeply rooted in Western developmental theory and, therefore, cannot be assumed to generalize to culturally and racially minoritized (CRM) children and families, including those who are from international backgrounds. When developmental milestones are exclusively used to assess children’s development and make decisions about child goals, Early Childhood Education (ECE) and Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) practitioners may perpetuate unconscious bias by favoring Western expectations of child development. This can have negative consequences for children and families who are CRM. For example, children can be misdiagnosed with delays and continuing disproportionality in ECSE. To address this problem, we propose strategies to prepare ECE/ECSE preservice teachers to counter biases towards children from CRM backgrounds. In this conceptual paper with an emphasis on practical strategies, we provide an overarching framework of Funds of Knowledge [FoK; Esteban-Guitart and Moll, Cult Psychol 20(1):31–48, 2014] that can be incorporated into a preservice teacher preparation program. Next, we propose the following practical strategies aligned with FoK, which can be included in preservice teacher education: (1) assigning mentor families from CRM backgrounds to support preservice teachers learning about developing meaningful partnerships with families and (2) embedding opportunities for social identity mapping (Jacobson and Mustafa, Int J Qual Methods 18:1–12, 2019), a practice that prompts preservice teachers to reflect on their assumptions and biases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01886-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01886-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
儿童发展的里程碑深深植根于西方的发展理论,因此,不能被假设为推广到文化和种族少数(CRM)儿童和家庭,包括那些来自国际背景的儿童和家庭。当发展里程碑被专门用于评估儿童的发展和制定儿童目标的决定时,幼儿教育(ECE)和幼儿特殊教育(ECSE)的从业者可能会通过支持西方对儿童发展的期望而使无意识的偏见持续下去。这可能会对患有CRM的儿童和家庭产生负面影响。例如,儿童可能被误诊为ECSE的延迟和持续的不成比例。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一些策略来培养ECE/ECSE职前教师,以对抗对CRM背景儿童的偏见。在这篇强调实践策略的概念性论文中,我们提供了一个知识基金的总体框架[FoK;Esteban-Guitart and Moll,邪教心理,20(1):31-48,2014]。接下来,我们提出了以下与FoK相一致的实践策略,这些策略可以包含在职前教师教育中:(1)分配来自CRM背景的导师家庭,以支持职前教师学习如何与家庭建立有意义的伙伴关系;(2)嵌入社会身份映射的机会(Jacobson和Mustafa, Int J Qual Methods 18:1-12, 2019),这种做法促使职前教师反思他们的假设和偏见。
Overcoming Bias in ECSE by Incorporating Funds of Knowledge in Teacher Preparation
Child developmental milestones are deeply rooted in Western developmental theory and, therefore, cannot be assumed to generalize to culturally and racially minoritized (CRM) children and families, including those who are from international backgrounds. When developmental milestones are exclusively used to assess children’s development and make decisions about child goals, Early Childhood Education (ECE) and Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) practitioners may perpetuate unconscious bias by favoring Western expectations of child development. This can have negative consequences for children and families who are CRM. For example, children can be misdiagnosed with delays and continuing disproportionality in ECSE. To address this problem, we propose strategies to prepare ECE/ECSE preservice teachers to counter biases towards children from CRM backgrounds. In this conceptual paper with an emphasis on practical strategies, we provide an overarching framework of Funds of Knowledge [FoK; Esteban-Guitart and Moll, Cult Psychol 20(1):31–48, 2014] that can be incorporated into a preservice teacher preparation program. Next, we propose the following practical strategies aligned with FoK, which can be included in preservice teacher education: (1) assigning mentor families from CRM backgrounds to support preservice teachers learning about developing meaningful partnerships with families and (2) embedding opportunities for social identity mapping (Jacobson and Mustafa, Int J Qual Methods 18:1–12, 2019), a practice that prompts preservice teachers to reflect on their assumptions and biases.
期刊介绍:
Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children.
Areas of Emphasis:
International studies;
Educational programs in diverse settings;
Early learning across multiple domains;
Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration;
Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies;
Best practices in early childhood teacher education;
Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development;
Family, school, and community relationships;
Investigations related to curriculum and instruction;
Articles that link theory and best practices;
Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field