全球农业研究与创新合作如何影响南方国家的农业研究与创新体系转型?中英合作的证据

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Bin Wu , Cong Cao , Simon Mosey , Tim Daniell , Peter Noy , Yizhe Cui , Min Rose , Jonathan Snape
{"title":"全球农业研究与创新合作如何影响南方国家的农业研究与创新体系转型?中英合作的证据","authors":"Bin Wu ,&nbsp;Cong Cao ,&nbsp;Simon Mosey ,&nbsp;Tim Daniell ,&nbsp;Peter Noy ,&nbsp;Yizhe Cui ,&nbsp;Min Rose ,&nbsp;Jonathan Snape","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The need for agri-food system transformation has sparked extensive debates on reconfiguring the agricultural research and innovation system (ARIS) to tackle the multidimensional and interwoven challenges present across geographies and scales. This paper highlights the emergence of China, India and Brazil, and their increasing influence on ARIS in the South. We conceptualise global agricultural R&amp;I cooperation (ARIC) to examine how the changing nature of the cooperation between major players from the North and the South influences ARIS transformation in the South. We propose a local–global nexus (LGN) framework to reveal multiple processes involving researchers and non-academic actors for joint knowledge production and social impact across scales. We explore LGN’s feasibility through a case study of UK-China cooperation to illustrate the necessity and key factors influencing the participation of non-academic actors including smallholder farmers in ARIC. Evidence for this paper comes from a combination of primary data collected from 52 British scientists, representatives of funding agencies and entrepreneurs regarding their experiences, opinions and perceptions of ARIC through bilateral cooperation, and second sources. This paper contributes to ARIS transformation debates from three perspectives. First, it sheds new light on transformative innovation debates by adding an ARIC element for ARIS transformation in the South. Second, it enriches a “pathways approach” by delineating four pathways of ARIC, as well as top-down and bottom-up processes across various scales. Third, it offers an LGN framework for ARIC research to address the complexity, diversity and opportunities for ARIS transformation towards sustainable and equitable agri-food systems in the South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 102813"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does global agricultural research and innovation cooperation influence agricultural R&I system transformation in the South? Evidence from UK-China cooperation\",\"authors\":\"Bin Wu ,&nbsp;Cong Cao ,&nbsp;Simon Mosey ,&nbsp;Tim Daniell ,&nbsp;Peter Noy ,&nbsp;Yizhe Cui ,&nbsp;Min Rose ,&nbsp;Jonathan Snape\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The need for agri-food system transformation has sparked extensive debates on reconfiguring the agricultural research and innovation system (ARIS) to tackle the multidimensional and interwoven challenges present across geographies and scales. This paper highlights the emergence of China, India and Brazil, and their increasing influence on ARIS in the South. We conceptualise global agricultural R&amp;I cooperation (ARIC) to examine how the changing nature of the cooperation between major players from the North and the South influences ARIS transformation in the South. We propose a local–global nexus (LGN) framework to reveal multiple processes involving researchers and non-academic actors for joint knowledge production and social impact across scales. We explore LGN’s feasibility through a case study of UK-China cooperation to illustrate the necessity and key factors influencing the participation of non-academic actors including smallholder farmers in ARIC. Evidence for this paper comes from a combination of primary data collected from 52 British scientists, representatives of funding agencies and entrepreneurs regarding their experiences, opinions and perceptions of ARIC through bilateral cooperation, and second sources. This paper contributes to ARIS transformation debates from three perspectives. First, it sheds new light on transformative innovation debates by adding an ARIC element for ARIS transformation in the South. Second, it enriches a “pathways approach” by delineating four pathways of ARIC, as well as top-down and bottom-up processes across various scales. Third, it offers an LGN framework for ARIC research to address the complexity, diversity and opportunities for ARIS transformation towards sustainable and equitable agri-food systems in the South.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922500017X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922500017X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业食品系统转型的必要性引发了关于重新配置农业研究和创新系统(ARIS)以应对跨地域和规模的多维和相互交织的挑战的广泛辩论。本文重点介绍了中国、印度和巴西的崛起,以及它们对南方国家的ARIS日益增长的影响。我们将全球农业研发合作(ARIC)概念化,以研究北方和南方主要参与者之间合作性质的变化如何影响南方农业研发合作的转型。我们提出了一个地方-全球联系(LGN)框架,以揭示涉及研究人员和非学术参与者的跨尺度联合知识生产和社会影响的多个过程。我们以中英合作为例,探讨了区域合作网络的可行性,以说明包括小农在内的非学术行为体参与ARIC的必要性和关键因素。本文的证据来自52名英国科学家、资助机构代表和企业家通过双边合作收集的关于他们对ARIC的经验、意见和看法的第一手数据,以及第二来源。本文从三个角度对ARIS转型进行了讨论。首先,它通过为南方国家的ARIS转型增加ARIC元素,为变革性创新辩论提供了新的亮点。其次,通过描绘ARIC的四条路径,以及不同尺度上自上而下和自下而上的过程,丰富了“路径方法”。第三,它为ARIC研究提供了一个LGN框架,以解决ARIC向南方可持续和公平的农业粮食系统转型的复杂性、多样性和机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does global agricultural research and innovation cooperation influence agricultural R&I system transformation in the South? Evidence from UK-China cooperation
The need for agri-food system transformation has sparked extensive debates on reconfiguring the agricultural research and innovation system (ARIS) to tackle the multidimensional and interwoven challenges present across geographies and scales. This paper highlights the emergence of China, India and Brazil, and their increasing influence on ARIS in the South. We conceptualise global agricultural R&I cooperation (ARIC) to examine how the changing nature of the cooperation between major players from the North and the South influences ARIS transformation in the South. We propose a local–global nexus (LGN) framework to reveal multiple processes involving researchers and non-academic actors for joint knowledge production and social impact across scales. We explore LGN’s feasibility through a case study of UK-China cooperation to illustrate the necessity and key factors influencing the participation of non-academic actors including smallholder farmers in ARIC. Evidence for this paper comes from a combination of primary data collected from 52 British scientists, representatives of funding agencies and entrepreneurs regarding their experiences, opinions and perceptions of ARIC through bilateral cooperation, and second sources. This paper contributes to ARIS transformation debates from three perspectives. First, it sheds new light on transformative innovation debates by adding an ARIC element for ARIS transformation in the South. Second, it enriches a “pathways approach” by delineating four pathways of ARIC, as well as top-down and bottom-up processes across various scales. Third, it offers an LGN framework for ARIC research to address the complexity, diversity and opportunities for ARIS transformation towards sustainable and equitable agri-food systems in the South.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信