好东西太多:美国玉米带根瘤蚜 Bt 玉米的教训。

IF 44.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1126/science.adm7634
Ziwei Ye, Christina DiFonzo, David A Hennessy, Jinhua Zhao, Felicia Wu, Shawn P Conley, Aaron J Gassmann, Erin W Hodgson, Bryan Jensen, Janet J Knodel, Bradley McManus, Lance J Meinke, Andrew Michel, Bruce Potter, Nicholas J Seiter, Jocelyn L Smith, Joseph L Spencer, Kelley J Tilmon, Robert J Wright, Christian H Krupke
{"title":"好东西太多:美国玉米带根瘤蚜 Bt 玉米的教训。","authors":"Ziwei Ye, Christina DiFonzo, David A Hennessy, Jinhua Zhao, Felicia Wu, Shawn P Conley, Aaron J Gassmann, Erin W Hodgson, Bryan Jensen, Janet J Knodel, Bradley McManus, Lance J Meinke, Andrew Michel, Bruce Potter, Nicholas J Seiter, Jocelyn L Smith, Joseph L Spencer, Kelley J Tilmon, Robert J Wright, Christian H Krupke","doi":"10.1126/science.adm7634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Widespread use of genetically engineered maize targeting the corn rootworm complex (<i>Diabrotica</i> species) has raised concerns about insect resistance. Twelve years of university field trial and farm survey data from 10 US Corn Belt states indicate that maize hybrids expressing toxins derived from the bacterium <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> (Bt maize) exhibited declining protection from rootworm feeding with increased planting while pest pressures simultaneously decreased. The analysis revealed a tendency to overplant Bt maize, leading to substantial economic losses; this was particularly striking in eastern Corn Belt states. Our findings highlight the need to go beyond the \"tragedy of the commons\" perspective to protect sustainable use of Bt and other crop biotechnology resources. We propose moving toward a more diversified and transparent seed supply.</p>","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":"387 6737","pages":"984-989"},"PeriodicalIF":44.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too much of a good thing: Lessons from compromised rootworm Bt maize in the US Corn Belt.\",\"authors\":\"Ziwei Ye, Christina DiFonzo, David A Hennessy, Jinhua Zhao, Felicia Wu, Shawn P Conley, Aaron J Gassmann, Erin W Hodgson, Bryan Jensen, Janet J Knodel, Bradley McManus, Lance J Meinke, Andrew Michel, Bruce Potter, Nicholas J Seiter, Jocelyn L Smith, Joseph L Spencer, Kelley J Tilmon, Robert J Wright, Christian H Krupke\",\"doi\":\"10.1126/science.adm7634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Widespread use of genetically engineered maize targeting the corn rootworm complex (<i>Diabrotica</i> species) has raised concerns about insect resistance. Twelve years of university field trial and farm survey data from 10 US Corn Belt states indicate that maize hybrids expressing toxins derived from the bacterium <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> (Bt maize) exhibited declining protection from rootworm feeding with increased planting while pest pressures simultaneously decreased. The analysis revealed a tendency to overplant Bt maize, leading to substantial economic losses; this was particularly striking in eastern Corn Belt states. Our findings highlight the need to go beyond the \\\"tragedy of the commons\\\" perspective to protect sustainable use of Bt and other crop biotechnology resources. We propose moving toward a more diversified and transparent seed supply.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science\",\"volume\":\"387 6737\",\"pages\":\"984-989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":44.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adm7634\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adm7634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Too much of a good thing: Lessons from compromised rootworm Bt maize in the US Corn Belt.

Widespread use of genetically engineered maize targeting the corn rootworm complex (Diabrotica species) has raised concerns about insect resistance. Twelve years of university field trial and farm survey data from 10 US Corn Belt states indicate that maize hybrids expressing toxins derived from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt maize) exhibited declining protection from rootworm feeding with increased planting while pest pressures simultaneously decreased. The analysis revealed a tendency to overplant Bt maize, leading to substantial economic losses; this was particularly striking in eastern Corn Belt states. Our findings highlight the need to go beyond the "tragedy of the commons" perspective to protect sustainable use of Bt and other crop biotechnology resources. We propose moving toward a more diversified and transparent seed supply.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science
Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
61.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research. Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信